Shamima Begum (1 Viewer)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Well on the plus side for me if it proves a popular decision for the centre and the centre right, which i think it is, Starmer will probably adopt as policy too.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

well yes he has what a surprise

 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
There’s a whole host of people on social media arguing she’s old enough to take responsibility for her actions at 15, whilst simultaneously saying that 16 is too young to be able to apply for a GRC.

Work that one out.

She’s not old enough and 16 is too young for a GRC.

It’s the Venn diagram of people who think the Rotherham girls were groomed vs those who think Begum was that gets me. “15 year olds know what they’re doing” sounds awfully noncey to me.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
You're correct. Every one of those fuckwits that joined ISIS was 'programmed'. Its very bizarre people want to defend this girl, she's become a fucking victim in this thread. SBT madness.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Nobody is defending her - they're against the idea of removing citizenship from somebody due to something they have done and particularly something they did aged 15.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Bizarre from Starmer perhaps he’s just playing to the gallery

 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Nobody is defending her - they're against the idea of removing citizenship from somebody due to something they have done and particularly something they did aged 15.
There's plenty above who sound like they are defending her tbf mate.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Starmer's answer in an interview referred to above was a bit odd, you'd have thought a KC would just say: "the Court will have made its decision based on the information in front of it, having not seen the papers I cannot possibly comment further" but instead he just said he was sure the court was correct. Such a weird lack of confidence in himself.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
There's plenty above who sound like they are defending her tbf mate.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
It’s more complicated than you’re making out. Nobody is defending her actions.

- She was groomed and manipulated as a child.

- she shouldn’t have her citizenship removed.

- she should return to the UK to face a criminal court and be tried and punished for any crimes shes committed.

that’s the general gist of what people are saying
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Starmer's answer in an interview referred to above was a bit odd, you'd have thought a KC would just say: "the Court will have made its decision based on the information in front of it, having not seen the papers I cannot possibly comment further" but instead he just said he was sure the court was correct. Such a weird lack of confidence in himself.

He was pretty confident in the McKinnon case and was outraged he didn’t get his way to deport him for what would be a certain death sentence
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
It’s more complicated than you’re making out. Nobody is defending her actions.

- She was groomed and manipulated as a child.

- she shouldn’t have her citizenship removed.

- she should return to the UK to face a criminal court and be tried and punished for any crimes shes committed.

that’s the general gist of what people are saying
There's people putting their point across well, like Clint, then there's those giving a terrorist sympathy. Anyone who's not willfully blind can spot the difference in some of the posts above.
For what it's worth, I get Clints point but I'm saying I still don't care, anyone who joins ISIS can jog on. A point of view that is popular among most of the country I would think, including Conservative and Labour leadership.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

SBT

Well-Known Member
There's people putting their point across well, like Clint, then there's those giving a terrorist sympathy. Anyone who's not willfully blind can spot the difference in some of the posts above.
Not sure who you’re referring to there, but surely there’s a pretty big difference between being a terrorist sympathiser, and sympathising with someone losing their basic legal rights - even if they’ve done awful things. There’s no Shamima fan club here.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Not sure who you’re referring to there, but surely there’s a pretty big difference between being a terrorist sympathiser, and sympathising with someone losing their basic legal rights - even if they’ve done awful things. There’s no Shamima fan club here.
Willfully blind it is then.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
So you think there are various people in this thread with genuine terrorist sympathies?
Sympathies for a terrorist rather than terrorist sympathies, a subtle difference, but yes looks like it.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Sympathies for a terrorist rather than terrorist sympathies, a subtle difference, but yes looks like it.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Likewise I think there’s a subtle difference between being concerned for our basic human rights, and laying awake all night worrying about poor Shemima. But if you’re just going to get called a secret ISIS lover either way then why bother.
 

robbiekeane

Well-Known Member
She’s not old enough and 16 is too young for a GRC.

It’s the Venn diagram of people who think the Rotherham girls were groomed vs those who think Begum was that gets me. “15 year olds know what they’re doing” sounds awfully noncey to me.
At 15 I was a little Twat smoking weed,, trying to buy knuckle dusters off ebay and sell them at school, and buying potassium nitrate online to make smoke bombs after reading the anarchist cookbook.

I also egged an old blokes house cause he set his dog on us once.

All prickish stuff.

Never ever thought about going off to join a terrorist organisation though….
Also, didn’t she at 20 years old say that the Ariana grande concert killings were justified or something?

She’s absolute scum of the earth and I have no sympathy for her and don’t think she was too young to know what’s right and wrong, so don’t buy into the whole “oh poor thing was groomed” argument.

Should be brought back to the UK and tried though.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
At 15 I was a little Twat smoking weed,, trying to buy knuckle dusters off ebay and sell them at school, and buying potassium nitrate online to make smoke bombs after reading the anarchist cookbook.

I also egged an old blokes house cause he set his dog on us once.

All prickish stuff.

Never ever thought about going off to join a terrorist organisation though….
Also, didn’t she at 20 years old say that the Ariana grande concert killings were justified or something?

She’s absolute scum of the earth and I have no sympathy for her and don’t think she was too young to know what’s right and wrong, so don’t buy into the whole “oh poor thing was groomed” argument.

Should be brought back to the UK and tried though.

Were you groomed by an older man?

Do you think the girls in Rotherham were responsible for their actions?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Likewise I think there’s a subtle difference between being concerned for our basic human rights, and laying awake all night worrying about poor Shemima. But if you’re just going to get called a secret ISIS lover either way then why bother.

