Then cannot comment on anything. The truth is that Brexit is a mess. You will call that pro EU and distorting the truth because the truth is pro remaining in the EU and you don’t like it.
You are so cool being able to find twats on Twatter that only do pro EU Twits.
How about pro Brexit comments? Neither should be allowed as they distort the truth. But here you go.
Click on comments then best comments.
Brexit news: Britons could need visas to visit France after 'no deal' | Daily Mail Online
It would all be down to the details.Personally I think the EEA option would be a fair compromise between the 2 sides. If you're bothered about keeping the UK together in the long-run, it'd be the sensible option too.
So true without you considering what you have said.It would also be the most accurate representation of the referendum.
The referendum has been hi jacked.
It would all be down to the details.
If we leave but half stay in there is a good chance we would lose the small say we do have yet be stopped from making trade deals elsewhere. And the odds are they would still want billions of pounds each year off us.
If that is the case can anybody explain a good reason to stay half in half out?
Yes. Some people just don't have a clue. That is the problem that you have with pro remain whatever and pro leave whatever.
But we do need to either stay in or get out. No half measures. That would cause more harm than anything.
It would all be down to the details.
If we leave but half stay in there is a good chance we would lose the small say we do have yet be stopped from making trade deals elsewhere. And the odds are they would still want billions of pounds each year off us.
If that is the case can anybody explain a good reason to stay half in half out?
Yes. Some people just don't have a clue. That is the problem that you have with pro remain whatever and pro leave whatever.
But we do need to either stay in or get out. No half measures. That would cause more harm than anything.
How is being in the EEA being half in half out of the EU? It's not being an EU member and therefore respects the referendum vote and goes to some way to healing divisions between the two sides.
It was put forward as an option by the likes of Farage pre-referendum.
The likes of Norway are also able to do trade deals separately to the EU, by the way, so not sure what you're referring to.
You are so cool being able to find twats on Twatter that only do pro EU Twits.
How about pro Brexit comments? Neither should be allowed as they distort the truth. But here you go.
Click on comments then best comments.
Brexit news: Britons could need visas to visit France after 'no deal' | Daily Mail Online
Funnily enough right wing populists like targeting football fans. Judging by some posts on here, they have the right idea.
How the new wave of far-right populists are using football to further their power
The NF did the same.
Funnily enough right wing populists like targeting football fans. Judging by some posts on here, they have the right idea.
How the new wave of far-right populists are using football to further their power
Which is actually part of the problem...since we joined we have drifted half in & then out around the issues of budget, currency, vetoes expansion etcYes. Some people just don't have a clue. That is the problem that you have with pro remain whatever and pro leave whatever.
But we do need to either stay in or get out. No half measures. That would cause more harm than anything.
How about doing something unusual and read all of a post instead of taking just a few words and making it sound totally different?How is being in the EEA being half in half out of the EU? It's not being an EU member and therefore respects the referendum vote and goes to some way to healing divisions between the two sides.
It was put forward as an option by the likes of Farage pre-referendum.
The likes of Norway are also able to do trade deals separately to the EU, by the way, so not sure what you're referring to.
And all you ever do is bring up Pro EU Twatter posts. Call that being a part of a debate?See, this is where you've been going wrong with this line of argument. I am fundamentally opposed to the idea of brexit. I voted to remain, just like you claim to have done. I think it is a ridiculously stupid idea to remove ourselves from a huge trading bloc. I think it's economic suicide.
Now, you keep asking me to post pro-brexit 'twats' (good one!). Why would I want to do that? I'm anti-racism, do you want me to dig up some pro-racist 'twats'? For balance? Yeah, that's a really good and well-thought out approach, isn't it? I'm against something completely so what I really need to do is advertise the opposing side's small-minded, factually inaccurate propaganda.
You'll no doubt come back with some 'so what you're saying is... ' nonsense but tbh I can't be arsed to get into a debate with someone who just likes to argue for argument's sake.
How about doing something unusual and read all of a post instead of taking just a few words and making it sound totally different?
So what did the very first line say? Oh yes. It would all be down to the details.
So if we were in the EEA we would not necessarily be in the EU. So we wouldn't have the small say we do now. But The EEA IS the area in which the agreement on the EEA provides for the freedom of movement of persons, goods, services and capital within the European single market, including the freedom to choose residence in any country within this area.
So what would the use of leaving the EU when we are tied by the same rules and regulations?
How has Britain's say in the EU been 'small', it has always been equal to other members'.
Making up things again I see.If you are in favour of deregulation and lowering our standards, how would you propose dealing with the Irish border?
How has Britain's say in the EU been 'small', it has always been equal to other members'.
The veto doesn't stop those at the top doing what they want.And we’ve always had the veto.
Making up things again I see.
And I take it you now admit that you were wrong on what you said against my post.
And now you want me to continue to hit my head against a brick wall saying that the Ireland problem would be much easier to solve if we knew what we had to solve. If we have a free trade agreement there would be much less to consider. But the EU wants us to solve the Ireland border problem before we know what problems we have to solve. I have posted links saying the same. It is nothing but a way to stop us from leaving.
Who said conclude a deal?If you genuinely think it would be better to conclude a trade deal before securing the withdrawal agreement, then you really are clueless.
I see you still have no response to having an open border with Ireland while having different regulations to the EU.
That is why I have said a fair deal or no deal. We either leave or don't. Leaving isn't half staying in the EU where they call all the shots and hamper us in the future.Let’s stop going on about it and get out with no deal,That will upset the remoaners and the bbc and maybe Martcov will start contributing on the CCFC general chat pages?
I reckon he doesn’t even like football just likes to moan.
The people spoke you win some you lose some,Deal with it
I voted out that doesn’t mean I am a racist football thug!!!
Who said conclude a deal?
I said see what offer is available so we know what to work with.
No deal on anything will be finalised until every little thing has been argued about. That will take many years at this rate. And no that shouldn't be the reason for remaining in the EU.
When did the EU say that?Both sides have said that they want to have a deep and comprehensive free trade deal!!
The issue is how to have an open border when the UK is looking to deregulate and sign deals with the USA, which would be wanting to export goods to the UK that would be illegal in the RoI.
The veto only applies in certain areas since the Lisbon treaty.And we’ve always had the veto. Which when used is the final word.
Let’s stop going on about it and get out with no deal,That will upset the remoaners and the bbc and maybe Martcov will start contributing on the CCFC general chat pages?
I reckon he doesn’t even like football just likes to moan.
The people spoke you win some you lose some,Deal with it
I voted out that doesn’t mean I am a racist football thug!!!
The veto doesn't stop those at the top doing what they want.
Most were pissed off about Selmayr. Germany was happy. If Germany was pissed off it wouldn't have happened.
The veto only applies in certain areas since the Lisbon treaty.
Lisbon Treaty: more of Britain's powers surrendered to Brussels
And all you ever do is bring up Pro EU Twatter posts. Call that being a part of a debate?
Yes you can't defend their crookedness so zzzzzZzzzzz Salmayr zzzzzzz
Blue passports. Duh.Put up the benefits of Brexit then.
Make your mind up.In many ways the Lisbon Treaty was the beginning of the end for many of the EU and I get that point. If Gordon Brown and Parliament had have delivered a referendum on it I’m not sure I would have voted for it. We still have a veto though so to suggest that we have had little say is nonsense. Although clearly the Lisbon Treaty diminished some of our say. I wouldn’t argue otherwise.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?