We need a “who are wasps blaming” thread to keep track of who’s at fault hereHaving numerous arguments on Twitter today
They STILL keep saying 'But sisu' 'But 10k attendances' 'but ccfc fans' Even when faced with pics of attendances
Fucking idiots
I like the “can’t wait for cov to get relegated. Enjoy league one” tweets.On that subject, they run away when you show them evidence of their attendance lies
Might be my finest twitter moment tbf enjoy the read
View attachment 26563View attachment 26564View attachment 26565View attachment 26566
Yes it was pretty bizarre. Given the prevailing rates at the time, 6.5% seemed way over what they needed to offer, and was in itself a warning sign as you say.Stuart Barnes has an article in The Times today saying that the return of 6.5% on the bond was so out of sync with with the state of the economy at the time, with interest rates at .5% that it should have been seen as the warning it was
It's one of the oldest sayings in the financial world but when something looks too good to be true, it usually is
Shooting fish in a barrel !!!!On that subject, they run away when you show them evidence of their attendance lies
Might be my finest twitter moment tbf enjoy the read
View attachment 26563View attachment 26564View attachment 26565View attachment 26566
Aren't they either owner operated or franchised?
On that subject, they run away when you show them evidence of their attendance lies
Might be my finest twitter moment tbf enjoy the read
View attachment 26563View attachment 26564View attachment 26565View attachment 26566
So I now know of at least two on here…Sorry, couldn't help myself, it's that kit........
On that subject, they run away when you show them evidence of their attendance lies
Might be my finest twitter moment tbf enjoy the read
View attachment 26563View attachment 26564View attachment 26565View attachment 26566
On that subject, they run away when you show them evidence of their attendance lies
Might be my finest twitter moment tbf enjoy the read
View attachment 26563View attachment 26564View attachment 26565View attachment 26566
I’ve tried hunting back for pics of our home attendances in L2 but can’t find any. Be interesting to see the comparison.
I’ve tried hunting back for pics of our home attendances in L2 but can’t find any. Be interesting to see the comparison.
Well things change don’t they but even if the decision was genuinely made for the right reasons they have to admit that it wasn’t the right one now surelySurely “nothing to see here” Maton, “fag ash” Lucas, and “over my dead body” Duggins must all come under scrutiny and public enquiry over their parts in this shitshow now?
It may be a very slightly misleading picture but below is a snapshot of our attendance vs Sheff Utd (the protest one). Attendance 8,801.
View attachment 26567
Edit: and this was in the 86th minute so probably a fair few that had already left.
Can definitely tell the advertising has stopped… the negative news rolls in and the telegraph have cosied more up to the city,As we allways guessed wasps paying reach for positive media and threatening to pull advertising
no pics but we averaged 9255 (Again recorded attendance rather than actual) however I think we only had around 3k STH so probably 8500+ in attendanceI’ve tried hunting back for pics of our home attendances in L2 but can’t find any. Be interesting to see the comparison.
As we allways guessed wasps paying reach for positive media and threatening to pull advertising
Maybe we see some leaks from councilors who weren't happy with the deal to sell to Wasp but were silenced at the timeNot just Wasps pressuring the CET to pull negative stories.
The council also squashed things like the arena bailout story by threatening to withdraw advertising. I'd be very surprised if they didn't have a hand in suppressing anything negative about their pet Wasps project too.
I’ve tried hunting back for pics of our home attendances in L2 but can’t find any. Be interesting to see the comparison.
Remember all the talk of tinfoil hats when people were pointing out this was going on at the time...As we allways guessed wasps paying reach for positive media and threatening to pull advertising
The council's lease to Wasps at the time included a stipulation that insolvency of any kind could see the club forced to forfeit ownership of the stadium, with the exact wording: "If the tenant enters into some kind of insolvency regime."
I hope someone is advising joy not to play hardball and expect a long lease for nothing from ccc. Real opportunity here to do some real good either owning or selling and uniting the ground with ccfc in a deal that can be sustaining or hopefully so
But don’t the council have to agree and assign it?Personal opinion, Pete, but everything I've read suggests the bondholders (who have a first charge on it) get the lease or at least the administrator gets to sell it to pay them. So I don't think CCC will get much of a say in it this time. This could be a good thing!
Broad Street?Nah, let them find out what a proper rugby ground is like
But don’t the council have to agree and assign it?
Personal opinion, Pete, but everything I've read suggests the bondholders (who have a first charge on it) get the lease or at least the administrator gets to sell it to pay them. So I don't think CCC will get much of a say in it this time. This could be a good thing!
their interest will be purely financial (certainly if they are in it for any material amounts)Isn't that worse for us? I wonder what the socio-economic mix is of the bondholders but I'd suggest a number would be Wasps fans. I can't imagine they'd be enamoured about CCFC having any sort of benefit out of this.
I could be totally wrong though!
Won't they just get the best offer to the administrator rather than a choice?Isn't that worse for us? I wonder what the socio-economic mix is of the bondholders but I'd suggest a number would be Wasps fans. I can't imagine they'd be enamoured about CCFC having any sort of benefit out of this.
I could be totally wrong though!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?