Let's be clear about this; having the club breaking even - though it's a laudable ambition - isn't a situation the owners should be proud of, given the way they're realised ambition. The great way to do it is to build whatever revenues are available - and I know not all are, so that not the debate; and operate within whatever budgets can be improved. Fisher complains about incomes, and I do have sympathies with him in that regard, but what revenues he does have he's burned; through losing his customer base, and creating a toxic brand that most commercial parties can't see advantage with partnering with; so sponsorship is down.
Thereafter, to take this newly reduced budget and cut, cut, cut; with a team filled with the revolving door of loaned youngsters, directors who run the club/play a role in property development/act as first-team coach, and a club shop that's sometimes run from a trestle table.
There's routes to break-even and routes to break-even. One is a great achievement. One is cruelly simplistic and cruelly negative in it's execution. We're not in the former