what bit do you struggle to understand? the info he supplied on the live stream was in the public domain. he got the names from the bbc website ffs.
Surely the donations were for his cause rather than him to buy a house? (if true).
Easy money. Wonder how many donated because of the stuff he made up about his time in prison because they fell for it / felt sorry for him?
So basically he wasn’t exposing this gang because no one else was then? Like Tommy and his followers were claiming at the time.
There’s a lot of having your cake and eating it here.
Either way he’s clearly bullshiting about something. Which is his MO anyway so not surprising.
So he is making a living from what exactly? Will be be donating to the victims of the sex gangs? Using it to try and help uncover some that aren't in the public domain?how else is he gonna make a living? he spends his time up and down the country as a journalist. FYI he was already a millionaire befor the edl set up. he’s not as daft as he looks or gets portrayed
So he is making a living from what exactly? Will be be donating to the victims of the sex gangs? Using it to try and help uncover some that aren't in the public domain?
what’s he bullshiting about?
as for the comment no one reported it. it was a reference to the 1000’s Muslim gangs raping young white girls. it’s came out that many covered up due to upsetin ethic minority’s. the fact he was going to these trials raised it. the mainstream parties hardly mentioned it. if so page 20 in small print
No, I'm saying if he's going to be hailed a hero, journo and campaigner then he could go undercover to find the gangs who haven't been arrested and charged already?I ain’t his fucking accountant? We all know legal fees ain’t cheap. If people pay for his fund then so be it. surely that’s what the police should be doing? he gets slated for raising the issue now your saying he should do more. the saying dammed if you dammed if you dont comes to mind
The premise was that he had to cover it because the mainstream wasn’t. Now all of a sudden he wasn’t doing anything that the mainstream wasn’t. So you tell me was the mainstream covering or not? He’s claimed both. Which one was bullshit because clearly one version is. He’s a con man using the pain of innocent victims of crime to raise his profile because he’s an attention seeker. He’s an absolute scum bag.
No, I'm saying if he's going to be hailed a hero, journo and campaigner then he could go undercover to find the gangs who haven't been arrested and charged already?
If he starts going all investigative and uncovers things then fair play, not stuff that's already in the public domain anyway.
Like I said, it's like me running in at the end of a boxing match when somebody is already down and trying to take credit for the knockout.
What you are making out is that it's somehow his living to do what he did? What has he actually uncovered?
Imagine how many donations he got based on the lies he said spouted about his time inside.
he’s a hero because he speaks out against what many believe is a corrupt society both polictal and in the press. the media in this country are scum and treat the British public like scum. He’s been raising the issue for years. This was newsnight back in 2011. the media said he was lying.
Which is all well and good if he didn't spout lies himself which makes him no better?
The lies that were put out about his time in prison which would have helped donations massively. Just go back through the thread to see all of that disproved.what lies? Your telling he’s the only person ever to lie? if lying is his only downfall then your scrapping the barrell
he’s highlihting the issue which other outlets don’t show. so you said he broke the law at the start of this thread. now we know that’s bollox. raise his profile? he’s giving people the voice and platform to talk. white working class people are now the minority and he’s standing up for that. if you think he’s scum and not the political elite your deluded. Stick to your people’s vote freaks like Saturday. these are the teal scum. Look at the state of them. embarrassing
And you wouldn't ?Surely donations will be to an entity / charity rather than him personally?
I'd take a couple of months inside for that. Easy money.
Wouldn't come out looking like an 11 year old lesbian either.
And you wouldn't ?
Well that can't be true as we have all been told it was only Robinson who would expose them and if he hadn't done it nobody would have known about it.what bit do you struggle to understand? the info he supplied on the live stream was in the public domain. he got the names from the bbc website ffs.
His journalistic skills make the Coventry Telegraph seem Pulitzer Prize worthy.What you are making out is that it's somehow his living to do what he did?
Sorry Nick, was flicking thru and didn't read your text properly.No, hence I said I wouldn't.
Wonder what Robinson would say if there was a Muslim in court on grooming charges trying to get out of it on a technicality?
Well that can't be true as we have all been told it was only Robinson who would expose them and if he hadn't done it nobody would have known about it.
answer me this simple question. irrelevant of who the person is. do you believe it’s right in 2018 that man is sent down for a crime he didn’t commit?
