I’m really surprised but I’ve seen legal issues dealt with after the eventShe’s lost her case against the government
I’m really surprised but I’ve seen legal issues dealt with after the event
As a 15 year old she was groomed and not protected by the system. But hey who cares eh
yes as she would of still been a childwould you have the same view if she’d left on her 16th birthday 8 weeks later?
yes as she would of still been a child
If London was in Scotland then you'd have a pointWell not if she was in Scotland of course
More importantly the law would see it differently but not very different.would you have the same view if she’d left on her 16th birthday 8 weeks later?
Do you believe she was able to make that decision at 15?would you have the same view if she’d left on her 16th birthday 8 weeks later?
He doesn't, he's doing his contrarian nonsense again, best left alone.Do you believe she was able to make that decision at 15?
It appears that way yesIt's a sad case isn't it. Two 15 year olds and one 16 year old, groomed and systematically brainwashed. And weren't they all married off to IS fighters pretty soon after arriving over there?
Not sure I know the answer though as what we should do/have done with her.
Just a very sad case. The other two girls were both killed weren't they?
On the wider point though bugsy?My personally opinion is you reap what u sow.
who's to say she still doesn't have links to ISIS. that's a national security risk end of.
Which country is she in currently?
At 15? so someone grooms you and it's your fault? We let adult fighters back in, it's government policy.My personal opinion is you reap what u sow.
who's to say she still doesn't have links to ISIS. that's a national security risk end of.
It appears that way yes
It’s why this case is more important that Shamima for me otis
If we are saying 15 year olds are legally responsible under adult laws that’s so so dangerous
It's also illegal as she has no other citizenship. She isn't Bangladeshi, Bangladesh has confirmed that many times already.A state stripping someone of their citizenship doesn’t sit comfortably with me, especially as she was 15 at the time.
I think at 15 you would have knowledge of the law and should be legally responsible yes I do
The citizenship debate is different but you have to be held responsible
at 15 she was child, a child who many people who should of protected her failed.I think at 15 you would have knowledge of the law and should be legally responsible yes I do
The citizenship debate is different but you have to be held responsible
at 15 she was child, a child who many people who should of protected her failed.
Weird
At 15 you are not tried as an adult or shouldn’t beI think at 15 you would have knowledge of the law and should be legally responsible yes I do
The citizenship debate is different but you have to be held responsible
They are not treated the sameSo you’d say the 15 year olds who murdered Brianna Grey are somehow more excused from their actions as they are not 16?
What? Having citizenship doesn't mean she would come back. There's plenty of people in the same camps that do have British citizenship, no one is saying they should repatriate her. In fact she seems more interested in going back to Holland where her husband is from.Pete and O'Day can share custody of her in their spare room then?
She's not going anywhere, she's stuck in a camp that having citizenship won't help her get out of.Let her go back to Holland then...
“From what I heard, Islamically that is all allowed. So I was okay with it.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?