Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Age discrimination though
Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (12 Viewers)
- Thread starter tisza
- Start date
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
But they have a lower age limit of 35. So if that age discrimination is ok why not old age? An 80 year old is far more likely to be incapable due to age than a 25 or 30 year old.
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
Well, according to the constitution he can't as you're only allowed two terms. But I fully expect him to try and overturn that if he wins along with numerous other checks on presidential power. What's more scary is that I think it may just happen as he cleanses the govt of any dissenters.
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
Yeah, but how are they going to feel about a person who was second choice to an increasingly senile old man? And Harris is far from popular, and that's without even mentioning those that may have issues with colour or sex. You'd think she might get more black and women votes, but I'm really not convinced (assuming she's the candidate).
I know there's a long way to go, but we all know that Trump can, and has, done pretty much whatever he likes and there are frightening number of people than will support him. They'll play big on the assassination attempt and it will get traction.
I can still only see a Trump win.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
why would that matter? if he loses as the post says he has only served 1 term
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
Harris's poll numbers are better than you'd think
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
Indeed it does. My bad.
Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
You and the left are so on the ropes it would almost be funny if it wasn't such a serious subject.
Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
Pathetic cuckold.
Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
Sorry, logic and reason don't apply on the off topic chat. You must be racist.
@Deleted member 5849 will be along in a minute to tell you that you are a bigot and racist. Pathetic cuck.
Como
Well-Known Member
As I have mentioned even the Dems do not like KK, she has a troubling history there is a reason they put a gag on her.
I do not think that even with its problems the US is going to vote for a DEI candidate.
Very interesting that the Dems do not have a democratic process for nominating their candidate.
I do not think that even with its problems the US is going to vote for a DEI candidate.
Very interesting that the Dems do not have a democratic process for nominating their candidate.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
That’s interesting
Diogenes
Well-Known Member
Don't you think it's a bit odd that such a monumental decision was announced to the world via a post on X without Biden announcing it via a press conference or an address to the nation? At first I just assumed it's because his batteries are low and they needed time to get him ready.
The more I look at this though I think there is skullduggery afoot. That latest signature is just too different from previous ones. I saw a lot of memes yesterday saying that Biden will have a shock when he wakes up and finds out that he has withdrawn from the race but I actually think theres something to this.
The more I look at this though I think there is skullduggery afoot. That latest signature is just too different from previous ones. I saw a lot of memes yesterday saying that Biden will have a shock when he wakes up and finds out that he has withdrawn from the race but I actually think theres something to this.
I suppose he is currently recovering/isolating due to covid
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Hasn't he got covid? Who knows how ill he is with that.
Also his statement said 'I will speak to the nation later this week in more detail about my decision'
The argument will be at what cost ? Shmmeee is right that Biden has implemented an ambitious industrial strategy and there is no doubt that it created jobs and boosted gdp over the last couple of years. My question would be the physical cost and the inflationary impact of it which some argue has been a bit stickier than elsewhere due to cash pumped into the economy (also some of this inflation was then exported around the world)
Is it better than Trumps big tax breaks for the rich, yes, will it prove to be good use of cash and benefit the country longer term, only time will tell.
Both parties seem to want to borrow, print and spend like monies no object (FP - no need to comment !). US bond yields (borrowing cost/interest) are substantially more than even ours and there is no doubt they will have to start printing again to service interest and government expenditure. What this does for currency debasement/inflation in future remains to be seen
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Has the resident chatbot fired up again?
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
But in 2020 China didn’t exist BSB! This is on Biden!!!
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Yeah but you’re a one note economist who only sees debt as important.
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
Oh dear.
It’s only important if you struggle to service it. I’ve said numerous times if debts used wisely on infrastructure etc and things that benefit a country long term, no problem.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
im just playing with you.
The inflationary aspects of the covid cash (that both Trump and Biden spent BTW) is a fair argument, but then you look at employment, wage growth, manufacturing supply chains. America is in by far the best post covid economic position on the planet. There’s not a country around I’d swap the last four years for, including China.
Mucca Mad Boys
Well-Known Member
There’s been a Parkinson’s specialist coming to the White House and the press office admitted to seeing Biden.
The Democrats have been knowingly keeping the extent of Joe Biden’s ill health away from the public. Is it a stretch to think he may have been diagnosed with Parkinson’s?
He did say a serious illness would prompt him to withdraw and COVID wouldn’t fall into that category despite his age - he will have the best healthcare money can buy.
Their growth has been amazing and there’s been a real positive impact on productivity as well. I always caveat what I say as none of us can see into the future and things might all be fine with regards debt/debt servicing. Im just a worrier at heart
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I can't really understand this line of argument-would it be better if unemployment in a country goes up and GDP goes down?
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
ranting on about "cuckholds" these days like a massive smackhead
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
The banter around these parts ain't what it used to be. People used to put some work into it rather than just quoting from righty incel types they've met on the dark web.
SBAndy
Well-Known Member
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
A 3rd rate Lozza Fox.
No, It’s great that GDP has been higher in the short term and that unemployment has remained low. It’s just the potential ‘cost’ of this
My point has always been that if you have to print more to achieve this, it debases the currency and can cause inflation. Ultimately this costs everyone and usually the poorest the most (inflation and/or debasing a currency is probably the least progressive form of ‘taxation’)
As I was saying to shmmeee, you can’t knock US recent economic performance, it’s been head and shoulders the strongest around. However, gdp is now slowing a bit and unemployment is creeping up, so has the last three years been a short term shot in the arm or a more longer term structural improvement. Only time will tell
ps still better than trump who probably would’ve borrowed/printed more to cut taxes for the richest.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
He also can't read, he did that "laughing" thing he does when he is too thick to understand the post to a comment saying that if Trumpdid lose he could legally run again in 2028 if alive.