Mowbray played fortune in wide right not as a striker.
Lol.if that's case....why???? I'm not sure he did! We are one nil down. You take a central midfielder off...bring on Fortune..who I'm sorry should never be on the wing! He plays back to goal. doesnt ever look like scoring has no pace...slows down the play.
Fortune is a target man. there's a time and place for bringing him on.
im sure no one was filled with confidence when he came on.
Fortune Strength is strong enough who should be playing up front and holding it up..mixing it up...long balls...bringing others quicker players..into the game.
What's happened to Tudgay...? Not getting a look in recently ahead of Fortune.
Are you suggesting fortune dismissed Mowbray's instructions and decided to play out wide himself????
On target I should have said. Genuinely can't remember them threatening our goal.According to BBC they had 7 shots 4 on target, we had 11 shots 3 on target.
Don't forget we're a struggling team with 20k average crowds , you are a team in form who struggle to get 10000. We are playing totally lacking in confidence but we beat you. As for your support. PATHETIC. At the end of the season and we are promoted and next season you are still playing in a 1/3rd full hockey stadium we'll see who are the better team.
ps never thought i'd go to a stadium that makes MK Dons seem like a football ground but the Ricoh really does it. Used to really enjoy Highfield Rd and went to the first ever top flight game there.
Don't forget we're a struggling team with 20k average crowds , you are a team in form who struggle to get 10000. We are playing totally lacking in confidence but we beat you. As for your support. PATHETIC. At the end of the season and we are promoted and next season you are still playing in a 1/3rd full hockey stadium we'll see who are the better team.
ps never thought i'd go to a stadium that makes MK Dons seem like a football ground but the Ricoh really does it. Used to really enjoy Highfield Rd and went to the first ever top flight game there.
Are you suggesting fortune dismissed Mowbray's instructions and decided to play out wide himself????
Worst team in league one. I'm glad your overpaid players on championship wages are. Short changing you. Most our players have more skill in their tiny toe than your pathetic sorry whole squad has.Not quite 20,000 there today. And how on earth are you going to get promoted? If it wasn't for a very poor ref we would have won today.
Don't forget we're a struggling team with 20k average crowds , you are a team in form who struggle to get 10000. We are playing totally lacking in confidence but we beat you. As for your support. PATHETIC. At the end of the season and we are promoted and next season you are still playing in a 1/3rd full hockey stadium we'll see who are the better team.
ps never thought i'd go to a stadium that makes MK Dons seem like a football ground but the Ricoh really does it. Used to really enjoy Highfield Rd and went to the first ever top flight game there.
Don't forget we're a struggling team with 20k average crowds , you are a team in form who struggle to get 10000. We are playing totally lacking in confidence but we beat you. As for your support. PATHETIC. At the end of the season and we are promoted and next season you are still playing in a 1/3rd full hockey stadium we'll see who are the better team.
ps never thought i'd go to a stadium that makes MK Dons seem like a football ground but the Ricoh really does it. Used to really enjoy Highfield Rd and went to the first ever top flight game there.
watched the game on tv,
observations;
a total, & worrying, for footballs sake, home biased official, Iain Williamson 0/10, should never ref anything above sunday league,
the blatantly evil tackle on Lameiras was nothing short of criminal,
this needs to be reviewed with the option of a retrospective decision to ban McElverley,
he was aided and abetted by Joe Clarke, an assistant who with the benefit of being on the right side of the pitch, was unable to admit that the ball had crossed the line, an incompetent oaf, in any other job he would be summarily dismissed,
these events together with the overall blatant bias towards a side that were determined to kick CCFC off the pitch, only serve to enhance the hatred created towards individuals like Williamson & Clarke,
i would hope that the yellows to Ricketts would be contested & that Williamson would have the balls to admit to his BLATANT errors,
all he needs to do is look at the after match interviews, and LISTEN to the S.U. players response to questions,
i would further hope that CCFC never EVER have to put up with Williamson's dubious antics again,
PUSB & can we have fair & competent officials in future
The tackle had no malice in it it was just very poor. The referee made 3 decisions wrong - he wasn't unfair and wasn't the reason we lost the game.
The tackle had no malice in it it was just very poor. The referee made 3 decisions wrong - he wasn't unfair and wasn't the reason we lost the game.
The tackle had no malice in it it was just very poor. The referee made 3 decisions wrong - he wasn't unfair and wasn't the reason we lost the game.
Surely malice or otherwise doesn't come into it, the only decision the ref has to make is whether the tackle could be construed as serious foul play
http://www.thefa.com/football-rules...ball-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct.aspx
You mean it wasn't the only reason we lost the game. If you really think otherwise, then you are simply wrong.
Surely malice or otherwise doesn't come into it, the only decision the ref has to make is whether the tackle could be construed as serious foul play
http://www.thefa.com/football-rules...ball-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct.aspx
So if our goal had counted, you think we'd have conceded 2?
I never said it wasn't a red card offence - it wasn't an evil tackle as someone said.
Technically it wasn't a goal. It was a penalty which we tend to miss.
If the ball is in the net a splt second after the 'penalty' ( which you dont have Time to blow for ) do you take the ball out and have to kick it in again? Or is it "advantage" and Play on?
grendull, if you think the referee made only 3 decisions wrong then you are a bigger schmuk than i thought, i presume you'll find new pastures,
Technically it wasn't a goal. It was a penalty which we tend to miss.
He means because it should have been a penalty before, so the correct decision should have been a penalty and not a goal.Was it not? I didn't know it had been settled.
Yeah, you've got a point about pens.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?