Recruitment screwed up (13 Viewers)
- Thread starter Captain Dart
- Start date
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Don't forget the £700k we put in for the academy.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
correct - but the budget that is held up by TF etc as being 6th best is from a list provided by the FL based on their formula. It is, and to my mind has always been, misleading talking about budgets because people even within the same club, let alone the fans, talk about different figures but call it the same thing. That in itself causes part of the anger.
If TF is talking the 6th best in L1 and the reality for TM is different then there will be and is an expectation gap for the fans.
TM still has the same budget to pay wages, transfers, loans agents etc yes in general terms as last year ........ was that the one before or after they realised they miscalculated?
Nick
Administrator
Nobody has said solely have they?
Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
You can class the budget/spend allowance/pocket money fund in which ever different clever way you want to.
Mowbray has said that the budget is extremely comparable to last season today, the same budget that got us to finish in 8th last year (despite the best ability to fuck it post Christmas, which a lot of blame has to go to the manager for). That and this budget are without a doubt a top ten one. Look at the relegation form we are experiencing at the moment, that isn't SISU or the budget's fault.
The fact he still has money left over means he is either extremely reckless or well and truly naive. Look at the general matchday squad's from last year compared to the one on Saturday. You'd pick nearly every player last year, even if you factor in the potential of the new bunch during this shit spell. It's not just in aiming too high, but letting good players from last year go, and waiting too long to do business when we should be getting ready for the season and winning the first game which was worth more than the amount of points that kept us out of the playoffs last year. - All those things have been excused by a lot of fans at various points, but it isn't right. This transfer window has been a categorical failure, and the comments today prove that even more.
Mowbray has said that the budget is extremely comparable to last season today, the same budget that got us to finish in 8th last year (despite the best ability to fuck it post Christmas, which a lot of blame has to go to the manager for). That and this budget are without a doubt a top ten one. Look at the relegation form we are experiencing at the moment, that isn't SISU or the budget's fault.
The fact he still has money left over means he is either extremely reckless or well and truly naive. Look at the general matchday squad's from last year compared to the one on Saturday. You'd pick nearly every player last year, even if you factor in the potential of the new bunch during this shit spell. It's not just in aiming too high, but letting good players from last year go, and waiting too long to do business when we should be getting ready for the season and winning the first game which was worth more than the amount of points that kept us out of the playoffs last year. - All those things have been excused by a lot of fans at various points, but it isn't right. This transfer window has been a categorical failure, and the comments today prove that even more.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
A couple of points. The assumption seems to be because the budget hasn't apparently been slashed we must still have an apparent top six budget. This assumption needs all other teams budgets to have stagnated as ours seem to have. Is that likely? I'd guess not. There's every chance that by standing still we have in fact gone backwards. There's no bragging of a top six budget this season. Is that because we haven't got one?
With regards to investment how much would actually need to be required? Could it be as simple as covering wages of new signings for May and June helping you get your first or second choice signings? In the big scheme of things that would seem small fry compared to the other gamble's our owners take with the club. Getting a couple of good early signings in might also give season ticket sales a big boost in July. That small investment might start paying back sooner rather than later.
With regards to investment how much would actually need to be required? Could it be as simple as covering wages of new signings for May and June helping you get your first or second choice signings? In the big scheme of things that would seem small fry compared to the other gamble's our owners take with the club. Getting a couple of good early signings in might also give season ticket sales a big boost in July. That small investment might start paying back sooner rather than later.
Lord_Nampil
Well-Known Member
If he keeps Martin it doesnt really matter if he misses out on 6 targets...... Turnbull was obviously the first choice left sided centre half! Martin would have worked well with him, letting him go now seems really strange!
Grendel
Well-Known Member
If we didn't have any money why did he offer contracts to Ricketts and tudgay but not offer one to Martin or Phillips?
In terms if budget - as everyone is obsessed with it - I wonder how much we are spending on Mowbray, clapham and venus compared to the management budget bestowed last season on burton Albion and this season on Scunthorpe.
He admits he had the budget to offer contract renewals but let them go.
Sorry I think he's a fucking idiot - there I've said it - and I'm already dreading the next pile of shite I've got to watch and then hear his droning on that we dominated, wait until we see where we are until the end of the season and we played them off the park as well has having more corners than them.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
I would be very surprised if our budget has slipped significantly lower than top 6. This is league one, most teams in the league don't have a pot to piss in. I would be very surprised if it has dropped that it has dropped any lower than 10th, certainly not bottom 4, which appears to the standard of squad hes put together.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I wasn't suggesting it's bottom four but experience tells me that the lack of bragging is enough with our owners to conclude that our place in the budget league has slipped.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Other than Waggot one season when have they ever actually bragged. Also as OSB has pointed out any budget figure is hot air anyway.
