So remainers were happy with a remainer taking us out?Remainers she her as a traitor? Was is this, a playground?
So remainers were happy with a remainer taking us out?
And yes you are right. The amount of remainers that have gone as low a level as the playground is sad.
Bullshit again.I attacked horse racing and blood sport you moron not the U.K. I never mentioned anyone else in the EU because someone was trying to say that we don’t have a culture of being cruel to animals when we clearly do and it’s spread across all walks of society. That’s not the same as saying that the EU doesn’t have a problem and only we do because the whole world has a problem from dancing bears in Russia to elephant rides in Asia. You’re a moron if you think any corner of the world doesn’t have a culture of cruelty to animals because it’s clearly a worldwide phenomenon. You brought up horse meat you idiot not me so stop bullshitting. And it doesn’t matter horse, cow, pig, sheep, cat or dog. You eat any of them you’re eating a sentient being who all have an equal right not to be eaten regardless of where that is. Not eating horse meat doesn’t make us better than the French it just makes us fussier eaters.
I don’t think number 3 is legitimate. I do think there should have been a larger proportion to 51.7-;48.3 for such a momentous decisionJacob Rees-Mogg was right when he said the PM has lost the confidence of Parliament. The government is in a position where it cannot pass the deal of what it was elected to do. The result here is the government seeking a renewed mandate and calling a general election. However, with the timeline of the scheduled exit, that wouldn’t solve the issue completely. So, the logical conclusion would be a second referendum to sort the issue.
Leave won by a slender margin in 2016, and there was elements of deception in their campaign and promises made that couldn’t be kept. If this was an elected government, they’d be held accountable here. Regardless, in 2018 the public knows what Brexit looks like so it can either reject or accept Brexit with greater confidence than in 2016. Public opinion changes, and if it chose to change its mind in another referendum, it has the right to do so. Just as the result in 2016 was legitimate, so would the result of a second one? They’re both plebiscites. If polls are accurate, which of course they can be wrong, Remain would actually win by a larger margin than Leave did in 2016. If the public was still committed to Brexit, then so be it, the Brexiteers would be strengthened which is good for delivering Brexit. On the other hand, if the public changes its mind and rejects Brexit, it can do. The only reason to deny a referendum is people who are politically motivated Brexiteers who don’t want to risk losing. This isn’t really about following the ‘people’s will’ because if it was, the public would vote Leave again. It’s plain and simple.
Good reasons for a second referendum:
1. The government is physically incapable to deliver Brexit.
2. The 2016 referendum didn’t define what Brexit would look like. Public has the right to accept or reject the terms of any agreement.
3. Polls indicate a vote now would flip the result, by a larger margin than that ‘people’s will’ of 2016.
You’re wrong when you say there are no ‘good reasons’ for a second referendum.
So it wasn't you mentioning playgrounds when talking about remainers not happy with May?To label someone a traitor to either side is pathetic. Ahh yes, claiming to be neutral, and obviously you are only able to call out remainers - hahaha
ParanoiaThey're perfectly capable they just refuse to do it because they've been EU-stooges all along.
They're perfectly capable they just refuse to do it because they've been EU-stooges all along.
Do you just ignore the evidence? If we walk away it will affect us more than anyone else. Sure it will affect nations in the Eu but the hit is split across 27 countries. You know this so why are you ignoring it?Look, surely we have to walk away from the only bullshit deal the EU are agreeing to and digging in their heals on. It's time to walk and say thanks, we tried but you can stuff your bias divorce settlement and throw things up in the air for them bastards. The only ones suffering with this chaos is us right now so it's time to let them have something to think about.
Yep I am watching this thread as I tend not to be overly knowledgeable on the subject and there seems to be lots of ‘experts’ on this one!I try not to get too involved in this thread, because there is an awful lot of repetition and a lot of going round and round in circles.
Has a anyone at all changed their viewpoint on this thread and gone from remain to leave, or leave to remain? Anyone?
I find it all very simple (though maybe I am just simple).
I voted to remain, but fully accepted the will of the people.
Surely now though, things have changed. They very clearly have.
Did any of us envisage this mess 2 and a half years on?
Seems obvious this is a bad deal. a vast majority of MP's say it is. Labour, SNP, Plaid Cymru, the Green Party, the Lib Dems and the DUP all say it is. Many, many Tories say it is.
