J
Jack Griffin
Guest
I think you underestimate the lengths to which Joy will go to get her pound of flesh.
It's not possible!! As I eluded too earlier in the thread there is a FL Rule that makes that situation we all fear is a non goer.
Showing my support for the team is following the lads where they need the support.
It's not possible!! As I eluded too earlier in the thread there is a FL Rule that makes that situation we all fear is a non goer.
Showing my support for the team is following the lads where they need the support.
What about like when Brighton moved 70 miles to Gillingham as a short term solution. It lasted a long time before they came back.
I realise rules have changed over time but we could still end up playing for years outside Coventry.
Be careful as once this starts you don't know where it may stop.
St Andrews is the best option IMO. Only a short train/drive
I rest my case.
I'm sorry to hear you went to Pompey, that was shitty.
not far from the airport too, for jet set sb's
It was shitty. I'm sorry I haven't read this whole thread so what was your 'case'?
You do understand that ACL offered to sign over their share of the profits and the revenue in total?
They offered 80%... 20% short IMO.
They offered 80% of the profits which is the maximum they possibly can-they also offered to cross invoice 100% of the revenue for the club's FFP purposes. You don't seem to be brushed up on all the details young Taylor.
Ok fair enough.
I just think it's wrong that our home games are played out of the City. I have no desire to watch those games and I hope it does not happen.
Young Taylor? C'mon you're only 4 years older than me
Why can't they offer 100% of profits?
So ACL would send an invoice us 100% of the revenue for FFP purposes, but we wouldn't get 100% right? Wouldn't that be illegal and could we get punished for it? Clear this up.
I admit, I was missing for bit so missed some tiny details, I've only got an understanding of the F&B revenues status, I know it's not 100% and that's what I think it should be, whoever owns the club.
Why can't they offer 100% of profits?
So ACL would send an invoice us 100% of the revenue for FFP purposes, but we wouldn't get 100% right? Wouldn't that be illegal and could we get punished for it? Clear this up.
I admit, I was missing for bit so missed some tiny details, I've only got an understanding of the F&B revenues status, I know it's not 100% and that's what I think it should be, whoever owns the club.
Entirely different as Brighton's ground was sold and promptly demolished for a retail park. The Ricoh remains open and available for us to use.
The circumstances may be different but all I'm saying is don't all moan when we end up doing a ground share while a new ground is supposedly built which could take years or never be built if SISU are able to hang in there. All because everyone went along with playing anywhere no questions asked as long as its got the word Coventry in it and when the season has nothing left to play for.
All these people moaning about the heresy of changing from a Sky Blue kit but its no problem to move City. It beggars belief.
If people are willing to travel to Portsmouth and Walsall for away games, refusing to go to a home game away is a bit much. I'll support my team when, where and how I can.
If ever supporters had a chance to put across their feelings on the idea of moving outside the City then this is it. We aren't getting promoted so who gives a shit if we lose. By going to the game you are saying its okay. Its not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?