ACL have stated that they wanted to go 'open book' on all revenues; so be careful with regards what is being claimed about visibility. They also claim they wanted to minute and publish the most recent meetings with SISU's representatives for the purposes of clarity - which would prevent the misuse of claims such as this - but were prevented from doing so by legal sanction.
Fisher claimed again on the radio today that they are paying 'rent' and have 'paid £800K since last spring'. Listen to it. The claim is clearly made.
Note: he doesn't bear reference to match-day costs, he clearly states 'rent'
I never said that TF hasn't made that claim regarding te "£800,000 since last Spring", he made it a couple of weeks ago as well if I am not mistaken.
If ACL have said that why haven't they done so, I thought recently that I had read that TF had said that ACL weren't willing to show the amounts on the revenues on F&B?
It's not really irrelevant unfortunately OSB as CCFC would have to predict such figures into there financing over 12 Months while filing there accounts and why they can't agree on that revenue there is no way we can plan for it..
It's not really irrelevant unfortunately OSB as CCFC would have to predict such figures into there financing over 12 Months while filing there accounts and why they can't agree on that revenue there is no way we can plan for it..
Dangerous to question OSB on financial matters unless you're absolutely sure you 100% correct, what with accountancy being his day job lol
He was wrong though torchy....oh and chill out my friend, you're sounding more and more like a WUM.How dare he, eh?! Burn him! Burn him!
He was wrong though torchy....oh and chill out my friend, you're sounding more and more like a WUM.
And i was just giving some friendly advice that...gulp...when you try and correct someone knowledgeable, you ought to get your facts right.Not at all. I just people are allowed to have their opinions even if it means....gulp...disagreeing with OSB.
Dangerous to question OSB on financial matters unless you're absolutely sure you 100% correct, what with accountancy being his day job lol
And i was just giving some friendly advice that...gulp...when you try and correct someone knowledgeable, you ought to get your facts right, otherwise you look stupid.
Not at all. I just people are allowed to have their opinions even if it means....gulp...disagreeing with OSB.
And i was just giving some friendly advice that...gulp...when you try and correct someone knowledgeable, you ought to get your facts right, otherwise you look stupid.
I know while reading OSB's post I felt as if I was back in school being lectured about my coursework regarding my theory and how it was inept and how I had misplaced my opinion.. Sorry OSB how dare I question you!
Torch's comment I took for what it was a sly dig in the ribs with no malice intended
Now look, I love OSB me, I really do. I respect him highly for his knowledge. However, it doesn't mean that someone shouldn't say "Hold on a mo, OSB...." Doing that isn't, in your words, "dangerous". That's all I was saying.
If you think I look stupid because of it then so be it, I look stupid.
Saying that, it would be interesting what would happen if OSB said "Right, I want you all to jump off a cliff".
you know what chap I dont mind, dare i say it enjoy discussions and I dont mind being disagreed with, never have. I was not personal in what I put nor was it degrogatory. I disagreed with what you put and explained nothing more. Thats what forums are for isnt it. No need to be childish about it.
Torch's comment I took for what it was a sly dig in the ribs with no malice intended
At this moment it feels like me, OSB, Torchy and Dancewithhorses should all have one big cuddle to resolve our differences
Am I reading this correctly and that your calling me stupid?
no differences for me settle Robo ...... your opinion is just as good as mine even if I see it differently, torch danceswithhorses and me are fine i reckon
My apologies Robo...that was never the intention...i just got caught up in a mini arguement with torchy and shot from the hip.
I have edited said remark and apologise again.
I thought he was calling me stupid.
I thought he was calling me stupid.
Don't worry about it kido! You can't hate bretherin from Coventry
You callin me kido !!
LOL..havent been called that for a long time
Nice one Shane , made him squirm
Anyone have a link to the interview?
I know OSB58 has given the link earlier in this thread, however I feel the 8 minute interview with TF is essential listening for all of us:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p014rksd
Listen from 2 hrs 10 mins until 2 hrs 18 mins.
Fisher claims that CCFC have paid £800k of the £1.2m rent, conveniently forgetting that £500k came from the ESCROW a/c which was never CCFC's money in the first place.
Some good questions from O'Connor.
Conjures up a mental image of Fisher with a fish tail squirming as he's hooked by an ACL fisherman's rod.....
So Licesters entire ground is worth 17m and then consider that the costing for CCFC to buy 50% of the operating company (not the ground itself) is quoted to be circa 15m
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?