No. I have already said that the referendum was a failure either way because of the close result ( Astute will back me on that ).
If it was in favour of Remain I am not sure you would say that
The vast majority either didn't vote or voted for Europe.
Why not question the post by yourself?A million is not a vast majority.
But would you have said it if the vote went the other way?No. I have already said that the referendum was a failure either way because of the close result ( Astute will back me on that ).
But would you have said it if the vote went the other way?
It was always going to be close. I would have respected the result either way. Just like I do in a general election. The result isn't wrong just because you don't like what the result is.
Why not question the post by yourself?
"Snobish british elite" so the german chancellor is both classist and racist if your claim is correct.you keep denying being a racist - even when no-one here said you were. But you say Germany runs the EU, that a president of a Federal EU would be German and rule Britain and that you are proud to be British - that's why you voted leave and followed the elite public schoolboys wishes.
Germany does not rule the EU. They have the Same voting rights as we do. a president of a Federal EU would be elected as figure head of 28 countries consisting of 500000000 people, 80000000 of which are Germans. Even if you vote according to race and assume everyone else votes according to race ( not everyone is as racist as many leavers ), there is absolutely no way a German must win. The presidential votes on the continent go in stages so that there are only 2 main candidates to be voted for in the final ballot. The president would not rule per decree as a monarch anyway.
Your constant ill informed and race based comments confirm the suspicions of remainers ( you say you would vote leave ).
Germany's Vice Chancellor says young Britons living in Germany should be encouraged to take German citizenship as they obviously know more about the benefits of EU membership than " the snobish British elite".
"Snobish british elite" so the german chancellor is both classist and racist if your claim is correct.
Sent from my Versus TouchPad 9 using Tapatalk
Martcov lives in Germany. He wants us governed by others than ourselves. CCFC Germany lives in Germany. He wants us governed by others than ourselves.
So where am I wrong or is it just a lie?Wrong.
But I think you try die-hard to misunderstand me, so that doesn't make any sense to me.
Well there you go. You say that those that didn't vote and those that voted remain were in the majority. Then you say that those that didn't vote and those who voted leave didn't have much of a majority although it was well over a million more than the truth you tried to twist.Do you think a million is a vast majority?
Well there you go. You say that those that didn't vote and those that voted remain were in the majority. Then you say that those that didn't vote and those who voted leave didn't have much of a majority although it was well over a million more than the truth you tried to twist.
4% more voted leave than stay. Get over it.
I am the same as most people that live in the UK. We don't want to be governed by anyone but ourselves.
The only British figurehead Europe would consider is the ghastly Blair and that really says it all
He is, however, a socialist.
Therefore a 16% swing needed for a result more decisive than this. What then a 3rd 4th 5th referendum? Or perhaps the loony left could simply accept a democratic decision. It's the basis for our society and represents the very freedom that attracts so many from overseas.
I find the EU political stance very interesting - an approach that has never been tried before to my knowledge. On the one hand they have socialist/communist traits: big government; big regulation; control centralised on unelected people; wealth redistribution. However on the other they are staunchly capitalist: pro-big business; "nudging" people to do what they want by providing options and influencing economically rather than dictating; pro-trade and private enterprise.
Another factor that influenced my vote is my distrust of human nature. It doesn't take too long for bad people to take over unelected government. There is a risk that once they got their one big state that it would start swinging towards corruption and malevolent diktat.
Depends on whether the ideas for more democracy and transparency now coming forward get followed through. That is the good thing about brexit - the EU now has to be reformed in order to keep the critics at bay.
If that happens I will be extremely happy. If the EU sorted itself out I would support a Brexit rethink and I'd vote stay.
Farage said before the referendum that there should be a rerun if it was close ( he thought he would lose ). I say that we have a parliament to debate and decide on such crucial issues. There must be an election before article 50 is triggered. The referendum was not binding, but a decision by parliament is.
If we don't like what the EU does we can do nothing other than leave. If we don't like what the British politicians do we vote against them. Just like the majority who voted in the referendum did. So yes at least we have a say.I wouldn't call been governed by the Etonian elite as been governed by ourselves.
This is the same as a lot of us.If that happens I will be extremely happy. If the EU sorted itself out I would support a Brexit rethink and I'd vote stay.
You got itThink it would take 3 weeks....
Let's get it right. He never ever ever said there would be a re run. Please accept this.
If we don't like what the EU does we can do nothing other than leave. If we don't like what the British politicians do we vote against them. Just like the majority who voted in the referendum did. So yes at least we have a say.
Farage for all his faults is at least a democrat. He would accept any result. .
Well, actually he did say there should (as the comment you're quoting states) been a rerun -
"In an interview with the Mirror the Ukip leader said such a narrow margin would prompt him to fight for a second referendum.
He said: “In a 52-48 referendum this would be unfinished business by a long way."
It said if the result was ⅔-⅓ people should accept that.
Therefore it surely follows that using this theory, as it was 48-52 there should be a second referendum and Farage should support it?
If we are ever given a referendum we would have the chance to vote leave which would also go against the Etonian elite........Exactly, that's the point is they are bad for us then we get rid of them. We can. General elections or otherwise.
Answers please. How do we get rid of juncker, tusk or Schulz? The 3 biggest presidents in the EU.
Really? Nigel Farage: Narrow Remain win may lead to second referendum - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36306681
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
So nobody listens to a word Farage says as he is a racist idiot and would never have a chance of making decisions as he will never get into power. But if he says there should be a revote he must be rightReally? Nigel Farage: Narrow Remain win may lead to second referendum - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36306681
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
So nobody listens to a word Farage says as he is a racist idiot and would never have a chance of making decisions as he will never get into power. But if he says there should be a revote he must be right
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?