I assume you disagree with the sanctions imposed on Graham Phillips without trial?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Paid Russian troll gets sanctioned for being a paid Russian troll. Hardly the same.

Well it is the same as there was no court trial but direct government action. I assume if Thatcher when MI5 were issues concerned regarding John McDonnell and the affiliation to the IRA you’d have been ok if that government froze his bank accounts and ultimately declared him on non citizen with no trial?
 

Nick

Administrator
Were you groomed by an older man?

Do you think the girls in Rotherham were responsible for their actions?

The 12 year olds who were raped?

It's a fucking weird comparison.

What about child sex abuse victims who grow up to abuse children themselves? Ahhhh let them off. Get them round to babysit.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
The 12 year olds who were raped?

It's a fucking weird comparison.

What about child sex abuse victims who grow up to abuse children themselves? Ahhhh let them off. Get them round to babysit.
I like Shmmeee as a poster (most controversial thing I've written in this thread tbh) but the comparison is bonkers.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I like Shmmeee as a poster (most controversial thing I've written in this thread tbh) but the comparison is bonkers.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

I find Begum disturbing as even now she appears to be very much on the side of ISIS as a grown woman. I doubt her mindset has changed

However she is a UK citizen and you have to acknowledge it and she has to be allowed to return

The comparing to rape of minors isn’t especially helpful - I would say Patti hurst is a good comparison - she was kidnapped but the brainwashing did transform her into a full blown Terrorist in the US.
 
Last edited:

NorthernWisdom

Well-Known Member
The comparing to rape of minors isn’t especially helpful
I do feel the need to clarify Rotherham wasn't just 12yos but also 14, 15yis. Here's one Rotherham victim 'disgusted' as 'not ONE professional held to account' although we're going down a path of digression for no real reason really.

Anyway, it's worth noting that yesterday's judgement says:

"there was a credible case that Ms Begum was a victim of trafficking and sexual exploitation when she went to Syria in 2015, that did not stand in the way of the home secretary stripping her of British citizenship, because she had subsequently become a threat." So we're talking about her as an adult wrt the citizenship question.

And tbh that's why it's a bloody mess innit, somebody can have bad things done to them, it can explain why they became a bad person... but that knowledge doesn't stop them being a bad person.
 
Last edited:

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I do feel the need to clarify Rotherham wasn't just 12yos but also 14, 15yis. Here's one Rotherham victim 'disgusted' as 'not ONE professional held to account' although we're going down a path of digression for no real reason really.

Anyway, it's worth noting that yesterday's judgement says:

"there was a credible case that Ms Begum was a victim of trafficking and sexual exploitation when she went to Syria in 2015, that did not stand in the way of the home secretary stripping her of British citizenship, because she had subsequently become a threat." So we're talking about her as an adult wrt the citizenship question.

And tbh that's why it's a bloody mess innit, somebody can have bad things done to them, it can explain why they became a bad person... but that knowledge doesn't stop them being a bad person.

It is an interesting discussion - my real point is governments should not decide without trial to remove people from their society
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
I find the lines disturbing/confusing. She can be stripped of her citizenship (whist being born here and her family is here) but convicted murderers, rapists,serious criminals etc (who weren't born here and were awarded citizenship- in some cases don't even have citizenship) can't be deported because they have new families here.
Obviously there's the different of angle of National security vs public security but there does seem still to be a lack of consistency. Does seem to be very much a political football case.
Some 400 Brits suspected of joining ISIS in Syria etc have returned to the UK and only around 40 prosecuted. for many of these it seems govt only allowed to electronically tag them for 2 years.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
The 12 year olds who were raped?

It's a fucking weird comparison.

What about child sex abuse victims who grow up to abuse children themselves? Ahhhh let them off. Get them round to babysit.

I think it's a strange comparison as well, though as I said in an earlier post, a more like for like comparison is Rhiannan Rudd who did have charges dropped because it was deemed she was groomed.


And even then, even though there are similarities, as someone said every case needs to be dealt with on its own merit and I think Begums actions as an adult need taking into serious consideration.

Another point, what if Bangladesh wanted to wash their hands of a Bangladeshi wrong un and tried to foist them on us because they had British heritage? Would people be ok with that?
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Well it is the same as there was no court trial but direct government action. I assume if Thatcher when MI5 were issues concerned regarding John McDonnell and the affiliation to the IRA you’d have been ok if that government froze his bank accounts and ultimately declared him on non citizen with no trial?
It’s genuinely hard to follow that last sentence, but has Phillips had his citizenship revoked?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I think it's a strange comparison as well, though as I said in an earlier post, a more like for like comparison is Rhiannan Rudd who did have charges dropped because it was deemed she was groomed.


And even then, even though there are similarities, as someone said every case needs to be dealt with on its own merit and I think Begums actions as an adult need taking into serious consideration.

Another point, what if Bangladesh wanted to wash their hands of a Bangladeshi wrong un and tried to foist them on us because they had British heritage? Would people be ok with that?
There would need to be some hard evidence that she really isn't a Bangladeshi citizen.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It’s genuinely hard to follow that last sentence, but has Phillips had his citizenship revoked?

He has had his assets frozen and cannot pay bills. The government has frozen his bank. For a so called journalist you do lack knowledge. Do you review WU flower events for the Basilden Times?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top