That’s why I asked him to provide context.
It wasn’t racist and Grendull knows that. Just ask Sickboy, that’s who the comment was aimed at. Grendull needs the distraction because it’s just dawned on him he’s a closet UKIP supporter. I’m not surprised he’s brought it up and misrepresented it again, just surprised it took him so long. It won’t be the last time he drags it up when he can’t concede an argument, needs to try and discredit someone because he’s being an arse and needs to make someone look worse than him etc. etc.
Those who run the EU don't do it for our benefit. So no. It won't change much. And even you admit that change is needed.I don’t think an organisation representing 500 million people will drastically change when Juncker goes. It will depend on the policy decided by the council. The commission gets its brief from the council.
Don't you mean that it isn't racist in YOUR view?It wasn’t racist and Grendull knows that. Just ask Sickboy, that’s who the comment was aimed at. Grendull needs the distraction because it’s just dawned on him he’s a closet UKIP supporter. I’m not surprised he’s brought it up and misrepresented it again, just surprised it took him so long. It won’t be the last time he drags it up when he can’t concede an argument, needs to try and discredit someone because he’s being an arse and needs to make someone look worse than him etc. etc.
But somebody as bent as him holds a top job at the EU for another 3 years. And you don't have a problem with it. If you do you hide it very well.Until 2021. He is doing his job until then. That has nothing to do with Luxemburg tax laws.
Is it racist when I call my children cheeky monkeys? The answer is of course no, because it’s about context.Don't you mean that it isn't racist in YOUR view?
Cheeky monkeys?Is it racist when I call my children cheeky monkeys? The answer is of course no, because it’s about context.
What on earth are you on about? What part of his legacy are you referring to?
Wait until he has been tried.
What known war criminals?
Cheeky monkeys?
How much more do you want to twist it?
So would you like to explain how monkey boy has changed to cheeky monkey?
It is a racist term. And it doesn't matter what context it is used in. It shouldn't be used.
monkey boy - Wiktionary
Fascist Spain was always an ally of Nazi Germany, nothing has changed.
There is no way he can ever get a fair trial in Spain and the German court knows that. It was simply politically expedient to extradite him.
List of Most Wanted Nazi War Criminals according to the Simon Wiesenthal Center - Wikipedia
Germany refuses to extradite known war criminals even after they have been convicted and sentenced by a foreign court. Fewer than 10% of known war criminals were ever prosecuted, the majority went on to live lives of luxury often shielded by the foreign subsidiaries of big German companies.
Negotiated how many years ago? So why was nothing signed?
Another true Mart fact.
Those who run the EU don't do it for our benefit. So no. It won't change much. And even you admit that change is needed.
But somebody as bent as him holds a top job at the EU for another 3 years. And you don't have a problem with it. If you do you hide it very well.
But somebody as bent as him holds a top job at the EU for another 3 years. And you don't have a problem with it. If you do you hide it very well.
Meanwhile, Gerard Batten, low life UKIP head, has claimed in the EU parliament that the EU was created, or rather planned, by the Nazis in 1942.
What can't you get into your head? Or is it normal for this thread and not wanting to understand?Is this racist?
By the way your link has two meanings for the term monkey boy and one wasn’t racist. So thanks for confirming that context is important when calling someone monkey boy as to whether it’s racist or not.
Other examples. Monkey boy, as in performing monkey (as per the clip and as in the context used as a jibe at Sickboy). Monkey man, as in Ian Brown lead singer from Stone Roses. Monkey man, as in the song by Toots and the Maytalls and covered by the specials. I’m sure I could think of many more if I could be bothered.
There has been years of negotiations with India. I suppose the deal is also done with them and is waiting to be signed.Nothing was signed because after years of negotiations Trump came along and scrapped it unilaterally as he doesn’t think much of black people, especially the „Kenyan“ ( according to the moron Trump) Obama.
And as you like to make out he hardly has a say. But in reality he has a massive say in everything. But you don't like doing reality.Of course they do. It might not pan out that way, as with Brexit. The EI council is composed of elected national politicians who want to be re-elected, and the parliament of MEPs, not by fake news morons like Trump. It won’t change much because Juncker could not legislate. He could propose things, but they have to be agreed. His successor will be given the same task and life will go on. Maybe there will be some reforms, but he isn’t king of the EU.
What do you suggest I do? No one else has been able to dislodge him. That doesn’t mean to say I think he’s great. In fact I hardly mention him as he is not a reason for leaving or staying.
What can't you get into your head? Or is it normal for this thread and not wanting to understand?
It is a racist term. Yes or no?
The answer is yes as you have finally admitted.
So why do you think it is OK to use a racist term depending on when it is used. At best it is a derogatory remark. At worst it is a racist derogatory remark.
