looks like he dont give a toss about being here , like allsop saturday , i genuinely thought hed smoked an ounce of blow before kick off , point stands though , miller looks a threat , mcqoid does notHe's certainly played enough to be written off so let's send him packing.
He's certainly played enough to be written off so let's send him packing.
I don't know about you, but after watching football for 20 years i have picked up the ability to spot a bit of potential in a player. 30 mins -60mins is enough for me to see if a player has the basics to be an asset. Quality is permanent and often shines through, McWank has looked nothing but terrible.
I don't know about you, but after watching football for 20 years i have picked up the ability to spot a bit of potential in a player. 30 mins -60mins is enough for me to see if a player has the basics to be an asset. Quality is permanent and often shines through, McWank has looked nothing but terrible.
How many of us wrote off Robert Rosario when he first came 15 months later a change of manager and position and he was a different player. The same for Craig Bellamy never a number 9 looked a different player when Hartson joined us. However Mcfunny name was very poor and he is 25 at Xmas has scored 8 goals in the last 3 seasons - that is a poor return for a midfielder never mind a strike, can't help but think he was a promising player but is now trying to find his level which may be non-league.
Is he better or worse than Manset?
Or as he is known to greggs "Manwank"
Back the the question...is he likely to be any good Grendel?
His record is hardly encouraging but he should be given a chance. Immediately slating him is not productive.
He's certainly played enough to be written off so let's send him packing.
His record is hardly encouraging but he should be given a chance. Immediately slating him is not productive.
I don't know about you, but after watching football for 20 years i have picked up the ability to spot a bit of potential in a player. 30 mins -60mins is enough for me to see if a player has the basics to be an asset. Quality is permanent and often shines through, McWank has looked nothing but terrible.
You remind me of a fan who sat behind me once, berating Ian Wallace and how anonymous he had been in the first 45 minutes.
After enduring a full 15 minutes of his crap analysis I just had to turn round and point out that Wallace was not playing, he was injured.
You remind me of a fan who sat behind me once, berating Ian Wallace and how anonymous he had been in the first 45 minutes.
After enduring a full 15 minutes of his crap analysis I just had to turn round and point out that Wallace was not playing, he was injured.
Is he better or worse than Manset?
He managed to run around for 90 minutes so on that basis is substantially better than Manset who struggled with 15.Just going on what I saw last night, much worse. Too hard to judge on one game though, let's give him a chance.
Miller looked quite sharp though.