You admire the thief who stole Highfield Road,
you complain about ricoh rent yet Highfield road rent paid was very similar to the sale price to whom?
Think most intelligent people know who 'bought' it first in one guise or another.
You continue in your deluded state
Emotional guff.
Half of the original members of the Premier League are no longer there. CCFC is a relatively small club. Like or not Richardson's strategies kept the club punching above its weight far more than clubs of a similar size. It allowed the signing of relatively big name players and some exciting times.
Many of the Chairmen at that time were of similar character. Richardson had a swagger and he had some delusion in his ambition. There are of course also some of the interesting accusations which we are all aware.
I suggest, however, you actually start to look at what his successor achieved. He cost cutted on a scale which made Dulieu look profligate. He destroyed anyhope of a return to the Premiership not only by swinging cuts but a trigger happy style regarding managers which saw two of the best prospects in management we had bulleted for very unsuitable "big name" replacements. Then of course there was the disastrous deal with the Ricoh.
Richardson would, I am sure, have reacted differently. He would not have had the "moral dilemna" faced by his successor in pulling the administration trigger at a time when there was no penalty whatsoever. Then he would under a new guise have fought to get a better deal over the new ground. Oh no doubt he would have had a pay rise as well but that's the way it goes.
I dare any Coventry fan to tell me they wouldn't rewind the clock back 15 years and return to Dublin, Huckerby etc. when a certain chairman even received some votes for Player of The Year.