Free pass?Now Farage is claiming that he chatted with the Trump team about Brexit and Trump was spouting his, Farage, BS over the Murdoch Brexit Media to undermine May. Farage is praying that we get a new PM. He is claiming the glory. May is undermined and the president has got us by the goolies ( or pussy if you prefer ).
Farage is talking about the new world order. Meanwhile, Gerard Batten, low life UKIP head, has claimed in the EU parliament that the EU was created, or rather planned, by the Nazis in 1942. Somewhat to the chagrin of the Nazi commentators on a UKIP lovers comments on YouTube. They are annoyed at Batten blaming Nazis when it was the Jews all the time. Hilarious how the extremists argue about whose bullshit is right. Batten was asking the Poles to break ranks and help the UK in Brexit negotiations because we also helped them against Nazis. Even my right wing ex UKIP brother wrote a blog explaining what a stupid person Gerard Batten is.
And you are worried about tax rates in Luxemburg whilst you give these scum a pass.
Bollocks.It’s a racist term when used as a racist term. As YOUR link, that’s YOUR link confirms. I acknowledge that YOUR link is accurate, shame you can’t. Maybe you didn’t read it, that really wouldn’t surprise anyone.
That is confirming yesterday's news. One country is much easier to deal with than 27. And that is 27 where protectionism is a top priority.Trump: US-UK trade deal 'absolutely possible'
Seems he’s changed his mind again. How is anyone supposed to take this guy seriously or at his word?
Bollocks.
So explain why it is OK to use a racist term at any time.
You don't paint a very good picture for some people. Some people think UKIP are racist. You know that they are not. Mart will agree to this. He tries to make out they are racist all the time. You think it is OK to use a racist term. And all for the reason it isn't.
I have a little test for you. Would you be happy using the term if you was standing next to a black man you didn't know who is twice your size?
That is confirming yesterday's news. One country is much easier to deal with than 27. And that is 27 where protectionism is a top priority.
And this is what many of us have been saying. But the reply from the pro EU lot is it won't be easy. Yes it won't be easy. But it will be much easier than making a deal with 27 countries at the same time.
Free pass?
The only time nobody gets a free pass off me is when someone like you comes out with one sided tales. As in defending Juncker and the EU constantly. But maybe I am finally getting through to you how bent the whole system is.
So how about pointing out where I have defended anyone. What you might find is where I have compared with others or someone has compared with others making false comments.
What you have seen me say is there is no need for UKIP if we are leaving. And they are about finished. They hardly got any votes last election. They are not like AfD in Germany and on the way up although you make out that they are insignificant although they are the third largest party in Germany. They are the biggest party in opposition.
And you also said that there are several parties that got a similar amount of votes earlier. I said to you name them. Strangely enough you ignored me.
Trump: US-UK trade deal 'absolutely possible'
Seems he’s changed his mind again. How is anyone supposed to take this guy seriously or at his word?
Try again. You have admitted that it is a racist derogatory remark. Yet you make out that it is OK to use the term. Yet you won't explain why.Read your own evidence. It gives two examples of its use. One racist, one not. You have proved beyond doubt that it’s about the context it’s used in. Congratulations.
That is confirming yesterday's news. One country is much easier to deal with than 27. And that is 27 where protectionism is a top priority.
And this is what many of us have been saying. But the reply from the pro EU lot is it won't be easy. Yes it won't be easy. But it will be much easier than making a deal with 27 countries at the same time.
Try again. You have admitted that it is a racist derogatory remark. Yet you make out that it is OK to use the term. Yet you won't explain why.
Did you think about the test I said about? Would you use it in front of a black man twice your size you didn't know?
If you wouldn't it is a term you shouldn't use at any time.
Bollocks.
So explain why it is OK to use a racist term at any time.
You don't paint a very good picture for some people. Some people think UKIP are racist. You know that they are not. Mart will agree to this. He tries to make out they are racist all the time. You think it is OK to use a racist term. And all for the reason it isn't.
I have a little test for you. Would you be happy using the term if you was standing next to a black man you didn't know who is twice your size?
Oh you are so one sided.America’s Policy is protectionism also. You seem to be saying that we’ll have as much joy doing a trade deal with the USA as people do apparently with the EU. Waste of time leaving if we are chasing the American dollar in that case.
So how much of the vote did they get? Did they all get about 1 in 8 of the German population vote for them as you are insinuating?Where have I ever defended Juncker?
The parties are: Die Linke, Greens, FDP.All about the same as AfD.
You make me laugh sometimes. So Trump and Farage are now mates :smuggrin:The first comments were put in mouth by Farage. He helped a mate out who had helped him.
I am flabbergasted. You just don't have a clue.You say 'black man'. When I gave an example of some people on the leave side not liking 'brown men' you told me off for using the term 'brown men'. Make your mind up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?