This Summer (1 Viewer)

Gibbo

Well-Known Member
...which also means JCS may not be the answer
 

long way home

Well-Known Member
MR will see all the stats and I'm sure will address the weak points within the squad. The defensive unit seems to have some issues, individually they look ok but show inconsistency as a unit and as individuals. From what I've seen they lack organizations, vocal leadership and in someways the attitude to be tough when we are backed up.

You have to pay for these types of player and we need 2. Hyam and Rose are very capable but at this point most see weaknesses, we have to build on clean sheets as we are very capable of creating and scoring chances. As a team if you can't keep the ball out you feel more pressure to score the chances you have to get the right result.

So MR needs to improve this area and invest in a couple of older heads who love to defend and be vocal is getting those around them to understand a role within the unit.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
Who could we target at CB then? Like the feel of Michal Helik from Barnsley and could very much suit the central role. Beyond that, would it prove too rich for us to be going after some of the decent L1 centre backs? Oxford always seem to have a quality CB and this year it’s Luke McNally but I think we’d be struggling to get someone like him in!
 

long way home

Well-Known Member
It's going to be tough because MR wants a footballing CBs and I don't think he moves away from that. But results have shown us that sometimes you need to dig in, fight for the second ball and be willing to shout and organize players around you that are caught watching.

It's an art and comes at a cost in money and in sacrifices on a ethos on how you see the game played. If we don't get this balance right we will forever be in the same situation where we will beat most teams by creating a lot of chances but lose to smarter teams that sit in and takes opportunities within a game.

I'm sure they are some about and if we can generate money through transfer fees, releasing players and additional income with. ST sales. Then we can compete to pay the extra we need to secure the better quality player. It will make a difference if we can bring in players that take pride in clean sheets, have the ability to focus and keep all around them solid for the whole game. They need to create a attitude, we have created it with the ball, now we need to create it without, it's costs but the balance of that type takes you to the next level.
 
Last edited:

Frostie

Well-Known Member
Lots of people say Hyam is shit at passing but the stats always say the opposite. He's very underrated.

The X-Axis on that graphic is how often he makes progressive passes (& runs) though rather than his success. Tells a lot more about style of play of both team & individual than ability really.

I think it's overplayed a little that Hyam can't pass, he has improved no end in this regard, but his pass accuracy (and aerial duel success) is the lowest of our 4 main CB's but then, as evidenced, some of that will be down to him playing more progressively than Fadz for example.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
The X-Axis on that graphic is how often he makes progressive passes (& runs) though rather than his success. Tells a lot more about style of play of both team & individual than ability really.

I think it's overplayed a little that Hyam can't pass, he has improved no end in this regard, but his pass accuracy (and aerial duel success) is the lowest of our 4 main CB's but then, as evidenced, some of that will be down to him playing more progressively than Fadz for example.

I think a lot of it is down to role in the team. Fadz gets forwards less and tends to pass side to side so comes out worse.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
The X-Axis on that graphic is how often he makes progressive passes (& runs) though rather than his success. Tells a lot more about style of play of both team & individual than ability really.

I think it's overplayed a little that Hyam can't pass, he has improved no end in this regard, but his pass accuracy (and aerial duel success) is the lowest of our 4 main CB's but then, as evidenced, some of that will be down to him playing more progressively than Fadz for example.

Looking solely at pass accuracy and saying he's the worst passer is a bit disingenuous though. There's more to it than that.

He's only 1.44% less accurate than the next worse. Given he attempts 58.6 passes per game that means he misplaces 0.8 passes per game more than JCS, i.e. nothing really.

He completes more passes in the opposition half than any of the other 3.

Only JCS makes more forward passes than him.

Looking at the stats I'd say JCS has the worst passing stats of them all, but they're all pretty similar really.
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
Looking solely at pass accuracy and saying he's the worst passer is a bit disingenuous though. There's more to it than that.

He's only 1.44% less accurate than the next worse. Given he attempts 58.6 passes per game that means he misplaces 0.8 passes per game more than JCS, i.e. nothing really.

He completes more passes in the opposition half than any of the other 3.

Only JCS makes more forward passes than him.

Looking at the stats I'd say JCS has the worst passing stats of them all, but they're all pretty similar really.

It would be a little disingenuous agreed, which is exactly why I didn't say it. I was just providing context.

They're all pretty good in fairness. The frustration I think some have with Hyam, & for me even more so with Rose, is inconsistency - they can go from playing some incredible progressive passes to misplacing really simple ones.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Rose on his day is next level with his distribution, he can really pick a good pass into the midfield and we’re a lot less predictable out of defence when he’s doing it. JCS as well with his drives out of defence and his pass selection.

I do still hold out hope for Rose, but he’s been very poor in his recent spell and had a couple of mares.
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
Rose on his day is next level with his distribution, he can really pick a good pass into the midfield and we’re a lot less predictable out of defence when he’s doing it. JCS as well with his drives out of defence and his pass selection.

I do still hold out hope for Rose, but he’s been very poor in his recent spell and had a couple of mares.

Totally agree. On paper Rose has everything you would want but since promotion he's never managed to put a consistent run of good form together.
A lot of the time he's been disrupted by injury of course but now, without real competition for his place these last few games, this is the time he really needs to step up.
 

SAJ

Well-Known Member
You remember us playing one up front because we’ve got no one else, blooding kids who are nowhere ready, putting two keepers on the bench, making no subs and injuring players because we are using the bench as a nursery and having our squad fall down the league because they’ve played more minutes than anyone else in the division I assume?
But this is where you are so wrong. We have 4 players who have played the most minutes in the top 75. Huddersfield have 6, Blackburn 5, Middlesbrough 5, Forest 5 all who are above us.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
But this is where you are so wrong. We have 4 players who have played the most minutes in the top 75. Huddersfield have 6, Blackburn 5, Middlesbrough 5, Forest 5 all who are above us.

