Evo1883
Well-Known Member
You just went straight over it without comment , I don't necessarily think you support it but sometimes as stated its better to show empathy
You just went straight over it without comment , I don't necessarily think you support it but sometimes as stated its better to show empathyWhy do people think I support the video?
Why do people think I support the video?
You just went straight over it without comment , I don't necessarily think you support it but sometimes as stated its better to show empathy
I said I agreed with Boosh's initial comments.By your comment towards it which did not outright condemn.
well vlad and grenners are both angry and shortI wasn't referring to that one, have a look at the header on his profile
But yeah young Stalin was a right handsome bastard!
I said I agreed with Boosh's initial comments.
It’s kind of an irrelevant argument though. The fact is Putin wholesale has invaded another country. Another country that is a democracy and willing to fight for it. That’s just a fact.
well vlad and grenners are both angry and short
By your comment towards it which did not outright condemn.
Ukraine has banned a load of opposition parties hasn't it, including the largest opposition party?
Absolutely nobody on here aligns with their politics yet blindly follow them .. Ukraine is almost as fucking abhorrent as Russia politicallyIndeed it has
I’m old enough to remember when you were slating Corbyns stance on Russia for not making out that they were the Bogeyman.Of course its nonsense. Russia is the US big bad boogeyman and the rest of us - well mostly us actually - just fall in line, salute the star spangled banner and obey.
I’m old enough to remember when you were slating Corbyns stance on Russia for not making out that they weren’t the Bogeyman.
There is a difference between opposing the invasion and subsequent destruction, and thinking it's some kind of Utopia.Absolutely nobody on here aligns with their politics yet blindly follow them .. Ukraine is almost as fucking abhorrent as Russia politically
There is a difference between opposing the invasion and subsequent destruction, and thinking it's some kind of Utopia.
I'm sure should say china invade russia tomorrow there would be widespread condemnation globally
If China invaded Tawain we would say nothing and do fuck all but roll out the red carpet for China at the Coronation
I do consider it of strategic importance and not just from a military point of view. Ethically, I'm never going to support unprovoked invasions of other countries.Why are you opposing the invasion unless you consider it strategically? Ethically no one cares surely?
I do consider it of strategic importance and not just from a military point of view. Ethically, I'm never going to support unprovoked invasions of other countries.
You are also talking to someone who thinks Blair should be in the dock for Iraq
My first general election was 2010Did you not vote for Labour under Mr Blair the after the invason?
I do consider it of strategic importance and not just from a military point of view. Ethically, I'm never going to support unprovoked invasions of other countries.
You are also talking to someone who thinks Blair should be in the dock for Iraq
11 more opposition parties than Putin ever had. Weren’t they banned for being pro the invaders? Understandable under the circumstances you would think. How many have mysteriously fell out of windows? Or accidentally drank radioactive tea? How many opposition leaders are in jail? It’s a bit of a false equivalency really when you start looking at the details.Ukraine has banned a load of opposition parties hasn't it, including the largest opposition party?
11 more opposition parties than Putin ever had. Weren’t they banned for being pro the invaders? Understandable under the circumstances you would think. How many have mysteriously fell out of windows? Or accidentally drank radioactive tea? How many opposition leaders are in jail? It’s a bit of a false equivalency really when you start looking at the details.
It's banned a load of parties with Russian-links since the invasion.Ukraine has banned a load of opposition parties hasn't it, including the largest opposition party?
It's banned a load of parties with Russian-links since the invasion.
And that’s proven to be a mistake. We’ve tried to appease Putin for years and it’s never worked. Why you think it will work now is beyond me.Oddly we never seemed that concerned
It's banned a load of parties with Russian-links since the invasion.
I honestly don’t know but the fact is there is opposition parties, they do have free and democratic elections. There is no comparison to the democratic process in Russia simply because there isn’t one in Russia. You’re trying to bestow an equivalence on Ukraine with Russia where there is non.It's banned a load of parties with Russian-links since the invasion.
During WW2 would we have accepted political parties with official links to the Nazis or funding from them? When you have Ukrainian parliamentary committees sitting on issues related to the war would it be sensible to have pro-Russian MPs sitting on them? These are wartime decisions.but why? is that democratic? Presumably there are people who live in Ukraine that support these parties? Is that not allowed in a democracy?
but why? is that democratic? Presumably there are people who live in Ukraine that support these parties? Is that not allowed in a democracy?
Also how do you define a political party. A quick look at the list and some of them amount to little more than pound shop National Actions. A self proclaimed political party banned in the UK.but why? is that democratic? Presumably there are people who live in Ukraine that support these parties? Is that not allowed in a democracy?
in the nearly 20 years i've had dealings there by far the most financially corrupt govt of the lot.Isnt it referencing the exile of yanukovych?
During WW2 would we have accepted political parties with official links to the Nazis or funding from them? When you have Ukrainian parliamentary committees sitting on issues related to the war would it be sensible to have pro-Russian MPs sitting on them? These are wartime decisions.
If the Electoral Commission were to discover a party (for argument’s sake, UKIP) were directly financially backed by a foreign state would you wilfully sit by hoping they didn’t get into power or would you expect the EC to take action?
Parties were banned by the National security council for pro-russian views even after the invasion - most were small with no MPs. Largest one splintered with the majority of the MPs forming a pro-EU accession party and against the Russian invasion.Are all of those 11 opposition parties (including the largest one) all backed by the Russian federation? Like I keep asking. What is the objective test being applied?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?