Who knows...maybe If SISU thought Ashley was directly interested, they would have wanted more for the club ?Still don't get why Ashley would use a middle man for this but he is the billionaire to be fair.
I know we at Cov don’t have a lot of love for the whole Wasps package but they were always going to re-emerge somewhere, in the Rugby Union world they are about as big you get, certain it won’t be here, if there was to be rugger played at the CBS why not invite Cov Rugby, reason, there’s no solid support for club rugby. I’d think ladies football has more chance of being played at CBS reckon a half decent ladies team could get around 3/4/5000 screaming girls looking to spend their dosh. Right up Fraser groups street.
I don’t think King is a middle man as such - I think Ashley wanted to drive SISU out, but king senses a way to Make money.Still don't get why Ashley would use a middle man for this but he is the billionaire to be fair.
I think people need to give it up…King bought the football club and that’s all there is to itI don’t think King is a middle man as such - I think Ashley wanted to drive SISU out, but king senses a way to Make money.
he knows Joy - gets the club at cut price/ acceptable to her, he has the capital to keep us ticking over. (Say he spends 15m) tidies the club up and presents it to Ashley for 30m
I know we at Cov don’t have a lot of love for the whole Wasps package but they were always going to re-emerge somewhere, in the Rugby Union world they are about as big you get, certain it won’t be here, if there was to be rugger played at the CBS why not invite Cov Rugby, reason, there’s no solid support for club rugby. I’d think ladies football has more chance of being played at CBS reckon a half decent ladies team could get around 3/4/5000 screaming girls looking to spend their dosh. Right up Fraser groups street.
Yup. Even if Ashley bought the club down the line, it'd prove nothing anyway.I think people need to give it up…King bought the football club and that’s all there is to it
Yup. Even if Ashley bought the club down the line, it'd prove nothing anyway.
I don’t doubt that - I think he senses an opportunity.I think people need to give it up…King bought the football club and that’s all there is to it
Not sure anyone's trying to prove anything, I was just relaying what I heard!
Going by my DMs I wasn't the only one, it could, of course be utter bollocks.
It's the middle man bit really... and I didn't even know you'd kicked it off this time!
3000-5000 for ladies football at the CBSA? I’ll have some of whatever you’re on
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well the lower estimate would be more than Wasps or Coventry RC would get.3000-5000 for ladies football at the CBSA? I’ll have some of whatever you’re on
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My godHe wasn't at Tuesdays game- not saying there is anything in that but not sure football is his passion and wouldn't be surprised if he was not here for the long term.
Thinking about it this does seem plausible.I wasn't going to put anything on here but fuck it, I heard on Saturday that that is in fact the case and we will be owned by Ashley within 12 months.
Source has a mixed track record but has got a few big calls right over the last few years.
I'm struggling to understand the RFUs stance on allowing one club to continue and not the other, they both failed whatever the circumstance surrounding each club. How can Wasps be allowed back into the second tier of rugby and as yet have nowhere to play?The statement saying “ “We remain in positive dialogue with the RFU and thank them for their continued support as we work to secure our future.
Our focus remains on stabilising the club financially and Wasps playing in the Championship next season.”
Doesn’t read as they have actually sorted anything yet. Bit open ended
The new Worcester owners have refused to repay “rugby creditors” which was a requirement to be allowed back in at Championship level. Nouveau Wasps have said they will repay rugby creditors and must have given some assurances about where they will play which meets RFU requirements. Bondholders left out of pocket.I'm struggling to understand the RFUs stance on allowing one club to continue and not the other, they both failed whatever the circumstance surrounding each club. How can Wasps be allowed back into the second tier of rugby and as yet have nowhere to play?
Has this nomadic rugby club got some kind of hold over the national governing body because it seems to me that they're being given every opportunity unlike Worcester.
So there's a clear distinction between rugby creditors and Bondholders then.The new Worcester owners have refused to repay “rugby creditors” which was a requirement to be allowed back in at Championship level. Nouveau Wasps have said they will repay rugby creditors and must have given some assurances about where they will play which meets RFU requirements. Bondholders left out of pocket.
So there's a clear distinction between rugby creditors and Bondholders then.
One lot get repaid, the other lot don't.
Whoever thinks that's right need to go and wobble their heads.......for a very very long time.
Then the rules must have been written and agreed by some very strange folk me thinks.Its not about thinking its right, its what the rules are.
Yeah, nothing about a middleman was mentioned to me just that Ashley would have the naming rights and the club within 12 months.
The Last Of Ass? They got porn parodies already?My god
Wasn’t at Tuesdays game so football isn’t his passion and he won’t be around long
Sounds reasonable. Or of course maybe he just fancied sitting at home and watching TLOA
They’re written by the RFU for their competition. It’s the same in football.Then the rules must have been written and agreed by some very strange folk me thinks.
Don't get me wrong, I simply want to see Wasps well and truly stamped into the mud and never recover.They’re written by the RFU for their competition. It’s the same in football.
the RFU only give a fuck about their members. They can let in whomever they want as long as their criteria is met.
i mean ultimately I don’t have that much sympathy with the bond holders - it’s a deal that was too good to be true. They tried to cash in on our misery
I’m with you - but the faux sympathy for bond holders isn’t needed.Don't get me wrong, I simply want to see Wasps well and truly stamped into the mud and never recover.
Is that awful of me to think that?
No HDW, it's not faux sympathy for bondholders from me, I was just questioning why creditors had to be repaid and why not bondholders. Thinking about it since its been explained a little more then I'm of the opinion I couldn't give a rats ass about the whole putrid shitshow that is/was Wasps.I’m with you - but the faux sympathy for bond holders isn’t needed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?