Upping the post count (2 Viewers)

[chiefdave]

......... Along with 4 judges and the majority of Coventry fans and rate payers.

If you're going to use that logic you'd have to also say SISU have done no wrong!

 

---

[Nick]

......... Along with 4 judges and the majority of Coventry fans and rate payers.

Didn't the judges only rule if it was state aid or not? Not if they have done things to damage CCFC?

 

[dongonzalos]

If you're going to use that logic you'd have to also say SISU have done no wrong!

SISU haven't been accused of anything have they
Well not Infront of the judges
Well apart from devaluing ACL to buy it on the cheap by the judges. That isn't illegal though I don't think?

 

[chiefdave]

SISU haven't been accused of anything have they
Well not Infront of the judges
Well apart from devaluing ACL to buy it on the cheap by the judges. That isn't illegal though I don't think?

Exactly, so if italia is asserting that 'CCC have done nothing wrong' asserting on the basis they haven't been found guilty of any illegal activity then you can also say the same of SISU as they haven't been found guilty of any illegal activity either.

 

[italiahorse]

Didn't the judges only rule if it was state aid or not? Not if they have done things to damage CCFC?

The damage was already done and CCC just protected themselves.
It's in the detail no matter how bitter a pill it is too swallow.

 

[ccfcway]

Didn't the judges only rule if it was state aid or not? Not if they have done things to damage CCFC?

agree 100% with this. All the judges did was rule on state aid, its the citizens of Coventry that have supported Labour by continuing to vote them in.

 

[Grendel]

The damage was already done and CCC just protected themselves.
It's in the detail no matter how bitter a pill it is too swallow.

Do you actually type this drivel or does nick Eastwood do it himself?

 

[italiahorse]

Exactly, so if italia is asserting that 'CCC have done nothing wrong' asserting on the basis they haven't been found guilty of any illegal activity then you can also say the same of SISU as they haven't been found guilty of any illegal activity either.

Correct.
However they will be judged by most CCFC fans as using the club just to make a profit for themselves.
Again thats okay if CCFC is left in a better position when they move on.

How's that going ?

 

[chiefdave]

However they will be judged by most CCFC fans as using the club just to make a profit for themselves.

How much profit have they made from the club?

 

[italiahorse]

Do you actually type this drivel or does nick Eastwood do it himself?

Hows the humble pie going ?

 

[Grendel]

How much profit have they made from the club?

Lol no doubt it's in the detail

 

[italiahorse]

How much profit have they made from the club?

None. Their plan went wrong.

 

[Grendel]

Hows the humble pie going ?

Sorry humble pie for what?

 

[ccfcway]

None. Their plan went wrong.

so they are being judged by not taking any profit from the club ?

 

[chiefdave]

None.

So you're saying most fans judge SISU on the basis of something that never actually happened!

 

[skybluetony176]

Do you think SISU should stop the legal BS now? Enough is enough wouldn't you agree? There is no legal case is there?

Lol no doubt it's in the detail

As your back any chance of answering my questions?

 

[italiahorse]

Sorry humble pie for what?

Haven't you started eating it yet?
Mind you it must be one the biggest ever made !!

 

[italiahorse]

so they are being judged by not taking any profit from the club ?

No, making profit by using the club.

 

[Grendel]

Haven't you started eating it yet?
Mind you it must be one the biggest ever made !!

For what?

 

[ccfcway]

No, making profit by using the club.

what are they making profit on ?

It cant be the club
it cant be the court cases

 

[Nick]

So you're saying most fans judge SISU on the basis of something that never actually happened!

In fairness, it sounds about right.

 

[Grendel]

No, making profit by using the club.

That's a strong accusation. Do you have any evidence?

 

[italiahorse]

That's a strong accusation. Do you have any evidence?

Their a hedge fund, that's what successful ones do.

 

[armybike]

Didn't the judges only rule if it was state aid or not? Not if they have done things to damage CCFC?

Yep, justice has been served.

#morals

 

[Grendel]

Their a hedge fund, that's what successful ones do.

Do you have any evidence?

 

[Grendel]

Yep, justice has been served.

#morals

Morals? Sisu have not break any laws so does that make them moral?

Good to see you back by the way. Now the seasons over I guess you feel on safe ground. Less football talk eh?

 

[skybluetony176]

Do you think SISU should stop the legal BS now? Enough is enough wouldn't you agree? There is no legal case is there?

Morals? Sisu have not break any laws so does that make them moral?

Good to see you back by the way. Now the seasons over I guess you feel on safe ground. Less football talk eh?

Any chance you could answer my questions? You're not dodging them are you?

 

[Grendel]

Any chance you could answer my questions? You're not dodging them are you?

Given your refusal to ever answer any questions without asking one that's pretty funny and don't flatter yourself Tony - your not even at Simon Gilbert levels in terms of questions.

 

[armybike]

Any chance you could answer my questions? You're not dodging them are you?

When you're correct 100% of the time you don't need to answer questions. You just present them and ignore the replies.

 

[italiahorse]

Do you have any evidence?

The only hedge fund I know never managed to do it so no I don't have any evidence it works .

 

[Grendel]

When you're correct 100% of the time you don't need to answer questions. You just present them and ignore the replies.

Really regarding this actual thread you should think of a Carly Simon number and yes it is.

 

[skybluetony176]

Given your refusal to ever answer any questions without asking one that's pretty funny and don't flatter yourself Tony - your not even at Simon Gilbert levels in terms of questions.

That's a no then. You just can't bring yourself to admit that there never was a case to answer to can you? Or admit that enough is enough and it's time to stop this BS and concentrate their efforts somewhere more productive, like CCFC?

Clearly bashing CCC is more important to you than CCFC. Pretty sad really. You're getting very lonely on that score, there's almost complete agreement on this site with regards carrying on with litigation. Maybe you just like to be different.

 

[Grendel]

That's a no then. You just can't bring yourself to admit that there never was a case to answer to can you? Or admit that enough is enough and it's time to stop this BS and concentrate their efforts somewhere more productive, like CCFC?

Clearly bashing CCC is more important to you than CCFC. Pretty sad really. You're getting very lonely on that score, there's almost complete agreement on this site with regards carrying on with litigation. Maybe you just like to be different.

Have a nice day today Tony?

 

[dongonzalos]

Exactly, so if italia is asserting that 'CCC have done nothing wrong' asserting on the basis they haven't been found guilty of any illegal activity then you can also say the same of SISU as they haven't been found guilty of any illegal activity either.

I don't think they have done anything illegal.
To be honest I never thought CCFC did either.
Getting 2 sets of legal advice including external advice saying they were in safe legal grounds.
Then a never seen before legal action happens.
If they had lost that I still wouldn't view them as having done anything wrong as they were following legal advice.

 

[skybluetony176]

Have a nice day today Tony?

What a sap. You just can't bring yourself to admit it can you?