Cheshire Sky Blue
New Member
No they would go to court to Sue for the delay..
Understand that even if sisu where given the Ricoh free of charge they wouldn't even say thank you.:blue:
How do you know it's CCFC money?
Well you said:
I doubt SISU have received enough money from the snooker attendance and pittance of merchandise sales to fund a JR review, what I am trying to say is it's more likely that the funding for the JR review is coming from SISU themselves.
Before your sarcastic comments I haven't seen the article on CT nor can I open so it was a genuine question, so can you give me a proper answer instead of a sarcastic one?
That depends if the prospect of a 60 something year old woman revealing all does anything for you?!
what do you think management fee's are?
So spending CCFC's money- money CCFC dont have on court cases is a good thing? And some accuse CCC of wasting money...really?
Surely, it's SISU's money? You and others keep telling us they are one in the same.
Today saw Sisu-related companies seeking a “disclosure” order to force the council to release more documents as evidence - ahead of an oral hearing scheduled for November 25.
We can't assume that's correct until the accounts are submitted though so it's just a piss in the wind frankly..
If they're one and the same, then by definition it must be CCFC's too.......
I doubt highly it's CCFC money..
wake up rob. when are the accounts being submitted? do they ever give a full breakdown of what the "management" fee's are anyway? from what I've seen they could quite literally throw anything in that pot.
That's where it's going to end up Robo.
If you don't believe that, where do you think the cost will end up?
Surely, it's SISU's money? You and others keep telling us they are one in the same.
It's not about waking up I get what your saying Tony, I wouldn't know I'd have too look at the accounts yet none of them ever seem to get filed on time!
Maybe you are right I don't dispute that but I can't see where the money could be coming from within the revenue of the CCFC business, so it's either within the budget SISU are using to pay over the next five years or it's pumped by SISU for their own motives..
and what is that budget? have sh1tsu ever made it public? given a ruff estimation of what that needs to be? said what the ceiling is?
The answer too all your questions is the same..
thanks for clearing that up
Sorry Torch- I'm not being contrary for the sake of it... CT states- "Coventry City owners claim loan to ACL was 'unlawful state aid' designed to 'drive them out of Coventry' "
How can it not be reasonably concluded that its CCFC's money?
Are CCFC not owned by SISU/Otium or are they mutually exclusive in your view?
They have a point though. ACL did try and force them out and it failed spectacularly. As DTD said I presume (as we all do) that it is SISU money but it will be loaded onto the club in some shape or form.
So we agree- ultimately it will be CCFC financing the action.. which was my fundamental point.
Quite how you conclude ACL tried to force SISU out and ignore SISU withheld rental monies .... cause and effect.
So we agree- ultimately it will be CCFC financing the action.. which was my fundamental point.
Quite how you conclude ACL tried to force SISU out and ignore SISU withheld rental monies .... cause and effect.
They have a point though. ACL did try and force them out and it failed spectacularly. As DTD said I presume (as we all do) that it is SISU money but it will be loaded onto the club in some shape or form.
Can you show me the ACL/CCC statement that we are trying to force sisu out. It is my belief that the ACL/CCC attempt
to put CCFC/sisu into admin was a last throw of the dice to get a corrupt organisation to pay legally owed rent arrears,
a perfectly just action.
They have a point though. ACL did try and force them out and it failed spectacularly. As DTD said I presume (as we all do) that it is SISU money but it will be loaded onto the club in some shape or form.
Acl are we???
I'm not arguing or disagreeing about the rent. Absolutely not. However, ACL are no angels. Firstly they reneged on the deal over the ACL mortgage and then tried to force a change of ownership. Don't get me wrong SISU are shit owners but that is one of the reasons why the Council not NOT be involved with the stadium; the power to force out the owners of the club should not be the remit of the council.
Acl are we???
Surely it going to court is a good thing? Will either get thrown out or investigated? If they don't have a leg to stand on it will be thrown out straight away won't it and cost sisu loads in fees? Surely a good thing for nopm?
I'm not arguing or disagreeing about the rent. Absolutely not. However, ACL are no angels. Firstly they reneged on the deal over the ACL mortgage and then tried to force a change of ownership. Don't get me wrong SISU are shit owners but that is one of the reasons why the Council not NOT be involved with the stadium; the power to force out the owners of the club should not be the remit of the council.
Allegedly reneged on an alleged deal over the ACL mortgage etc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?