Darth Robins
Well-Known Member
They use 50fps cameras, nowhere near enough to actually keep up properly with the speed of the game.
The game has gone (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter pusbccfc
- Start date
They use 50fps cameras, nowhere near enough to actually keep up properly with the speed of the game.
larry_david
Well-Known Member
There's no conspiracy. It's simply a rushed decision with a shoddy man made line and the var has bottled the big decision in favour of the big club
Actually maybe it is a conspiracy
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
Still don't think it was offside but i think we were a bit fortunate with the penalty, if it's not given no way was VAR overturning it and awarding penalty imo
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Wasn’t an obvious error. That’s how VAR is supposed to be used.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
If that offside was obvious then I don’t know what to say
stupot07
Well-Known Member
To be fair, I thought O'Hare should have had one 5 minutes before when McGuire had two hands on him, pulling him back.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Alan Dugdales Moustache
Well-Known Member
I agree. Let them go and restructure the entire football league. No one will really miss them and I for one would prefer a league where at least a dozen teams have a genuine chance of winning the title .
Until then I'm happy with us playing in a proper division.
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
Yea the maguire one is those that are rarely given as pens but commonly given as free kicks everywhere else
shepardo01
Well-Known Member
mark82
Super Moderator
The fact they even draw lines irks me. If you need a line to tell then it's level. The rule has always been that level is onside.
Last edited:
mark82
Super Moderator
Pointless, won't get the result overturned.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Cost us £1m at least. I’m not sure Doug would agree that’s pointless.
Paul Anthony
Well-Known Member
Most we'd get is an apology, that's if they even have the brass to acknowledge they made a mistake and got it wrong.
Otis
Well-Known Member
Well said. If you are having to draw a line, then it's not clear and obvious.
shepardo01
Well-Known Member
It really needs to be appealed.
messiahrobins
Well-Known Member
I keep saying it..issue a court claim. That was corruption in plain sight and the lamestream media glossed over it if you noticed tonight on BBC, they knew that was fraud.
When I read the BBC football report earlier, there wasn’t even a mention of the offside. Might have changed now as it was early when I checked. But still, it was the most talked about part of the game and therefore focused on in the report.
messiahrobins
Well-Known Member
The lamestream media will not mention it as it was so blatantly corrupt. Thats why they are all now ganging up on Nottingham Forest as they basically have said VAR is open to manipulation.
TV companies, written media, the Government are all part of the corruption that has been endemic in football now for 25 years. Today i can guarantee was a moment when TV executives and the FA said disallow that goal as we will lose millions if its not a Manchester derby.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I don’t care much about being able to be thrashed by Man C, but I would quite like the extra £1.5m prize money that’s just been robbed from us.
Robinshio
Well-Known Member
For me it is the best comeback in fa cup history that we have been robbed of. Not one person I know out of non city supporters who all got drawn in by the game believe it was offside. We were cheated end of
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
I watched us all through L2, went to Brum, all the shit a lot of us went through and stuck with the club but I think if we went up and I had to put up with the VAR bollocks week in and week out I'd end up jacking it in.
Its killing the game and not fit for purpose.
Its killing the game and not fit for purpose.
NortonSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
Well it isn’t your day and now if you are on you are off.
Completely gutted by that terrible corruption. CCFC should have that legally investigated and push for compensation. Total travesty that makes a mockery of sport in general.
Fantastic performances like ours yesterday should be lauded as transformational and inspiring to all teams not quickly quashed by media and business gurus fearing missing out on a bit of extra profit.
Fantastic performances like ours yesterday should be lauded as transformational and inspiring to all teams not quickly quashed by media and business gurus fearing missing out on a bit of extra profit.
shepardo01
Well-Known Member
Have a look at this!!!
Otis
Well-Known Member
Well, yeah, that does look very much in our favour. It is the wrong angle though unfortunately.
Happy_Martian
Well-Known Member
But that is not the intent of VAR. It's not supposed to be a microscope on the game for 90/120 mins. It's to ensure that players don't con the ref and any CLEAR and OBVIOUS reffing errors are corrected.
How was being less than an inch offside either clear or an obvious error ?
How long did it take for them to find an "error" ?
And there's still some debate whether the lines were drawn accurately. Some pics show the line being drawn OVER Wan Bissaka's toes, moving it further away from their goal and meaning Wright was more offside than he may have been. And there are two pics, one where Cal has struck the ball and it's already moving (the one they used) or a frame where the ball hasn't moved yet (no lines, unused by VAR). Again, Clear and Obvious error ?
This can and will be argued for days or weeks ahead.
Game has ended, result is in the books. We can feel aggrieved but nothing will change. Think I'll be in the garden on Cup Final day. If's its pelting down with rain, all the better
Happy_Martian
Well-Known Member
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
The point being though Wright wasn't an inch offside.
They have done their best to disallow it and the only proof they can provide is a single still taken before O'Hare has made the pass and they've drawn the defender's line further up the field, over the top of Wan Bissaka's boot.
If this is the best they've got then there is no way it is offside and the clear and obvious error here is the application of VAR which is clearly used to manipulate the result in favour of Man Utd.
Happy_Martian
Well-Known Member
Simply put, VAR should not have been involved in that decision. If the ref didn't give it on the pitch, why were they putting their tuppence worth in ? Same with the Thomas possible handball off the back of his shoulder
Edit: and I was responding to SBTs comment. You've effectively repeated what I said back to me. But thanks
