1. I said "thought the most recent poll suggested"
2. You said "There has never been a poll of all officers"...now you're saying there has - all be it on industrial action
3. Although the poll you refer to was "all officers" I bet not ALL voted
4. The poll I am referring to was after some other 'event' that left an officer dead or maimed
I think neither you nor I know for sure. But I do personally know quite well several (9 now I counted them) ex & current officers that are against all Police being armed & I know 2 armed response officers who logically are in favour of being armed (though not necessarily for ALL of them to be).
So I am not sure that if all officers were given the option to be armed that even 1/3 would take it up. They all have the option to apply for armed duties - don't hear anything about it being generally more desirable than a motorway traffic cop.
...onwards & upwards PUSB
You should be in politics with your twisting of the facts.
1) There has never been a poll of officers re routine arming.
2) You suggested there had been a poll of officers re the above. I said there hadn't, there hasn't been. I pointed out there has on another matter after you suggested such a poll would be difficult.
3) Most officers voted in the poll re industrial action. Should we not accept any result of any vote in this country unless 100% vote, or are you just being pedantic to prove your point
4) The poll you are referring to didn't happen, but you keep using it if you wish.
You are right neither you nor I know, but I also know quite a lot of officers in the job and who have left who are all for routine arming. Officers do have an option to apply for armed roles but only if the job comes up, there is only a finite number, which doesn't help if you aren't one and come face to face with someone willing to use deadly force against you.