rob9872
Well-Known Member
On the converse it's like betting £20 at 3/1 and claiming you won £60.
That's because you have!
On the converse it's like betting £20 at 3/1 and claiming you won £60.
What's actually incredible is you believe every word Mr Fisher says.
Extraordinary.
Tim Fisher constantly quoted before lats night "The football Club is not for sale"
Tim Fisher after last night " every football club is for sales & last night put off any investor"
The guy is full of it. i dont for one minute think that last night changed his stance on selling the club... i think he said that purely to try and piss the fans off , wind up merchant.
...so moving this on assuming we are for sale then, who are likely to want us?
Yes there is huge potential for a big city club, our history demonstrates that but we have no assets to speak of with only a tentative rent arrangement at the Ricoh.
Pretty big obstacles for any new owners.
Breaking even and treading water is one thing which could be seen by potential buyers that only modest investment would make the difference to move the club forward.
So is this not the time for Hoffman and his cohorts to return to the fray? Or any others who fancy us? New owners could surely work a long term deal with the Ricoh acceptable to WASP and CCFC? New owners could mend all those destroyed bridges with the council among others. A clean slate to work from.
So the big question is why is there no formal offers coming forward?
Trouble is the first rule of communications is the ability to listen. Fisher needs to remember he has two ears and one mouth and to use them in that proportion.That's the thing, communication lacks on the basic things from the ground up as well as basic customer service. If they sorted that it's a start.
Don't think any investors were there, but perhaps if they were watching on TV, and they understand football (which clearly Fisher doesn't) they may feel that the CCFC is worth the effort as despite 9 years of continual dross there are fans who are prepared to stand up for their club and fight for its future.
They may even see the potential of the fan base if we ever had some success.
Not got time to go through all this thread so sorry if this has been covered, but I listened to most of TF's interview (thought talk Sport did well, because they didn't rant at him - please note tonight's callers). What I did prick my ears up at was his claim that the club had gone from losing £15M a year (think it was that) to making a profit of £1M a year )he DID say that). If they only want to break even, surely that £1M should be going back on the pitch? (or am I missing something??)
I think the problem is you need to get costs down sufficiently in order to rebuild and implement a progressive strategy. We will likely need to hit rock bottom before we start to rise again, and as bleak as it seems we aren't quite there yet.Totally agree, there's breaking even as part of a greater strategy for progressing the club and breaking even while letting the club drift into oblivion.
Sorry to change from football to cricket, but Paul Collingwood said 'listen' every third word in an interviewReally cringe when people say "Listen" in an interview after the game. John Terry loves it!
Trouble is the first rule of communications is the ability to listen. Fisher needs to remember he has two ears and one mouth and to use them in that proportion.
"Fans are the mainstay"
"My job is to balance between owners and supporters" - worst possible bloke who could do such a job! His position is untenable
Bloody hell, I meant £80!That's because you have!
because like sisu tried to destroy acl and higgs other could be waiting until sisu are begging to get rid of us.?...so moving this on assuming we are for sale then, who are likely to want us?
Yes there is huge potential for a big city club, our history demonstrates that but we have no assets to speak of with only a tentative rent arrangement at the Ricoh.
Pretty big obstacles for any new owners.
Breaking even and treading water is one thing which could be seen by potential buyers that only modest investment would make the difference to move the club forward.
So is this not the time for Hoffman and his cohorts to return to the fray? Or any others who fancy us? New owners could surely work a long term deal with the Ricoh acceptable to WASP and CCFC? New owners could mend all those destroyed bridges with the council among others. A clean slate to work from.
So the big question is why is there no formal offers coming forward?