Ring Of Steel
Well-Known Member
If you that that was a good performance then I don’t think there’s much left to discuss.
They battered us 0-1. For 91 minscome on mate
Didn’t say that, I said he changed formation to give us a chance.if your gonna have a discussion don’t make things up,If you that that was a good performance then I don’t think there’s much left to discuss.
Didn’t say that, I said he changed formation to give us a chance.if your gonna have a discussion don’t make things up,
It worked, it gave us a chance, you should really read what people say if your going to reply,You said “it worked”.
it didn’t.
And what are you trying to prove with that
And what are you trying to prove with thatwe were 1-0 up after 91 mins, if assante could hit a barn door probably 2-0 I think the formation was working, can’t make it any simpler than that
From the Telegraph apparently.
Robins to Stoke ?
It’s a new regime pal. Lampard will have his own ideas and seems to view him as a striker.That he’d be playing striker with a fully fit squad. He only plays striker when we play two up front.
I don’t want to be harsh or start rowing, so let’s just agree to profoundly disagree.
To be clearer, neither did we, another one who reply’s before they read, I said “ we changed formation to give us a BETTER chance of winning and it worked for 91 mins,To be clear Norwich didn’t even have a striker and scored twice in stoppage time. ‘It worked’ my arse
It has been reported in several places that we got compensation whenever he got a new job.must be true then!
Mark was on a fixed term contract until 2027 I believe, so if we (the club) decided to terminate early we would have had to pay him off - we can’t simply put him on garden leave and avoid that… and certainly can’t sack a manager and then get paid compensation when they join another club, or else every club in the world would do the same
Not another oneWe got battered all game but apart from that it worked
must be true then!
Mark was on a fixed term contract until 2027 I believe, so if we (the club) decided to terminate early we would have had to pay him off - we can’t simply put him on garden leave and avoid that… and certainly can’t sack a manager and then get paid compensation when they join another club, or else every club in the world would do the same
If you that that was a good performance then I don’t think there’s much left to discuss.
Yet, we should’ve went 2-0 up…Granted, we made it a contest in the first half.
Second half we offered next to nothing as we conceded way too much possession, sat too deep and were unable to hold the ball up to relieve the pressure.
The thing that’s most damning in that game was; despite being 0-1 up on 90 minutes, it really wasn’t a surprise they equalized.. or that they won it in time added on. It was a fucking shameful second half performance.
That’s cruel towards BTATo be clearer, neither did we
Granted, we made it a contest in the first half.
Second half we offered next to nothing as we conceded way too much possession, sat too deep and were unable to hold the ball up to relieve the pressure.
The thing that’s most damning in that game was; despite being 0-1 up on 90 minutes, it really wasn’t a surprise they equalized.. or that they won it in time added on. It was a fucking shameful second half performance.
Really? The performance was identical to our playoff clash in Feb 2024. We actually had a best team out that too (bar Sheaf).Very true. And at the risk of inflaming the individuals who get very triggered by anyone saying as it is, it was as bad as anything that’s come before. Apart from Portsmouth.
It has been reported in several places that we got compensation whenever he got a new job.
Wouldn't waste your breath. All he does is copies whoever he thinks will like him most. He has no clueThey battered us 0-1. For 91 minscome on mate, back 5 worked, it was the right decision, couldn’t have got Raphael into that team, and even if we did go 433 sakamoto was in front of him
doesn’t make it correct though
Me ?Wouldn't waste your breath. All he does is copies whoever he thinks will like him most. He has no clue
Not sure repeating it deserves the response you gave though like I’d just invented it for fun.
wasn’t meant to come across as a confrontational response, but if you’re angling for an apology then I apologise
No the weirdo you were replying to.Me ?
Yet, we should’ve went 2-0 up…
I completely disagree that it was shameful. In fact, it was an archetypal away performance that has done us over a few times this season. They had 5 big chances and 3 of those were in the one goal mouth scramble caused by Allen’s mishap.
We mostly defended well, the equaliser was a peach and the second was a lucky finish despite Lati letting Sainz down the wing.
It’s the games like this that really exposes just how behind we are in midfield. Norwich could beat our press, we couldn’t beat there's and that’s the story of this season and last season.
When we had Hamer, we had a midfielder that could run the game, Eccles, Torp and Sheaf show glimpses here and there but don’t do against there’s better teams in this division. It’s getting boring bringing up Hamer every week but it’s obvious that’s the single most important area we need to improve on
Oh, makes sense nowNo the weirdo you were replying to.
He has fuck all clue about what he can copy off somebody else.
Love it when you put something then end up arguing about something you haven’t even saidNo the weirdo you were replying to.
He has fuck all clue about what he can copy off somebody else.
I will try and answer this without upsetting anybodyAnd what are you trying to prove with thatwe were 1-0 up after 91 mins, if assante could hit a barn door probably 2-0 I think the formation was working, can’t make it any simpler than that
One was a worldly strike and the other a result of a foul on Latti at 90 mins I was feeling comfortable and wanting them to do some sh1thousery but we as usual too nice.To be clear Norwich didn’t even have a striker and scored twice in stoppage time. ‘It worked’ my arse
Be careful mate. When you argue with one of the agenda crew you argue with them all.Love it when you put something then end up arguing about something you haven’t even said
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?