Sell on clause is 15% I think? That's what I read a while back. It's easily bypassed though, Bournemouth could sell 2 players to the team interested and value a reserve player as 20m and Wilson as 1m. That way Bournemouth get all the money and technically there's nothing anyone can do
Sell on clause is 15% I think? That's what I read a while back. It's easily bypassed though, Bournemouth could sell 2 players to the team interested and value a reserve player as 20m and Wilson as 1m. That way Bournemouth get all the money and technically there's nothing anyone can do
Surely the sell on clause depends what he is sold for?Thanks. Clever that. You can tell you work in IT.
So going by the first article the clauses including a believed sell on clause are worth just over £750K some of which we would have already received from appearances, goals scored and promotion windfall clauses. Doesn't sound like we've got much of a windfall coming from any sell on clause especially if we've already received a six figure sum from the promotion clause. It's really not selling it to me as a good deal for the club. Someone please tell me that at least we didn't have to pay the wages or even a percentage for the loan's. That would really be talking the piss if we did.
Don't take no notice, its one of the most ludicrous things posted on here.Are you sure ? The reason I say this normally the player gets around 10% of the transfer fee. Also can you say for sure that the above loop hole was not covered in the selling contract to Bournemouth for Wilson ? In effect this action by Bournemouth would be a tort and Coventry could easily claim against this.
I don't think he understands how a sell on clause works.Surely the sell on clause depends what he is sold for?
Surely the sell on clause depends what he is sold for?
I don't think he understands how a sell on clause works.
Where's it say just over?I don't know. How I read it was that we got £2.25M upfront and the loan players and other clauses could see the fee rise to just over £3M including goals, appearances, promotion and a sell on clause. That doesn't sound like a percentage to me, that sounds like a fixed amount. Unless I've misunderstood the article. Of course the article also says believed to be, so it could be wrong either way.
I read it as been worth over 3m, you read just over. There's no use of the word just so you added it in.I think you're assuming that all sell on clauses are based on a percentage and not a fixed amount. Click on Nicks link and read the first article. If you read that different to me fair enough but that's how it read to me.
No that's not how it works.I don't know. How I read it was that we got £2.25M upfront and the loan players and other clauses could see the fee rise to just over £3M including goals, appearances, promotion and a sell on clause. That doesn't sound like a percentage to me, that sounds like a fixed amount. Unless I've misunderstood the article. Of course the article also says believed to be, so it could be wrong either way.
No that's not how it works.
Where's it say just over?
The 22-year-old Cov Kid left his home town club this week to sign for Bournemouth in a loaded deal understood to be £2.25million up front and worth more than £3m in all when taking into account add-ons subject to goals, appearances, promotion, a sell-on clause and the fact that City have taken two Cherries players – goalkeeper Ryan Allsop and winger Mohamed Coulibaly – on loan
My mistake. It's says more than. But the point stands. Yes more than could be £2M if we get 10% of a £20M transfer fee but it could also mean a fixed amount to make the total received £3.1M once all the clauses have been met.
He'd still be cheap IMO even if it is 10%. £5M is what we should have got up front.
My mistake. It's says more than. But the point stands. Yes more than could be £2M if we get 10% of a £20M transfer fee but it could also mean a fixed amount to make the total received £3.1M once all the clauses have been met.
He'd still be cheap IMO even if it is 10%. £5M is what we should have got up front.
And if he keeps scoring, who knows what he will sell for. The price of good young English players is through the roof atm.That's not how how it works, if all of the promotion, goals scored, appearances, international apps. and any other performance related clauses are all met it will take the transfer up to over 3 million.
The sell on % will be on top of everything else, so if he's sold for say 15 million that will take the total value of the deal to probably over 4.5 million.
Skybluetony having a nightmare part 176
Christ did you receive any sort of education at school? How it works really isn't that hard.
How is asking questions and trying to understand the answers having a nightmare? I'm neither a professional footballer, football agent, football manager or a club owner. I don't pretend to understand the intricate details of transfers, there's no nightmare in admitting that. I'm more than big enough to admit I don't understand something. You should try giving it a go sometime.
As I said. Barnsley fans on their forum seem a far more intelligent and knowledgable bunch compared to some of the idiots on here who have an embarrassing lack of knowledge how football operates.
That's not how how it works, if all of the promotion, goals scored, appearances, international apps. and any other performance related clauses are all met it will take the transfer up to over 3 million.
The sell on % will be on top of everything else, so if he's sold for say 15 million that will take the total value of the deal to probably over 4.5 million.
Why do we care how he's doing? Like actually why?
But you are telling others they don't know anything in the process?
Sell on clause is 15% I think? That's what I read a while back. It's easily bypassed though, Bournemouth could sell 2 players to the team interested and value a reserve player as 20m and Wilson as 1m. That way Bournemouth get all the money and technically there's nothing anyone can do
Good god. That surpasses anything on here.
No nothing could every surpass you or Nick
Because we can shout at SISU about it as if him and Clarke played for us we would get promoted easily. (Like we did when they actually did play for us)
Conveniently forgetting that one went in the January transfer window, one missed a big portion of latter half of the season with injury and we had a 10 point deduction. Under different circumstances a playoff place would have easily been achievable and if we weren't playing in Northampton at the same time who knows.
Why did playing in Northampton make a difference out of interest?
It's easily bypassed though, Bournemouth could sell 2 players to the team interested and value a reserve player as 20m and Wilson as 1m. That way Bournemouth get all the money and technically there's nothing anyone can do
we won a few games there didn't we? The same as we lost against crewe with a full house?Because it was an uninspiring, silent dump.
Did you hear TM talking after the Crewe game on CWR saying how the fans were the extra man and lifted the players urging them on to the win? Let's not try and pretend for one minute that ever happened at Sixfields ever.
Because we can shout at SISU about it as if him and Clarke played for us we would get promoted easily. (Like we did when they actually did play for us)
Because it was an uninspiring, silent dump.
Did you hear TM talking after the Crewe game on CWR saying how the fans were the extra man and lifted the players urging them on to the win? Let's not try and pretend for one minute that ever happened at Sixfields ever.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?