I think the ground is kept under a different company so that it is protected if the club go tits up. That stops people buying the club out of admin just to get the ground. It's not unusual. I might be wrong but I don't think Wasps RFC own ACL; they are both owned seperately by the "owners"
To pay for it ?
They have already talked about putting there own management company in (like ACL)
Some club owners are involved in the clubs for the love of football. They keep putting money in or at least keep the club ticking over. SISU came to us to make money :thinking about: So if they put their investors money into building a stadium they would want a return on it. And they would see it being better for us to pay them rent and not to Wasps.
But would that not lead to a separate company owning the stadium having no income? Unless they charged CCFC for using it?
The 365 day income from the stadium would go to which company ? Surely CCFC would not get it all?
If thats the case what's the difference to being at the Ricoh.
Lets see the figures !!
Why wouldn't it be? I'd much rather co-own a stadium with Coventry RFC than rent from a soulless franchise.
Fisher said they will never build in Coventry as all trust has been lost. The land at the Butts isn't very big. The infrastructure could be a lot better.
So what makes you think that SISU would build at the Butts?
Fisher said they will never build in Coventry as all trust has been lost. The land at the Butts isn't very big. The infrastructure could be a lot better.
So what makes you think that SISU would build at the Butts?
Virtually every football club who own the stadium have a separate holding company for the property. The club would be part of an umbrella structure and would be able to benefit from revenues.
I've told you this countless times do why bore everyone (other than the usual bunch) - you don't need telling anyway as you know why it's needed - others who don't understand than latch on it as a legitimate argument.
I've shown you countless times the fact that clubs in the championship with far lower crowds than us attracting far bigger earnings.
Change the record.
I can't think of many club owners who are now involved for the love.
You're both focusing and making assumptions on SISU's agenda without knowing the facts. If SISU want to make any money out of us then they need success both on and off the pitch.
Personally I want us to build a new stadium but would prefer to stall for a few years to see how Wasps work out. Ultimately the whole situation is a fucking farce in that the stadium built for the football club is now owned by a London rugby club.
You are not up to speed on this.
Any new stadium needs to provide a return for is investors and this will be obtained from anybody using it.
Your saying it will all go to CCFC?
Perhaps we can release a Bond - that seems to work for your friends
You have no idea what any structuring would be and how a return would be generated
I would assume that they'd build there because a) it would be cheaper b) it would be quicker c) it's in Coventry
The infrastructure is decent enough, no worse than Highfield road.
Ultimately it's all conjecture and until we know the facts there's really no point in continuing to make assumptions. SISU appear to have learnt some lessons on the field in the last 18 months, let's hope they've also done the same off field.
Virtually every football club who own the stadium have a separate holding company for the property. The club would be part of an umbrella structure and would be able to benefit from revenues.
I've told you this countless times do why bore everyone (other than the usual bunch) - you don't need telling anyway as you know why it's needed - others who don't understand than latch on it as a legitimate argument.
I've shown you countless times the fact that clubs in the championship with far lower crowds than us attracting far bigger earnings.
Change the record.
Fisher said they would never build in Coventry.
Highfield road was built in the days before people had cars. Now you need parking. The city centre wouldn't have enough spaces and the local roads are already congested on Saturdays.
These points are not assumptions. They are facts.
Fisher said they would never build in Coventry.
So we ought to be celebrating a sign of flexibility, rather than holding him to his word, no?
No, because every word he says is a lie, unless it suits of course.
Is Fisher still at the club anyway?
Astute and Italia: Why do you put so much faith in Fisher's statements considering that you don't find him credible?
No, because every word he says is a lie, unless it suits of course.
Is Fisher still at the club anyway?
It's a good job nobody took ACL at their word when they said 'negotiations are at an end' before we moved to Northampton...
I dunno, it just surely seems a good thing, to be encouraged, if the club want to build a ground in Coventry. Far more sensible to push them to develop that then insist they build in Leamington because they said so!
Your missing the point of the thread.
We don't believe whats been said we just want the facts !!
There is no point to this thread, it'd be far more interesting and productive if we were discussing Fisher's favourite crisp flavour!
Cheese & Onion I reckon.
Cheese & Onion I reckon.
Cheese & Onion I reckon.
You've completely avoided the questionErr he is the chairman of our club.
You believe Grendel but he's not the chairman. You do know that don't you ?
All we want is the facts so we can support the best plan.
The packet would be empty but some fans would still buy it !!
You've completely avoided the question
I said because he is the chairman.
Do you believe he should resign if he is lying to you ?
Some people buy the crisps when they are being offered for free all over the city.
Do you believe we will build a stadium?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Do you believe we will build a stadium?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I reckon he'd go for a cheeky chicken and stuffing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?