TomRad85
Well-Known Member
You have to ask how big of a c**t would someone have to be to go and watch Wasps. Surely the most embarrassing sports club on the planet.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Wasps new stadium plan (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter fernandopartridge
- Start date
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
Awaiting Shugs: “it’s all a conspiracy, Chris Holland only wants what’s best for Wasps and Worcester. Looking forward to sharing six ways with Worcester and the community”
shepardo01
Well-Known Member
Sounds slightly familiar... anybody been on the Worcester site and told them how W**ps behaved here and in Henley in Arden?...
shepardo01
Well-Known Member
Am I right in thinking Holland is Richardsons mate who he transferred the training ground to ??
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
Grendel
Well-Known Member
To be fair they hated each other so much in the the end they literally wouldn’t be in the same room together
Worcester Warriors: Supporters' group urges RFU to block Wasps' bid to move to Sixways
Worcester Warriors: Supporters' group urges RFU to block Wasps' bid to move to Sixways
A Worcester fans' group has urged the Rugby Football Union to reject Wasps' bid to play at Sixways.
www.bbc.co.uk
duffer
Well-Known Member
The RFU are much like the EFL. Incompetent bottlers, basically.
It's an absolute stitch up of a(nother) club by Wasps owners.
If Holland doesn't fund it (by in effect securing his loan against the ground) then the Atlas deal for Warriors falls through and Worcester at least get a slim second chance at finding someone who can keep them going.
It's as bent as a nine bob note, which is why the RFU will almost certainly wave it through.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Lol couldn’t make it up
www.irishnews.com
Lawrence Dallaglio given time to clear tax debt of around £700,000
Judge Sebastian Prentis considered the former England rugby star's case at an Insolvency and Companies Court hearing in London.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
He's asking in his latest podcast whether the players should have greater say in the running of the game.Lol couldn’t make it up
Lawrence Dallaglio given time to clear tax debt of around £700,000
Judge Sebastian Prentis considered the former England rugby star's case at an Insolvency and Companies Court hearing in London.
Sums the scum up nicely. You’ve got to feel sorry for any community that they turn up in.
Frostie
Well-Known Member
Literally parasites.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
It seems from an article today Richardson is arguing his loans should be classed as a rugby creditor - he has lodged legal action against a former directors solicitor firm
The wasps new consortium are arguing image rights fees (basically a dodge to get out of the salary cap) are not valid for payment
in other news Shugs is unhappy at Worcester and Coventry fans ruining the forums with distortions of the and should look at their own failed businesses rather than one that’s getting ready to thrive and offer people great rugby. Worcester fans should get on board the wasps train as the only way of saving rugby in Worcester
The wasps new consortium are arguing image rights fees (basically a dodge to get out of the salary cap) are not valid for payment
in other news Shugs is unhappy at Worcester and Coventry fans ruining the forums with distortions of the and should look at their own failed businesses rather than one that’s getting ready to thrive and offer people great rugby. Worcester fans should get on board the wasps train as the only way of saving rugby in Worcester
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Tbf wouldn't you?
Doesn't mean he will, but if he ends up stalling the resurrected Wasps enough that they can't take their place in the league, maybe he wasn't so bad after all
MalcSB
Well-Known Member
Richardson’s legal action is against his advisers, not Wasps so won’t affect them. That argument will be separate from the rugby creditors one.Tbf wouldn't you?
Doesn't mean he will, but if he ends up stalling the resurrected Wasps enough that they can't take their place in the league, maybe he wasn't so bad after all
To be classed as a rugby creditor, a creditor has to be entirely or predominantly reliant on rugby income. Players and equipment supplier can easily show that, I doubt Richardson could.
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
was
fucking hell - Shugs is trotting out the same shit he was saying 9 years ago. Surely there’s got to be a point where you think - “we’re the common denominator”
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
This Richardson bloke seems to like court he always seems to be arguing with somebody.
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
Did the bond holders get much of their investment back in the end?
jordan210
Well-Known Member
Like everything with wasps no one has a clue. it appears very messy as some have been told they are getting paid others not. No one knows how much they are going to get.
Basicly like everything wasps touches it goes to shit
Roughly 39% as an interim
Possible extra 5%
Getting little of the PRU shares money
MusicDating
Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
Times article -
Grendel
Well-Known Member
One thing I do know from a source that’s 99% reliable is Richardson and Holland were at loggerheads for months before the demise and in the end was so bad they couldn’t be seen in the same room together
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Always knew you were best mates with Nick Eastwood
Grendel
Well-Known Member
As one poster said never trust a man who wears Farrah trousers and plastic slip on shoes
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
tbf don't think anybody does trust you around these parts?
The image rights fees, assume that’s money still owed to ex-players?
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
I don't feel sorry for Richardson as such but I have a degree of empathy in that he was the one who actually put some money in. He'll see it as he's made a loss and Holland has picked up a training ground and the club's branding.
Nick
Administrator
Who paid for the training ground in the first place though?
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
But with investments you're told the value can go down as well as up and your capital is at risk. That's why the returns are higher.
If you provide a service to someone as part of a contract then it's a fair expectation to be paid for those services. I'd certainly say they've got a much stronger claim to be recompensed.
And I don't agree with rugby/football creditor rules - I think if you've provided the service you should have the same right as any other provider. But I think they should all take precedence over a capital investor.