Grendel
Well-Known Member
Careful you will have to delete your own posts
Lazy pr companies?
The fact you don't understand directors responsibilities is understandable. You spend so much time on here spouting crap, that you don't develop your career to a level whereby you might be able pass on your own experiences from the boardroom
So at last you agree ACL "director responsibility" is merely MMM speak for doing what the council wants?
No. I'm saying you don't understand, and you can't educate pork. That's it, really
I get PM's from people who support my stance on here and don't post themseleves because of the inevitable abuse from idiots like you. I post becuase of them -- people who care about the club and actually have a balanced view. Looking at your posting history as with Ron's I see not one about the team.
Why is that?
Oh dear - you are getting desperate. Seen Peter recently?
This will help you. Just for starters. A better understanding will mean I won't have to go through it ad infinitum. You seem unable, or unwillingness to comprehend:
www.out-law.com/page-8206
Just answer the question -- when ACL's directors make policy decision are these in your view the council's decisions?
Yes or no?
And how is Peter?
I've never seen bfrsba post anything about the team.
Just answer the question -- when ACL's directors make policy decision are these in your view the council's decisions?
Yes or no?
And how is Peter?
Just two away games from me. If personal circumstances had been different , would have gone to a couple more away to boost away support. Desperately miss going to games at Ricoh and desperately miss my club.Due to us playing in Northampton I have seen my team play one this year.
Wtf do you expect me to post about? Do you want me to post about a team performance that I've not seen?
You haven't read, have you? I'm very disappointed. It would have made so many people's lives easier...
You answered the question -- by not answering.
Well the first one anyway. Why so coy about PWKH -- you know him don't you?
Your question is rhetorical. If you educate yourself, you'd understand that
Keep squirming, keep avoiding. I'll keep asking until I get the answer.
What do you post on here for? I've managed double figures despite not going to Northampton.Due to us playing in Northampton I have seen my team play one this year.
Wtf do you expect me to post about? Do you want me to post about a team performance that I've not seen?
What do you post on here for? I've managed double figures despite not going to Northampton.
My opinion . I've seen one away game this season and it breaks my heart I post on her because I've been a city fan since I was 11 and a season ticket holder since I was 16. I am 42.At the end of the day the club is the fans. We are the club. Without fans there is no club.
What I am trying to say is that the council need to see past who the owners are. They have to try and help the city of Coventry's own football club where they can. They don't trust the owners, fine. Then any deal has to be approached with a view to having caveats in place to protect the Ricoh for the people of Coventry.
A deal is there to be done. Surely they can put caveats in place to protect the stadium for future generations of this city.
What do you post on here for? I've managed double figures despite not going to Northampton.
So many on here seem to back the council more than the club?
Tittle says it all, why should CCC help Otium Entertainment Ltd?
In the past 35 years Coventry has seen Peugeot, Jaguar, Triumph, Massy Ferguson, Rolls Royce, GEC, Courtaulds, and many more other major companies close. CCC did not help any of these as they are private companies and free to do as they wish. These companies provided far more to the city in terms of prestige, jobs, and money than a 3rd Division football club ever will.
Also none of these companies ever (to my knowledge) tied CCC up in an expensive legal battle.
So I'd like to hear the arguments as to why CCC should suddenly help a privately owned company.
After all, we all agree that it would have been better for CCC not to help CCFC back in 2003 don't we?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?