SkyBlueZack
Well-Known Member
Couldn't agree more about looking at it when they first took over, as you say you would expect them to. I think they would have been more likely to have got a cheaper rent in the championship at the time, say 600k. Would of saved 700k a year. I think FFP has changed their way of thinking and that's where the stadium push came from. FFP in it's ideal makes it a more level playing field. Think SISU saw the stadium if run well would maximise CCFC FFP therefore giving bigger prospect of promotion. Premiership with 125 year lease from the time the dispute started to say 5 years. No it weren't a short fix but they have been around far longer than they ever envisaged.