The Attorney GeneralI thought it was being referred to the Supreme Court?
Does anyone actually believe he didn't commit the crime, he even pled guilty himself!answer me this simple question. irrelevant of who the person is. do you believe it’s right in 2018 that man is sent down for a crime he didn’t commit?
FFS...........Hardly the crime of the century. And Tommy is receiving donations from all around the world for his fight against the peodo muslims that are targeting our kids........Hang your head in shame if you disagree with that.Does anyone actually believe he didn't commit the crime, he even pled guilty himself!
I want the guilty punished and the not guilty to go free. What I don't want is the guilty who have access to money or legal assistance to be get off via a technicality. Sure Robinson wouldn't find that acceptable from those he protests against, why should it be different for him?
It isn't religion agreed it's a specific issue with Pakistanis and is cultural rather than religiousHe is yes, i take it with a pinch of salt mind you.
religion isnt the issue here, its the community that needs to be looked at. Lots of muslims will be doing what sikh and christian and atheists etc are all doing in whatsapp groups up and down the country, and by that i mean swearing at the rapists and wanting change from police and social services etc
Isn't it for his house?FFS...........Hardly the crime of the century. And Tommy is receiving donations from all around the world for his fight against the peodo muslims that are targeting our kids........Hang your head in shame if you disagree with that.
FFS...........Hardly the crime of the century. And Tommy is receiving donations from all around the world for his fight against the peodo muslims that are targeting our kids........Hang your head in shame if you disagree with that.
What did you think about Tommy defending convicted paedophile Richard Price?
Are you OK with white British Paedophiles?
There’s been others since and more serious than this individual also.
The issue for me is, Robinson aside, many times I have raised the problem of grooming gangs from this background and religion which I've found extremely hard to get across. It's constantly met with denial or deflection.
If people would accept there was a problem rather than arguing or conveniently deflecting to Robinson, we could fight the problem rather than making up excuses or pointing at Jimmy Saville.
All Peados are bad, but these guys are staggeringly high in the stats. Who's actually talking about these guys? Absolutely no one that dislikes Robinson because it's easier to just talk about him.
He shouldn't have a place to be so supported but the fact there has been so many cover ups shows that there is an issue with exposure and prosecution. He might have been a bit silly with how he does things, but how people can moan about him being wrong then in the same move deny there is an issue is beyond me.
The issue for me is, Robinson aside, many times I have raised the problem of grooming gangs from this background and religion which I've found extremely hard to get across. It's constantly met with denial or deflection.
If people would accept there was a problem rather than arguing or conveniently deflecting to Robinson, we could fight the problem rather than making up excuses or pointing at Jimmy Saville.
All Peados are bad, but these guys are staggeringly high in the stats. Who's actually talking about these guys? Absolutely no one that dislikes Robinson because it's easier to just talk about him.
He shouldn't have a place to be so supported but the fact there has been so many cover ups shows that there is an issue with exposure and prosecution. He might have been a bit silly with how he does things, but how people can moan about him being wrong then in the same move deny there is an issue is beyond me.
I think he's full of shit but don't deny the issue.The issue for me is, Robinson aside, many times I have raised the problem of grooming gangs from this background and religion which I've found extremely hard to get across. It's constantly met with denial or deflection.
If people would accept there was a problem rather than arguing or conveniently deflecting to Robinson, we could fight the problem rather than making up excuses or pointing at Jimmy Saville.
All Peados are bad, but these guys are staggeringly high in the stats. Who's actually talking about these guys? Absolutely no one that dislikes Robinson because it's easier to just talk about him.
He shouldn't have a place to be so supported but the fact there has been so many cover ups shows that there is an issue with exposure and prosecution. He might have been a bit silly with how he does things, but how people can moan about him being wrong then in the same move deny there is an issue is beyond me.
I can't recall ever seeing a post on this forum suggesting that paedophiles shouldn't be dealt with to the maximum extent the law allows. In fact most posts say the punishment should be far more severe than the law currently allows. The only person I can think of who has put the potential conviction of paedophiles at risk is Robinson himself.FFS...........Hardly the crime of the century. And Tommy is receiving donations from all around the world for his fight against the peodo muslims that are targeting our kids........Hang your head in shame if you disagree with that.
If you don't like Stephen you love paedophilia in all its forms, that's a fact.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?