Thats a funny way to look at it. We’ve got the fewest number of players used in the division. We’ve played the same amount of minutes (more if you believe salty opposition managers), so we’re doing the same with less.
 

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
I'd still have Ostigard back
[/QUOTE
Talking Ostigard I was watching the pre-match build up on telly for the Liverpool/Man City semi and there was a piece about John Stone I was only half listening it was something about winning headers I think and Stone was top of a list second was Osti on 80% so I’m assuming it was Europe wide, interesting, Tried winding program back but couldn’t, think I’d have him back middle of a back three too.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I'd still have Ostigard back
I'd be looking at other options as well, but I think we could do worse. Certainly as a younger replacement for the Fadz role. Would likely have a half decent chance of getting him too, assuming his ego can accept he's not about to be fought over by the top European teams.
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
Something sisu obviously doesn’t agree with, a relatively modest investment in January might have given us that little boost to get at least into the play offs.

The thing is they are investors throwing some cash at the club and hoping for promotion is more like gambling.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The thing is they are investors throwing some cash at the club and hoping for promotion is more like gambling.

Which is what high risk speculators are all about surely
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Which is what high risk speculators are all about surely
As we know however, when such an approach failed it led to years of pain.

Given who owns us, I'd rather we didn't do that again!
 
  • Like
Reactions: PVA

SAJ

Well-Known Member
Thats a funny way to look at it. We’ve got the fewest number of players used in the division. We’ve played the same amount of minutes (more if you believe salty opposition managers), so we’re doing the same with less.
So just because we’ve used the fewest amount of players our player are mote tired than others. That all depends on how many minutes each player has played surely, just because you have used less players it doesn’t mean they are more tired.
At what stage do players fall into the “tired” category? It would be reasonable to assume we’ll above 50% of minutes available to play given they are professional athletes? At 65% of available minutes we’ve had 8 players who have completed that, 5 teams have had more and both Derby and Bournemouth have had 14. That suggests 65% is too low. Let’s then assume you become tired at 80% which is most probably a more realistic figure. We’ve had 4 players hit that figure the same as 6 other teams in the league but less than 5 others.
Using those statistics is far more accurate than saying we’ve used 25 players and Birmingham used 35 so all our players are more tired than anyone else.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
So just because we’ve used the fewest amount of players our player are mote tired than others. That all depends on how many minutes each player has played surely, just because you have used less players it doesn’t mean they are more tired.
At what stage do players fall into the “tired” category? It would be reasonable to assume we’ll above 50% of minutes available to play given they are professional athletes? At 65% of available minutes we’ve had 8 players who have completed that, 5 teams have had more and both Derby and Bournemouth have had 14. That suggests 65% is too low. Let’s then assume you become tired at 80% which is most probably a more realistic figure. We’ve had 4 players hit that figure the same as 6 other teams in the league but less than 5 others.
Using those statistics is far more accurate than saying we’ve used 25 players and Birmingham used 35 so all our players are more tired than anyone else.

Youre just picking random cut offs to prove your point. Are you seriously claiming that we haven’t suffered from having a smaller squad than everyone else this season? I’d have thought anyone who has watched us would find that laughable.
 

SAJ

Well-Known Member
Youre just picking random cut offs to prove your point. Are you seriously claiming that we haven’t suffered from having a smaller squad than everyone else this season? I’d have thought anyone who has watched us would find that laughable.
So your using 1 meaningless statistic to try and defend yours. I’m just pointing out that there are a variety of ways you can assess tiredness. If you look at the teams that have most of their players playing around the 80% mark they tend to be towards the top of the division. For example Bournemouth, Forest, Huddersfield, Middlesbrough. A consistent team tends to perform better.
Yes I’ve no doubt some of our players are tired but no more so than most teams
If your looking at players used Millwall have used 1 player more and are above us. QPR have used 2 more Huddersfield 2 more.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
Anyone got a stat on how often we make injured players keep playing? Kane was flogged into the ground about 4 games straight when it was clear he was injured, purely because we didn’t have a viable option otherwise.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
So your using 1 meaningless statistic to try and defend yours. I’m just pointing out that there are a variety of ways you can assess tiredness. If you look at the teams that have most of their players playing around the 80% mark they tend to be towards the top of the division. For example Bournemouth, Forest, Huddersfield, Middlesbrough. A consistent team tends to perform better.
Yes I’ve no doubt some of our players are tired but no more so than most teams
If your looking at players used Millwall have used 1 player more and are above us. QPR have used 2 more Huddersfield 2 more.

I disagree. I think we hit a wall and have lost players for longer because of playing them too long or coming back earlier. Maybe QPR and Huddersfield have too, I wouldn’t know I’m not a fan. But I think for a team like ours with little quality past the first XI and players playing at their maximum it was a limiting factor. The stat just backs that thought up, it’s not the catalyst for it.
 

Tea & Busquets

Well-Known Member
Who could we target at CB then? Like the feel of Michal Helik from Barnsley and could very much suit the central role. Beyond that, would it prove too rich for us to be going after some of the decent L1 centre backs? Oxford always seem to have a quality CB and this year it’s Luke McNally but I think we’d be struggling to get someone like him in!
McNally is apparently catching the eyes of premier league clubs. If I were to go League One, I like the looks of Jack Tucker, Ross Sykes. Warren O'Hora and Harry Darling.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top