Covstu
Well-Known Member
Ah so these guys were signed by luck or fluke??? Really!!?? Fuck me, give them some credit that they did some good work in getting these players in!
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
Oh for a win or two, a midweek game, and our injured lot to return. The days in between when we trawl the forum (and CET - don't laugh) hoping for a glimmer of positivity (only to get involved in repeated spats with the same old protagonists) seem to drag. Roll on matchday...
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
He's screwed up if you ask me
thekidfromstrettoncamp
Well-Known Member
Heard Mowbray on after the defeat on Saturday saying playing then and midweek left no time to get on the training ground with the players as if it was unique to us I think by not doing transfer dealing earlier this is what you get no gelling of the team, mind you I think some of his dealing seem like panic.
Seaside-Skyblue
Well-Known Member
Gazolba
Well-Known Member
The big screw up I think was getting rid of players before securing replacements.
Essentially, we sold the donkey pulling our cart, expecting to buy a horse. Now we are stuck with a cart and no animal to pull it except an overweight goat.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
"From our Football League benchmark figure this year we’ll be between sixth and eighth in terms of spend on the playing squad," admitted Waggott, speaking about the budget which is believed to be around £3million.
“But it’s how you use the cash and different managers I have worked with have different opinions."
Not sure how the CET has the player budget then as 3 million.
Then in this article it's 2 million?
I assume they are just guessing as that bit is not a direct quote in either article.
“But it’s how you use the cash and different managers I have worked with have different opinions."
Not sure how the CET has the player budget then as 3 million.
Then in this article it's 2 million?
I assume they are just guessing as that bit is not a direct quote in either article.
Gazolba
Well-Known Member
Didn't you read the article? He tried to sign six centre-halves so he had plans A, B, C, D, E and F.
The mistake he made was letting go the centre-half we had before finding a replacement.
singers_pore
Well-Known Member
Totally agree with you on that one. I would also prefer to have kept JOB rather than Ricketts or Tudgay. I said in the Summer that it would be better to let Ricketts and Tudgay go in order to bring in better quality. It's particularly strange that he resigned Tudgay given that TM didn't play him for most of last season.
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Let's just ignore the council induced points deductions.
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
A bird in the hand..........
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
I'm like most people on here when saying give credit when it's due... but are you telling us we're not allowed to vent feelings when signings are absolute gash?
Moff
Well-Known Member
Sorry SBK but not all the signings are gash, Mowbray and Venus and the scouts put hard work into scouting the players they want, some come off some don't. It was they this that Stu was talking about, the work that is put in.
Can you clarify how you have assessed them as gash? as forgive me for pointing out if you are NPOPM how have you seen any play. I am sure when you played you would have had a rant at fans if they came up to you telling you were shit when they hadn't even seen you play.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Jones
Reid
Vlad
Bigi
Turnbull
Are good signings
They just needed to be in a squad that included Martin and Vincelot
We also needed a goal machine.
Reid
Vlad
Bigi
Turnbull
Are good signings
They just needed to be in a squad that included Martin and Vincelot
We also needed a goal machine.
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
So you're saying that the majority of fans that go to games, and all say that, for instance, Ramage is shit, or Fortune is garbage, or blah, blah blah. are wrong ? Or aren't I allowed to form an opinion on what other fans say?
Moff
Well-Known Member
For Ramage I say Jones, for Fortune I say Armstrong. Yes you can have an opinion, but they are not all gash.
Covstu
Well-Known Member
who said this because my post doesn't state this?? The comment was questioning why people thought that the good signings last year were luck and not judgement or good scouting??
Covstu
Well-Known Member
I think going to the OP and various ones after that attacking Venus and TM on the overall strategy hasn't worked, facts based on the positive signings last year and this year contradict those statements. As you said earlier give credit where credit is due but some on here will only pick up on the negatives rather than the decent players we signed over the last two seasons. Sadly we have let critical players go at the same time. No manager will have all great signings but I have faith in the recruitment network as we have never had access to this 'type' of player before and that is purely down to these two.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Reid is anything but a good signing he looks very average. Bigi is just a free handout and again is nowhere near the level required. I'd like to know why you think Ghadzev is a good signing. To me he's auditioning for a remake of the Invisible Man. How many times have you seen turnball? How can you judge? Based on the signings made i would hold fire.
He has two target men - big target men - and he is playing than wide in a front three miles apart. Ghadzev is at best a spoiler but has been deployed in an advanced role. Bigi is a powderpuff midfielder by this leagues standards. It also makes me laugh when "straight talking" Tony was lauding the reasons for signing him.