In reality it's a sentiment shared by a majority in the GB, especially in England and the younger generations. I'd wager most wouldn't be opposed to Irish unity, neither would the UK government. Would the Republic want to take the north on though? I doubt it.
Still doesn’t devalue the GFA. And to suggest that it only effects a small minority of the U.K. population is just moronic given that the IRA operated on the mainland. Even Gilbralter (who also got a vote in the referendum) was effected.
If I’d have been asked 3 years ago would Northern Ireland leave the U.K. and unite Ireland I would have said yes but not in my lifetime. Immediately after the referendum I would have said maybe in my lifetime, lately I would say that I wouldn’t be surprised if it happens within a decade. Still, the break up of the union was just another leave scare story so I’m sure it won’t happen.
The IRA should have paid for their crimes by the rope - the appeasement if the murdering filth was a blot on the uk history books
The GFA was a shameful act of appeasement
The GFA was delivered as the result of a referendum. A referendum that delivered a far clearer answer than Brexit by some distance. That’s democracy, get over it.
The GFA was a shameful act of appeasement
Numerous sides committed atrocities and 2 sides terrorism, funny how you never mention that.
Achieved by blowing up people eating a McDonald’s in Warrington - shame on you
You really sound like a fascist now.
All sides found freedom from the GFA as well. It wasn’t exclusive to people of Catholic faith. All sides have to ask for and give forgiveness from the troubles. The GFA has allowed that opportunity.
It’s rather nice Sick Boy likes your post and Martcov believed I’m a fascist.
Perhaps sick boy would like to explain why the shadow Chancellor voted against it and the apparent prime minister in waiting voted against its predecessor
Interesting - why?
Perhaps sick boy would like to explain why the shadow Chancellor voted against it and the apparent prime minister in waiting voted against its predecessor
If it was a war anything the IRA did was an act of war by you're logic.No it was a war
The GFA was a shameful act of appeasement
That's a pretty extreme view and very, very much in the minority in both th UK and Ireland.
If it was a war anything the IRA did was an act of war by you're logic.
Was that because the referendum kept to the rules and Juncker putting Selmayr in place broke all the rules?the referendum wasn't about Selmayr, it was about the future of the UK. I count that as more important than Juncker or Selmayr.
If the YouGov poll would have said 51% or more wanted to stay in the EU it would have been the truth to you. But because only 21% want a new vote in the YouGov poll it isn't true?If you genuinely believe that then you're very much out of touch.
Was that because the referendum kept to the rules and Juncker putting Selmayr in place broke all the rules?
Was that because the referendum kept to the rules and Juncker putting Selmayr in place broke all the rules?
Found one worded a bit better on behalf of Germany. Thought you would be happier with this one.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/miltonezrati/2018/01/23/the-german-swindle-built-into-the-euro/
You mean the leaflet drop to try and get us to remain that cost more than the budget should have been alone?The referendum didn’t keep to the rules. That is an ongoing investigation. More to come.
Anything to try and put the Selmayr fiasco into the background.Even the EC got it wrong and helped leave break the rules. Both sides lied. Leave more. Leave are under investigation for lying about financing. Banks put money from Russian sources in. If we had an independent prosecutor with powers to force people to give information coordinating the several investigations like Moeller, we would have a better picture of how the referendum was stolen. The referendum is a far bigger scandal than the Selmayr appointment. But, you aren’t following that although it effects the future of the UK.
Latest admission that it was flawed:
Elections watchdog got law wrong on Brexit donations, court rules
So what other countries have their currency tied to or share ours?Here is an opinion on the value of Britain‘s past devaluations and future devaluation as suggested by some in labour.
Subscribe to read | Financial Times
So what other countries have their currency tied to or share ours?
That is why the poor countries using the Euro will never recover until they leave it and why we do so well out of it. If we had joined the Euro we would also be fucked.
Anything to try and put the Selmayr fiasco into the background.
Have you noticed the difference between the EU and the UK?
If someone high up in the EU is found guilty of something they just say it won't happen again. If someone concerned in the leave side with Brexit dies anything wrong they get it taken all the way.
That's it then. Good that we are leaving. Single market gone. Banking authority gone. Galileo gone. Medical agency gone. Labour supply falling. Not enough British vets to control animal imports/ exports. And so on. But a fish will be destroyed instead of eaten. Pity for the fish.
You mean the leaflet drop to try and get us to remain that cost more than the budget should have been alone?
We could of course leave the EU and join the EEA. Norway has its own policy on fishing.
This post proves you don't have a clue.The opinion was that our devaluations didn't help us much, and that devaluation doesn't help as much as it used to as exporters continue to keep their dollar or euro price. Basically he is saying that it is a waste of time devaluing and that the public are worse off than they would have been. Not exactly saying that we do well out of being able to devalue. The same would apply to the poorer countries you are on about. You claim they will never recover, but the Eurozone is recovering. We will see how much being out on our own helps us when we leave the EU. Will be interesting.
Yes I do.No, it was found not be illegal in the Selmayr case, but what leave did was illegal. Spot the difference.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?