They look really good to be fair, better than the Hummel ones which literally just feel like stickers
You're forgetting the first two rules of MumsNet - you don't talk about MumsNet!
Got to second that I've not had any issues with peeling on the Hummel kits. We wash most stuff at 30° now anyway, don't use a dryer. All look perfect.
I did have a badge peel off a cotton t-shirt though.
I have two of the last Nike home shirts we had with embroidered badges, they were from when they had to restock them. Much prefer the sewn on ones
I did have a badge peel off a cotton t-shirt though.
I have two of the last Nike home shirts we had with embroidered badges, they were from when they had to restock them. Much prefer the sewn on ones
I think a red/green theme but for the same reasons (I think that was our kit back then, could be wrong. I'm on holiday, it's hot and I've drunk a few bottles of cheep Greek White)
We could have a version of this for our third kit albeit different from the sky blue one of course. Hummel and Cov have a deep relationship now so would expect us to be part of the Hummel anniversary celebration.
I'd be happy with that, I love the original template so having it as an away or third would do me nicely
No a new sponsor has been confirmed
but not 100% sure what it is, rumours of Fraser’s/sports direct
Think that was just people speculating on here. Absolutely nothing in it as far as I could tell. Of course, quite possible it’s one of them and DK would surely talk to them about it
Surely if we’re announcing a kit we’ve got a sponsor?
kit would look strange without one
You’d have thought he would do and maybe create some leverage on the rent deal, who knows
As someone said the other day Forest started last season without one. It’s not that rare, there’s quite often one team without one at the start of the season.Surely if we’re announcing a kit we’ve got a sponsor?
kit would look strange without one
Im sure a few years ago, they announced the sponsor like a day before, then the kit was revealed after
You mean like the Chelsea kit announced this week?Surely if we’re announcing a kit we’ve got a sponsor?
kit would look strange without one
In fairness to King it gives him the maximum amount of time to try and get a good deal. Maybe won’t be what he would have liked but I assume that’s the delay.
If It's a Buzzard spent more time being the grammatical/correcting hero he once was, and less time denying climate change, he would call you out on calling them Sporting Lisbon.New sponsor confirmed as sporting Lisbon
Sporting Clube de Portugal. Calling them Sporting Lisbon is like saying Arsenal London (which I remember seeing on teletext in Denmark one year).
Obviously sponsorship generates income, so it obviously something we would want, but I much prefer shirts without the sponsor. It was bad enough with the main shirt sponsor, but now we have back of shirt and shorts. Never understood why people would rather be a walking billboard than have a shirt free of advertising.
