Sick Boy
Super Moderator
It would also be disastrous for Britain and the EU knows this too.
I'm not sure what the final outcome will be, but I know the EU have had to play a very hard line, they can't afford to show any weakness to the UK because that would undermine the whole project. I do know that (even though they are trying to hide it well) that the EU is considered to be on the brink of recession by leading financial experts with Germany considered to go very soon. A no deal brexit would be disastrous for them so I think some last minute concessions will be made to force through an agreement.
1970’s went really well
Or maybe pandering to the noisy minority remain vote camp
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I'm not sure what the final outcome will be, but I know the EU have had to play a very hard line, they can't afford to show any weakness to the UK because that would undermine the whole project. I do know that (even though they are trying to hide it well) that the EU is considered to be on the brink of recession by leading financial experts with Germany considered to go very soon. A no deal brexit would be disastrous for them so I think some last minute concessions will be made to force through an agreement.
They have foind it easy enough to change things & allow an extension when the chips are down...so I feel sure it can actually be easily undone
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I'm not saying it wouldn't SB, I'm sick of the whole thing. I'm embarrassed by our entire political establishment, me, you and crazy Dave from down the pub could have sorted this in a far more efficient manner than these bunch of halfwits.It would also be disastrous for Britain and the EU knows this too.
They haven’t allowed anything yet. Currently being debated amongst the 27 in Brussels as we speak and the debate was expected to end 2 hours ago.
Yes I understand them...you clearly have issues with them - what are they?Do you understand what the red lines are? They’re the voice of leave and more specifically the ERG. I can only assume that was a joke.
True...but the draft communique indicates quite strongly that an extension until 22nd May (or perhaps misheard & it is 22 votes on what they call May's deal?) Is being widely reportedThey haven’t allowed anything yet. Currently being debated amongst the 27 in Brussels as we speak and the debate was expected to end 2 hours ago.
Oh right...ignore my last post then lolJust finished. Extension to the 12th of May.
I think that was my point Fern (you don't mind if I call you Fern?) they can't afford a no deal anymore than we can so I think a compromise will have to be made, and It will be down to the wire.I would be surprised, maybe some cosmetic concessions but nothing fundamental. Deal or not, an EU recession is not help to the UK, particularly Germany as it is a massive export market for us.
Yes I understand them...you clearly have issues with them - what are they?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Oh right...ignore my last post then lol
Either way, they agreed to change the leave date pretty easily & quickly
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
And all the drama & posturing is...welll...frankly - boring!I think that was my point Fern (you don't mind if I call you Fern?) they can't afford a no deal anymore than we can so I think a compromise will have to be made, and It will be down to the wire.
I merely asked the questionParliament has an issue with them. I’m flabbergasted that you think she wrote them to pander to remain. You’ve got to be on the wind up.
Lol...Ignore mine too. I meant April not May.
And here comes one of them comments that I said about. And agreed by those who I said about.Zzz
You're being a dick even when people are trying to agree with you.
So I gave you a link from the Guardian. Not a paper to praise Labour in any way normally.Think it was more the economy being about to collapse
And here comes one of them comments that I said about. And agreed by those who I said about.
When I said about John Smith turning around the Labour party you said
So I gave you a link from the Guardian. Not a paper to praise Labour in any way normally.
And look at the reply from yourself. You tried to make out it was not Smith but a financial crash that got Labour in. Then you said you agreed with me.
Yeah OK.
What's quite funny at the minute is the Tory boasts about low unemployment, lowest level since erm 1975. Sometimes the pictures painted of history don't always align to other things you say.
You see this is what people who've never negotiated a deal don't get. They swallow Guardian garbage like 'cliff edge' and 'crash out' without understanding that the best way to get a great deal, a close trading relationship, is to walk away.
No deal = great deal.
And here comes the pathetic comments.Wrong the comment was in response to ‘Blair got out when he was found out’. I encounter schoolboys with vastly superior comprehension to this
Starmer has been the one for me for a long time. He had a successful career before going into politics. He isn't in politics for the money or to have a career. He always worked to help people in need as a barrister. And he was also DPP and Head of the Crown Prosecution Service.
What's quite funny at the minute is the Tory boasts about low unemployment, lowest level since erm 1975. Sometimes the pictures painted of history don't always align to other things you say.
I can't think of anyone else in the Labour party better than Sir Keir Starmer. He is already respected around the world for the work he did before joining politics with Labour. He is highly educated in international matters. His whole career has been to help the man on the street.Starmer comes across well, he would take the party in a more pro EU direction for sure. Is he leadership material and could he unite the left of the party and the Blairites?
And here comes the pathetic comments.
If you were clear on what you are saying everyone could understand. I spoke about John Smith and you said only because of the recession. How was I supposed to know your reply was about half a sentence in a post? Because if you knew your history you would know that John Smith came to prominence around the time of a recession.
Or is you taking the piss out of me your get out clause for being wrong?
Have it your way. So you don't see at all how what you wrote could be misjudged?I’m taking the piss because you’re consistently bad at comprehension. Really quite embarrassing
parliament ignored last 2nd referendum petition which had about 2,5m.I see the revoke article 50 petition is gathering steam
Petition: Revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU.
In the interest of balance here’s the leave without a deal petition
Petition: Leave the EU without a deal in March 2019.
According to the old Rowan Atkinson sketch Hell is already full with Germans & French
Have it your way. So you don't see at all how what you wrote could be misjudged?
Constantly bad at comprehension? Don't worry. Have had enough of those constantly taking the piss. Won't join in with your questions anymore. Even said what I thought you was up to. Look back. It is all there.
Parliament seems to ignore most petitions to be fair. Location of the voter is logged and there is a link to an interactive map if you want to see where the votes are being cast from. Not expecting it to but it would be interesting to see what reaction the government would have if the number of signatures passed the number who voted leave.parliament ignored last 2nd referendum petition which had about 2,5m.
Media already writing off Revoke petition as original remainers, londoners , students and possible 3rd country involvement.
Balance is if Revoke became the likelihood the no deal petition would gather speed as well.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?