Sky Blues administrator: Still time for warring parties to strike up a deal (1 Viewer)

[/QUMr Appleton said: "I've found no evidence of any physical transfer of assets thus far.

Well of course it wouldn't have been physical; I very much doubt a lorry turned up at Ltd and physically transferred the players to another company called Holdings. The word "physical" seems to be PA's 'get out' in case it is later revealed that there was in fact an illegal transfer of assets.

"All the current players' contracts we've seen since the date of the administration are in Holdings."

Again - this is potentially a very misleading statement. Surely PA should be talking about the location of players' contracts that were signed prior to the date of administration.

To me these two statements are extremely suspicious in that - at first glance - they suggest no impropriety but on closer inspection they are meaningless. That makes me think that there may well have been illegal transfers of assets. If PA is confident that is not the case, then why hasn't PA said so? Why is PA using weasel words? OTE]THESE beeing the most important question has been asked 4 times on this thread and no one has answered it , when did the players move from ltd to holdings? we all know it was before admin

Click to expand...

Chipfat said:

Appleton told the majority of fans from early on they wouldn't be happy with the outcome or his findings, he looks and see's what he wants within the law to suit what Sisu want....Anyone who thinks differently needs to look into his statements, all fall into line including his timing of release, he cant find this, cant find that, didn't know what he was selling for months... He like the owners are a joke, they are masters at play on words and misdirection while taking the club further away from its home.

Im fucked off with all parties involved for being so headstrong that a compromise cant be found, but no one can tell me Appleton was appointed for no good reason other than Sisu have certain control....TF said in front of hundreds watching and thousands listening Ltd had nothing in it ,,, Appleton played dumb while other interested parties were left guessing what they were potentially buying..It was never a fair playing field and still listening to the pair of them BS now some still see fit to defend.... Angry i was, frustrated i have been but now i have come to the conclusion in my opinion no matter the outcome TF and Appleton are playing within the rules but morally outside the norm, while laughing at every fan who has ever followed this club. I feel sorry for those who will run to buy shirts buy sixfields tickets and jump at every chance they have to defend this process or people who are running our club without care or moral obligation to its history or city without its name would not even be a club......

Click to expand...

Godiva said:

It is surely one massive conspiracy.
Or is it a case of 'a thief that believes everybody steals'?

Click to expand...

SIR ERNIE said:

hahaha are you seriously arguing that SISU and the onside SISU-appointed administrator have NOT conspired to ensure SISU achieve their aims?

Click to expand...

sky blue john said:

So if Appleton is only prepared to mention players in Holdings from start of administration process !!!!
Why did he make a big thing of going back to year dot of Ccfc's history ?

Click to expand...

GaryPendrysEyes said:

Les Reid has had a pro Sisu agenda for some time, despite his Editor calling for Sisu to go if they chose to take us to Northants.
This article shouts the dubious premise of getting 10 points back, without any evidence of that at all. It is designed to pressure ACL and support Sisu's aims.

Those aims are getting the Ricoh way below market value, they have been repeatedly offered lower rent deals for months on end.. If Joy had wanted to sort a rent deal they could have months ago, they don't.

Click to expand...

Voice_of_Reason said:

OK, but which company PAID for the players when they were bought ? CCFC Ltd or CCFC Holdings Limited. All the assets in CCFC accounts show the players as assets in CCFC Ltd, not Holdings -- explain Mr Appleton explain.....

Click to expand...

M&B Stand said:

Why do people want a good deal for ACL? I couldn't give a shit about them. The football club should be all that matters. I don't want some stadium management making money out of the us, The club should play there for whatever rent the ladies pay and keep all the money they generate. Maybe then we can fulfill the potential a one club City the size of ours has.

Click to expand...

Jack Griffin said:

Well if CCFC do not return to the Ricoh isn't the alternative to have division 3 football with the occasional foray into the championship.. is that your ambition?

Also I believe a deal must be equitable, not made at the point of a metaphorical gun.

Click to expand...

torchomatic said:

Along with Greg Clarke, Greg Dyke, Les Reid...etc, etc, etc

Click to expand...

letsallsingtogether said:

Oh dear you saying that!!
After calling Elliott and Co corrupt suppose it doesn't fit your criteria........

So everything Greg and Co say is correct and above board have a word only in it for themselves fuck the Cov fans.......

Click to expand...

oldskyblue58 said:

Just a question - what is it that would appear to be wrong with this Appleton confirmation reported by the CT .............

"He said the League had confirmed all current players' contracts were in the Holdings company."

............ I thought that contracts and registrations should be with the golden share per FL rules............... which was awarded to ............ Otium Entertainment Group Limited. I understood that part of this process did was to unify everything(shares/registrations/contracts/club) in to one company not create exactly the same situation as before but with different company names??

Click to expand...

oldskyblue58 said:

So which company is it Otium or CCFCH? Because the FL have given the share to Otium havent they? But Fisher & Appleton seem to think CCFCH owns the players?

Click to expand...

oldskyblue58 said:

I dont see why they cant be clear in statements about things like this. But as usual muddy waters

Click to expand...