er not sure i would want to see any DVDs of Jim Davidson until the court case is over.
I've got a couple of Jim Davidson and a cracking Bernard Manning DVD you can borrow if you wantimp:
Well its not outrageous its just piss poor attempt at grabbing voters from every demographiic you can. Obviously Cameron thinks food banks and growing inequality is a sign of a Christian country. Tosser.
er not sure i would want to see any DVDs of Jim Davidson until the court case is over.
Probably one of the few around here that has done Moral Philosophy at University.
We are driven by a Christian Framework in this country but the demographics are always changing. When people stop taking there morality from dusty old books and figuring out that there may be other driving forces that control the individual and societies morality and meta-ethics, then this society with which we all live in will become a better place.
Did it get you a good job ?
A mature student. I did this for my own knowledge, not to find work from it.
Probably one of the few around here that has done Moral Philosophy at University.
We are driven by a Christian Framework in this country but the demographics are always changing. When people stop taking their morality from dusty old books and figuring out that there may be other driving forces that control the individual and societies morality and meta-ethics, then this society with which we all live in will become a better place.
Probably one of the few around here that has done Moral Philosophy at University.
We are driven by a Christian Framework in this country but the demographics are always changing. When people stop taking their morality from dusty old books and figuring out that there may be other driving forces that control the individual and societies morality and meta-ethics, then this society with which we all live in will become a better place.
A mature student. I did this for my own knowledge, not to find work from it.
It is a strange thing to talk about being bound by Christian values of fairness when, in the name of religion, we persecuted or treated as second class most people who weren't straight white men. Quite what this has to do with the Supporters Consultative Group, CCFC, football or even sport is however another matter
Immature student I would suggest
Probably not a lot to do with the SCG but the thread did get onto morality and ethics so I thought I would add my ten pence worth.
The problem of course in calling this a Christian country is that there are so many flavours of Christianity in the UK which drive what we think and do, you can't really pin down what a Christian country actually is or does.
When you live in Scotland for a while you come to realise that belief in God isn't a qualifier for calling yourself Catholic or Protestant. As an evil scientist my place in Hell is already guaranteed so I may as well crack on with things as normal.
I neither wanted to be nor was I a school prefect so technically you are correct. I never made the grade as a school prefect as I wasn't one.I bet you were never able to make the grade as school prefect were you James?
Interesting to say you are a scientist. I am one of the few who are turning back the nonsense from the Discovery Institute.
Doing a PhD in chemistry. The branch of science that is blamed for causing climate change, killing animals for fun in pharma companies, and toxic waste. When I worked at GSK there was an official procedure for what to do if the site was stormed by animal rights protestors-despite no animal testing happening on the premises.
Well did anything happen at this meeting if its finished,who had a go at who etc?
SCG have NO mandate and no fan backing
They are an embarrassment
But in a way the SCG wasn't set up by fans for fans, it was set up by the clubs give them a 'focus group' of fans to which they could consult with.
Actually, I believe it was originally set up by the Sky Blue Trust and most other members came on via invitations/nominations from the Trust (source: Lionel Bird, SBT Board member). Apparently, Jonathan Strange took his place as representative of London Supporters, a body from which he resigned because he could not agree with their stance over Sixfields ground-share, yet didn't step down from SCG at the same time.But in a way the SCG wasn't set up by fans for fans, it was set up by the clubs give them a 'focus group' of fans to which they could consult with.
How is this focus group in anyway representative of the views of fans?
I can understand the Sky Blue Trust who speak to their membership and are Democratic but what about the other members?
It is a strange thing to talk about being bound by Christian values of fairness when, in the name of religion, we persecuted or treated as second class most people who weren't straight white men. Quite what this has to do with the Supporters Consultative Group, CCFC, football or even sport is however another matter
But in a way the SCG wasn't set up by fans for fans, it was set up by the clubs give them a 'focus group' of fans to which they could consult with.
No news from the SCG then?
Are the SBT still allowed to represent its thousands of members in a fans forum.
Or do they have to toe the chairmans party line?
I assume you've arranged your meeting with ML by now. Why not ask him when you are with him and express your concerns?
Grendel you are barking up the wrong tree on this one and it is a little embarrassing.
I have no fear of having a pleasant meeting with ML on a hotel sofa whilst drinking. Discussing CCFC sounds very pleasant.
It is unlikely he going give me a Glaswegian kiss whilst shouting 'you've had this coming Dongo'
My issue was not with meeting him. It was that some people had and never bothered to have the curtesy to let anyone else on here know what ML has said.
Then when it began to drip out, when anyone was asking how has this come about they got attacked.
All I got to this simple question was do you want a meeting or not keyboard warrior!
So I contacted the person directly who I felt was actually ML. ( I was that scared to meet him)
Turns out he wasn't by this point it came out how all the meetings had come about and that you all seemed to be saying it was a waste of time.
So it was the process and the attitude that bothered me. Not the fear of ML giving me a good going over.
But hey ho keep calling me a keyboard warrior, I have a kinder egg left over from easter for you when you have eaten all your dinner.
Again, I am more than happy to pass your details over for a chat. I would be interested to know who you did contact, contacting random people won't do anything.
I am not sure he would give anybody a good going over.
Nobody was attacked, it was the people giving it loads about not knowing about it, so then I put it on them I would arrange to get them there but it suddenly went quiet...
If you are so bothered about what was said and what he was asked and if he was asked the questions you want, then speak to him yourself, rather than contacting random people presuming they are him.
Just ranting for the sake of it.
But in a way the SCG wasn't set up by fans for fans, it was set up by the clubs give them a 'focus group' of fans to which they could consult with.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?