KersleyDigs
Well-Known Member
If the Bigi transfer is confirmed today, you can bet your bottom dollar that it will be "Undisclosed".
I feel strongly about this and I don't agree with it at all. It was brought into the game so when a club received a fee for a player, other clubs in the transfer market wouldn't hold the buying club to ransom, as they then knew how much money they had.
This is completely irrelevant with City currently as we won't re-invest any fees we get. You would therefore expect that under SISU's new policy of transparency that they will tell us exactly the deal they have done to let our most talented youngster in years go, to justify so AND show us that they are acting in the clubs best interests.
Of course this will not happen as they are (historically) terrible negotiators and will not want to tell us that they've let Gael go for 500k raising to 1m (in the next 5 years) probably with a tiny sell on clause 5-10%.
I'm assuming that the Fleck deal involves a 40% sell on clause for Rangers or something stupid too!
I feel strongly about this and I don't agree with it at all. It was brought into the game so when a club received a fee for a player, other clubs in the transfer market wouldn't hold the buying club to ransom, as they then knew how much money they had.
This is completely irrelevant with City currently as we won't re-invest any fees we get. You would therefore expect that under SISU's new policy of transparency that they will tell us exactly the deal they have done to let our most talented youngster in years go, to justify so AND show us that they are acting in the clubs best interests.
Of course this will not happen as they are (historically) terrible negotiators and will not want to tell us that they've let Gael go for 500k raising to 1m (in the next 5 years) probably with a tiny sell on clause 5-10%.
I'm assuming that the Fleck deal involves a 40% sell on clause for Rangers or something stupid too!