If there are so many is easy to find one?
I've also seen posts where he has said it. His hatred for the council runs deep which probably clouds his judgement !!
Said what, he prefers sisu over ccfc?
Anything but CCC. Or are you saying you have never noticed any?
Who cares who wins as long as City return to the Ricoh. I really couldn't give a flying F if it destroyed SISU, ACL or both in the aftermath. I have absolutely zero interest in any of the players involved in this mess.
Who cares who wins as long as City return to the Ricoh. I really couldn't give a flying F if it destroyed SISU, ACL or both in the aftermath. I have absolutely zero interest in any of the players involved in this mess.
Is that saying he prefers sisu to the club?
Most people don't give a shit about a hedge fund do they? I haven't seen anybody say I hope sisu make loads of money?
Is that saying he prefers sisu to the club?
He's stated he hopes ACL go bust.
But I don't recall him saying he preferred SISU over CCFC and, in fairness, no City fan would say that.
I have to admit I struggle with the whole Kylie/Dannii thing. Not on this though. I don't think there is anyone who prefers SISU to the club. Or ACL for that matter. The only people who say are those on here who use it as ammunition.
Who said that? Tries to make out that SISU is our club though. Like a few others do.
This is my point, but people do about the council. Unless they have some sort of agenda I don't think a proper fan would
They don't it is exactly the opposite of what you are saying.It is the same principles but you only see it one way.
Some people do not believe SISU have the best interests of the club at heart. Some people back the council in their dispute with SISU as they can differentiate their support for the club ran by SISU.
They are not choosing the council over CCFC.
It is strange that you can make that argument one way but not the other way round.
So if CCFC returned next season after "getting what thet want" do you think no one will go?
I agree with this other than would like to see Higgs get a large proportion of their money back whoever pays it.
Just about to do a school run. Will add my thoughts in a new thread soon.
So if CCFC returned next season after "getting what thet want" do you think no one will go?
Some people do not believe SISU have the best interests of the club at heart.
They probably haven't, but that doesn't mean that it would necessarily be bad for the club if they do get what they want. It looks to me that Sisu need to make the club sellable. What's the best way to do that? I would have thought more buyers would be interested in a club which owns its own ground/holds a very long lease, isn't haemorrhaging money and has other potential revenues. I don't see how it is in Sisu's interests to make the club unsellable. Hell, it might even mean we get some decent owners in for once, not the usual chancers and conmen we seem to attract.
That logic of that argument doesn't hold up under inspection, giving SISU what they want makes the club cost more, it also forces bidders to negotiate with them, which as we all know is unlikely to go smoothly.
I think there will be more interest if CCFC is sold as a distressed asset & the more debt SISU are forced to write off the better as far as I'm concerned.
I don't think a proper fan would
They probably haven't, but that doesn't mean that it would necessarily be bad for the club if they do get what they want. It looks to me that Sisu need to make the club sellable. What's the best way to do that? I would have thought more buyers would be interested in a club which owns its own ground/holds a very long lease, isn't haemorrhaging money and has other potential revenues. I don't see how it is in Sisu's interests to make the club unsellable. Hell, it might even mean we get some decent owners in for once, not the usual chancers and conmen we seem to attract.
They probably haven't, but that doesn't mean that it would necessarily be bad for the club if they do get what they want. It looks to me that Sisu need to make the club sellable. What's the best way to do that? I would have thought more buyers would be interested in a club which owns its own ground/holds a very long lease, isn't haemorrhaging money and has other potential revenues. I don't see how it is in Sisu's interests to make the club unsellable. Hell, it might even mean we get some decent owners in for once, not the usual chancers and conmen we seem to attract.
THE DECIDER OF FANSHIP HAS SPOKEN.
You're really taking to this new role of King of all fans aren't you?
Sorry, where does the logic not hold up? A counter-supposition does not in any way negate logic. Stop being a ponce.
THE DECIDER OF FANSHIP HAS SPOKEN.
You're really taking to this new role of King of all fans aren't you?
What role would that be? Where has anybody said anything like that or are you talking shit?
Can any of you boring twats tell us what SISU have done any good for the team on the pitch the last 4 years ?
I've said it here. You quoted it.
Your role deciding which fans are worthy. Like you decided who would be appropriate to meet Labovitch, now you've decided anyone who disagrees with your assessment of the council isn't a proper fan.
Must be a nice gig.
Can any of you boring twats tell us what SISU have done any good for the team on the pitch the last 4 years ?
They got rid of Eastwood. Other than that I am struggling.
Do you feel left out Shmmee? Seems you have a real issue with this and I fail to see why.I've said it here. You quoted it.
Your role deciding which fans are worthy. Like you decided who would be appropriate to meet Labovitch, now you've decided anyone who disagrees with your assessment of the council isn't a proper fan.
Must be a nice gig.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?