Meet CCFC Supremo Chris Anderson On Monday Night (1 Viewer)

[covcity4life]

yeah that makes sense. soon as your argument shot down just pretend you are right anyway.

 

---

[Broken Hearted Sky Blue]

I will have look in a minute but I am sure someone said he said that

He did say that said there was more money available I think from sky/premier than people think or something like that

 

[covcity4life]

He did say that said there was more money available I think from sky/premier than people think or something like that

anyone who believes anderson must be bullying stupot

 

[Nick]

anyone who believes anderson must be bullying stupot

Give it a rest.

 

[covcity4life]

Give it a rest.

why? hate the truth? that was my original point after all before you jumped in escalate matters

wipe the egg of your face and move on and i will too

 

[Nick]

He did say that said there was more money available I think from sky/premier than people think or something like that

How do clubs in LEague 1 get money from the Premier League? Or does he mean things like Parachute Payments?

 

[skybluetony176]

How do clubs in LEague 1 get money from the Premier League? Or does he mean things like Parachute Payments?

Doesn't some of the money from the rights to TV coverage of the premier league filter down the leagues? It doesn't all stay with the premier league although the premier league takes the lions share?

 

[Nick]

Doesn't some of the money from the rights to TV coverage of the premier league filter down the leagues? It doesn't all stay with the premier league although the premier league takes the lions share?

Oh, I thought it would have been seperate pots for each league.

 

[Nick]

why? hate the truth? that was my original point after all before you jumped in escalate matters

wipe the egg of your face and move on and i will too

No, I am just getting fed up of cringing at the stuff you keep posting that pretty much everybody but you can see right through.

 

[Broken Hearted Sky Blue]

How do clubs in LEague 1 get money from the Premier League? Or does he mean things like Parachute Payments?

Sorry was talking about championship

 

[covcity4life]

No, I am just getting fed up of cringing at the stuff you keep posting that pretty much everybody but you can see right through.

i will ask you again. please stop bullying me.

 

[Nick]

i will ask you again. please stop bullying me.

I think you are doing a pretty good job of showing yourself up without my help.

 

[Nick]

Sorry was talking about championship

Ah so the parachute payments for the relegated teams.

 

[covcity4life]

ok you can have last word kiddo

 

[Broken Hearted Sky Blue]

Ah so the parachute payments for the relegated teams.

No all teams

 

[dongonzalos]

I thought that as well. I thought this outrageous deal the premier league negotiated includes a trickle down to all teams in the championship

 

[Broken Hearted Sky Blue]

I thought that as well. I thought this outrageous deal the premier league negotiated includes a trickle down to all teams in the championship

If I remember he said it was a lot more obviously nowhere near the amount that the clubs coming down from the premier get

 

[dongonzalos]

If I remember he said it was a lot more obviously nowhere near the amount that the clubs coming down from the premier get

I think about 90 or 95% of the money stays with the clubs in and relegated from the Prem, the rest is split between everyone else. However the deal is that big thats still a lot of money.

 

[torchomatic]

Next year even the club who finishes bottom will get £99M. How can we ever hope to compete with that?

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

 

[dongonzalos]

Next year even the club who finishes bottom will get £99M. How can we ever hope to compete with that?

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

The likes of Southampton
Swansea Leicester Norwich Bournmouth
We're right to go for it when they did
Once you are in now you really have made it.
Even Villa know they can afford to get relegated clear the squad out and start again.

 

[idm1975]

Next year even the club who finishes bottom will get £99M. How can we ever hope to compete with that?

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

By selling our better players cheap and often, thought you had realised that?

 

[Grendel]

By selling our better players cheap and often, thought you had realised that?

You clearly have insider knowledge on this deal and have every detail on it as you perceive it to be cheap.

Can you share it with everyone else?

 

[idm1975]

You clearly have insider knowledge on this deal and have every detail on it as you perceive it to be cheap.

Can you share it with everyone else?

Is it not what SISU historically do?

 

[covcity4life]

Next year even the club who finishes bottom will get £99M. How can we ever hope to compete with that?

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

will make it very tough.

 

[Skyblueweeman]

Mowbray was saying as recently as 21st January that as far as he was aware we had no need to sell.

This leaves two options:

1) Our budgeting was so poor that despite increasing crowds roughly 40%, we were short of cash.
2) Mowbray was lied to.

Neither of which fill me with confidence in our leadership team.

Or maybe there was bid from Norwich (potentially influenced by Murphy) and the player wanted to go?

Just a thought like...

 

[SkyBlueCharlie]

Next year even the club who finishes bottom will get £99M. How can we ever hope to compete with that?

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

One of the points that CA made on parachute payments are that they are not necessarily as wonderful as they sound. Relegated clubs often have major costs related to their relegation beyond their normal running costs. The cost of wages of players they cannot get rid of, contract payoffs for players that leave. How often do relegated clubs get immediate promotion back to back to the Prem and how many find themselves in dire straits even with the payments, Fulham, Wolves and us leap to mind? His point about the budget when we get promoted was that it would probably be mid-table in the budgets league.
As for the self-sustaining bit where has that come from? I remember Fisher saying that we were cash flow neutral but he didn't appear to have any idea that that meant...it certainly does not mean self-sustaining.
The other thing that CA said that I'm a little surprised that no-one has mentioned, is that the 'owners' had put further funds into the club in the last year. (Not sure whether that meant last season, last financial year or calendar year). If that's true then it should show up in the accounts sometime in the future.)
As many others have said, including me, it was a positive session but the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.

 

[Nick]

Did he say how much they put in or what it was for?

 

[SkyBlueCharlie]

Did he say how much they put in or what it was for?

Neither Nick, it was just a response to a question some one raised about the future financing of the club.

 

[MusicDating]

As many others have said, including me, it was a positive session but the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.

Extra 'Like' for a rare correct use of the pudding phrase

 

[shy_tall_knight]

does a part of callum's transfer fee equate as "extra funds"

 

[Nick]

does a part of callum's transfer fee equate as "extra funds"

Wouldn't they have to take it out to put it back in?

 

[Irish Sky Blue]

One of the points that CA made on parachute payments are that they are not necessarily as wonderful as they sound. Relegated clubs often have major costs related to their relegation beyond their normal running costs. The cost of wages of players they cannot get rid of, contract payoffs for players that leave. How often do relegated clubs get immediate promotion back to back to the Prem and how many find themselves in dire straits even with the payments, Fulham, Wolves and us leap to mind? His point about the budget when we get promoted was that it would probably be mid-table in the budgets league.
As for the self-sustaining bit where has that come from? I remember Fisher saying that we were cash flow neutral but he didn't appear to have any idea that that meant...it certainly does not mean self-sustaining.
The other thing that CA said that I'm a little surprised that no-one has mentioned, is that the 'owners' had put further funds into the club in the last year. (Not sure whether that meant last season, last financial year or calendar year). If that's true then it should show up in the accounts sometime in the future.)
As many others have said, including me, it was a positive session but the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.

I think that bit was meant to be kept secret.

 

[Deleted member 5849]

This is a reference to a comment CA made that as a percentage of the clubs income no club in League 1 relied on ticket sales more than us except for some reason Millwall, others had other off field sources.

Knew the half a million shares I bought in them were a good investment

 

[The Gentleman]

Yes it was, but it's a new man in charge now. Like he's said, what's done is done. This is the now. The club is trying to rebuild its reputation, it's only talked down by so-called fans rather than the population at large.

Great, does that mean that you (and the clapping seals who liked your post) won't be going back over stuff that the council and telegraph have done? oh and in the interest of parity, Sisu too