Real danger now of no deal. Is that what the public really want? Is that what they voted for? A Brexit at any cost?
If we were all told we will be worse off after Brexit would people then still have voted leave?
I have never called for another referendum, but surely all options now have to be on the table.
As I say, I haven't called for another referendum, but if there is to be one, I wouldn't see it as any kind of betrayal at all.
Things have changed and I don't think any of us thought we would be here, right where we are now with just over 3 months to go did we?
I think everyone agrees it is a mess.
All options to extricate us from this mess have to be considered don't they?
At the very least the government can put this deal to the people and see if they are happy with it or not.
I don’t think number 3 is legitimate. I do think there should have been a larger proportion to 51.7-;48.3 for such a momentous decision
Yes it is pathetic.To label someone a traitor to either side is pathetic. Ahh yes, claiming to be neutral, and obviously you are only able to call out remainers - hahaha
Don’t worry mart, you’ll get your second referendum and Remain will win.
You’ll celebrate stopping Brexit but you will only have delayed it.
It is Mays deal being a bad deal that is stopping it going through.Please stop talking nonsense, you’re just wrong. Its mainly the DUP and ERG MPs (Brexiteer Tory backbenchers) which is stopping Theresa May’s Brexit deal.
The UK had a history of eating horse meat up until the 1930s, I’m not sure what qualifies one animal as being okay to eat and not the other.Bullshit again.
So where was the badger baiting? Where was the fox hunting? Where is the Grand national held where you said horses get killed every year?
Not fussy eaters so there is nothing wrong with the French eating it? Next time you will say it is just as OK to eat dogs and cats as they are also animals.
I brought up eating horse meat? Would you like me to prove you to be a liar again?
So all remainers trust May? This is basically what you are saying. Because you are saying so.
Ask Tony. He moaned about us liking horse racing and how they go for horse meat. He had a go at our badger baiting. He had a go at our fox hunting. Trying to work out what it has to do with Brexit.The UK had a history of eating horse meat up until the 1930s, I’m not sure what qualifies one animal as being okay to eat and not the other.
Ask Tony. He moaned about us liking horse racing and how they go for horse meat. He had a go at our badger baiting. He had a go at our fox hunting. Trying to work out what it has to do with Brexit.
No it isn't.Errr...no I’m not, yet again it’s your warped attempts at putting words into someone’s mouth.
Yes your normal line.
How about quoting my post where I made the comment? Then say I only mentioned one side as you always say. And then tell me which part of it is wrong.
Who was it then?I agree, it has nothing to do with Brexit but it wasn’t him who originally brought it up.
No it isn't.
So I say it again. Quote the post that you pretend is against remainers. Show the post to be one sided like you say. Then say which part is untruthful. Because you are now denying that it is untruthful after saying that it was.
Quoted what?I was originally referring to the post I quoted above, hence why I quoted it
The post you had a go at?Ffs I’ve already quoted it above.
Who was it then?
It is Mays deal being a bad deal that is stopping it going through.
The post you had a go at?
Do i need to put it up for you?
I've seen some well presented arguments for the case for a second referendum but none that have convinced me it is the right thing to do so I still don't support the idea.There's not a single justified argument for a second referendum. Just because it gets shouted out a lot doesn't mean anything sensible.
If Brexit did ever get overturned then it would confirm what a lot of people had thought in the first place. You're simply not allowed to leave the EU. Considering the ones on here that wax lyrical about how everyone is becoming Nazis - I'd say the above is actually exactly the kind of behaviour they'd be proud of.
Maybe as leave won, there could be another vote with a list of options to choose from, but only the winners of the 2016 referendum can vote? That can then get implemented. I guess that's fair...
Here it is again SB.This was always going to be the problem of having a pro EU organising a leave deal. Deep down she doesn't want to do it. There is a lack of trust in her all round. Remainers see her as a traitor. Leavers don't believe she wants to make a deal. The opposition leader who has always wanted out of the EU now says he wants us in. The EU sees massive divisions in the UK. And they have taken full advantage.
Quoted what?
You said my post was anti remainers. Your normal line. Then you said I was putting words in your mouth because I questioned your opinion of it.
No, the Nazis are the ones telling everyone else how to vote.
It is insane that the result can not be respected.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?