Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
That’s objectively not what isolationism means....because they're protecting what they perceive to be their self-interests.
That’s objectively not what isolationism means....because they're protecting what they perceive to be their self-interests.
It's the principle of only being interested in your own country and acting in its own self-interests. It does not mean withdrawing from the world completely.That’s objectively not what isolationism means.
Yes, exactly, it's what I said.
…they’re involving themselves in Israel and Yemen as we speak. They are also mostly seeking peace as a way to steal Ukraine’s mineral wealth. It doesn’t end their involvement in that country either.Yes, exactly, it's what I said.
Here's the dictionary definition as well - isolationism
the political principle or practice of showing interest only in your own country and not being involved in international activities
...yes, because in all those cases, they perceive them as serving their self-interests (showing interest in their own country).…they’re involving themselves in Israel and Yemen as we speak. They are also mostly seeking peace as a way to steal Ukraine’s mineral wealth. It doesn’t end their involvement in that country either.
Perhaps long term they can make more money mining minerals than being a protection racket? There's gold in them thar hills.It went from 'the US wants a forever war to fund their defence sector' to 'the US is withdrawing support to save billions of dollars' real quick.
Has anyone on here said that apart from you?'the US is withdrawing support to save billions of dollars'
Has anyone on here said that apart from you?
The USA has achieved its mission to isolate Russia from EuropeIt went from 'the US wants a forever war to fund their defence sector' to 'the US is withdrawing support to save billions of dollars' real quick.
To what end?The USA has achieved its mission to isolate Russia from Europe
To the end of creating bigger markets in which to sell American goods and services.To what end?
Sorry - which markets specifically?To the end of creating bigger markets in which to sell American goods and services.
And this:
Extracts from the interview/ Neville Chamberlain Speech/ Texas should be Mexican based on Witkoff.Republicn logic.
The USA has achieved its mission to isolate Russia from Europe
Putin could do that immediately.The best outcome above all else is an end to fighting at this point and the deaths of more people.
Putin could do that immediately.
Post Cold War there was a massive improvement in relations with Russia. The reason that ended was Putin.Putin did a pretty good job of that himself.
...yes, because in all those cases, they perceive them as serving their self-interests (showing interest in their own country).
Post Cold War there was a massive improvement in relations with Russia. The reason that ended was Putin.
Putin could do that immediately.
You think Zelensky ceasing hostilities would stop the deaths of any more people?Well that is no more happening than Zelensky unilaterally laying down arms and ceasing hostilities
You think Zelensky ceasing hostilities would stop the deaths of any more people?
Just as well!I don't think I actually said that
Well that is no more happening than Zelensky unilaterally laying down arms and ceasing hostilities
'ceasing hostilities'
Classic. Tankies gonna tankie.
Merely stating a fact. Putin is the only man prolonging this conflict and it’s entirely up to him to decide when it stops.Well that is no more happening than Zelensky unilaterally laying down arms and ceasing hostilities
Merely stating a fact. Putin is the only man prolonging this conflict and it’s entirely up to him to decide when it stops.
I’m old enough to remember 45 minutes ago when you denied saying that a Ukraine surrender would stop any more deathsNot really - If Ukraine totally surrendered the conflict surely would stop?