I didn't watch the match as i was away, but i'm not surprised that we lost having seen previous Spain and England games at this WWC. Spain looked absolutely woeful against Sweden because the Swedes adopted the high-press. Spain only prevailed in the last 15 minutes when Sweden tired and they were able to play the ticky-tacky possession football more. It sounds as though England didn't/couldn't change their tactics to challenge the Spanish style and technical ability. England, on the other hand, only looked really good in previous games when they played hoofball, with the likes of Russo and Hemp running onto the long through-ball.
The media hype pisses me off, particularly the 1966 comparisons. I don't watch women's football generally because i find the standard frustratingly low and i don't enjoy it. But i don't blame the players for the hype - i just turn off the radio, scroll to the actual news, etc.
I think Earps won the Golden Glove practically by default as she didn't have any notable howlers! As mentioned elsewhere, they need to work on developing goalkeeping standards in the women's game. As for GK shirts, i agree it is too much of a limited market to warrant making them.
The pen was soft, but Earps was off her line and VAR has intervened earlier in the tournament to get a retake.
Roll on the Rugby World Cup!