Cov utd to play at Butts next season (1 Viewer)

D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
And there's a lesson for Coventry football.

I remember playing against Valley Sports in the Rugby & District League.

They were a very well run, ambitious club. I had the impression, at that time, that the old Rugby Town were not well run despite being in a much higher league. I even thought at the time that VS would overtake them.

Well Rugby Town folded and VS flourished ......

...partly after they lost their ground, mind you...
 

Kneeza

Well-Known Member
...partly after they lost their ground, mind you...
As I recall it this was the main reason Town folded. I was born in Rugby and used to watch Town on odd occasions at Bilton Road. The Co-op owned the land at the time (may still do so for all I know) and decided they wanted it back to develop it. If you look at it now, many, many years later, it's still a patch of grass with footy posts on it (unless it's changed in the last year or two). Bloody shame.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
As I recall it this was the main reason Town folded. I was born in Rugby and used to watch Town on odd occasions at Bilton Road. The Co-op owned the land at the time (may still do so for all I know) and decided they wanted it back to develop it. If you look at it now, many, many years later, it's still a patch of grass with footy posts on it (unless it's changed in the last year or two). Bloody shame.

I always thought that the land is owned by RBC and it's the council who closed the original Rugby town down to develop the land for housing? No wait, couldn't of been. Every council except Coventry's bend over backwards for the local football team.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
I always thought that the land is owned by RBC and it's the council who closed the original Rugby town down to develop the land for housing? No wait, couldn't of been. Every council except Coventry's bend over backwards for the local football team.

Big difference between giving housing priority over a football team to giving it to an out of town rugby franchise.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I always thought that the land is owned by RBC and it's the council who closed the original Rugby town down to develop the land for housing? No wait, couldn't of been. Every council except Coventry's bend over backwards for the local football team.

Firstly, two wrongs don't make a right.

Secondly, that was my understanding too... although before my time ;) so is just talking to fans, like.
 

steve82

Well-Known Member
As I recall it this was the main reason Town folded. I was born in Rugby and used to watch Town on odd occasions at Bilton Road. The Co-op owned the land at the time (may still do so for all I know) and decided they wanted it back to develop it. If you look at it now, many, many years later, it's still a patch of grass with footy posts on it (unless it's changed in the last year or two). Bloody shame.

I always thought that the land is owned by RBC and it's the council who closed the original Rugby town down to develop the land for housing? No wait, couldn't of been. Every council except Coventry's bend over backwards for the local football team.

Co-op still own the land and recently applied to the council to develop on it to public outcry as it held a kids park and football pitch.... Planning permission got refused a few months back and co-op claimed there land and fenced it off to public use and land lays derelict currently as a result of co-op spitting there dummy out.
 

Frankley

Well-Known Member
Hardly, I watched a football game there back in the 1960's. It was a Coventry XI vs a Rest of the League XI. Might have been a testimonial. I forget the details, Football has been played there many times in the past.

But it wasn't the same stadium back in the 1960s, was it? In the 1960s the pitch was inside the cycle track and there was a tiny single stand.

Also, earlier this year the council was seeking to prevent professional football being played at The Butts. Now a team that is aspiring to be a professional football team is to play there.
 

Kneeza

Well-Known Member
Co-op still own the land and recently applied to the council to develop on it to public outcry as it held a kids park and football pitch.... Planning permission got refused a few months back and co-op claimed there land and fenced it off to public use and land lays derelict currently as a result of co-op spitting there dummy out.
That's what I thought. The Co-op Funeral Home was just to the side of it (opposite side from the grandstand) back then too, so it all adds up. Didn't know they'd since fenced it off though. Very sad.
 

Kneeza

Well-Known Member
But it wasn't the same stadium back in the 1960s, was it? In the 1960s the pitch was inside the cycle track and there was a tiny single stand..
No, far from it. I was at that charity match too (we'd moved to Cov by then). Wasn't up to much as a ground IIRC. Nice enough now though, and if, as Jon Sharp keeps telling us, the facilities are to be improved, it should be an excellent 8-10000 capacity facility with covered stands on both sides in a few years (if done as he describes). Unlike the previous two owners, Sharpy seems to be a man of his word, so i'm quite looking forward to seeing how it pans out.
 

ceetee

Well-Known Member
Well whatever the reasons for Rugby Town's demise my point was that a team much more junior in the football hierarchy has overtaken them and indeed taken their place,

I don't want to see that happen to CCFC whatever objections we might have to the current owners, but I think there are some who would welcome it
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Anyway back to the op I understand it's only for one season plus option for one more till improvements of their own ground

A conspiracy theorist could say that was done specifically as a Trojan Horse, to allow CCFC to move in after with less outcry, then ;)
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
But ccfc have to give the FL a credible 10 year plan as to where they will play their home games as I see it the BPA door is bolted
 

Pipehitterz

Well-Known Member
i was told they would have the new masseys ground when it was completed
this was touted for half way through next year
the butts was offered to united in the first season they were started, but was declined by united

with all the non info streaming out, it would seem construction at masseys ground has slowed and the butts is a stopgap

thats all i know myself
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
i was told they would have the new masseys ground when it was completed
this was touted for half way through next year
the butts was offered to united in the first season they were started, but was declined by united

with all the non info streaming out, it would seem construction at masseys ground has slowed and the butts is a stopgap

thats all i know myself
Apparantly there are some cables that have to be moved that's the holdup
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
So Coventry Utd can find a new home and afford to upgrade but we can't.
Fuck me just sell some pies;)
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
i was told they would have the new masseys ground when it was completed
this was touted for half way through next year
the butts was offered to united in the first season they were started, but was declined by united

with all the non info streaming out, it would seem construction at masseys ground has slowed and the butts is a stopgap

thats all i know myself

If the Butts works for them financially they'd be mad to persist with a ground on the edge of town.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Is there any details of their new ground online, be interested to take a look. Do they own the land and our developing their own ground or are they waiting on someone else to build it and they will use it?
 

Rusty Trombone

Well-Known Member
Is there any details of their new ground online, be interested to take a look. Do they own the land and our developing their own ground or are they waiting on someone else to build it and they will use it?
I may be wrong, but as I understand it, Persimmon own the land and as part of the planning permission had to build a new pavilion and pitch (pitches?), there's some info online that suggests that AGCO agreed to lease it from Persimmon, as Persimmon were reluctant to commit to the build cost before getting someone else to take on the management, but it is quite old, so maybe this has changed.

As others have said they have apparently since discovered a huge cable (elec I think) that wasn't on any drawings, and serves most of that side of Cov, and they are trying to figure out what to do.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
If its Persimmon I wouldn't be holding my breath that it will ever happen. They are probably doing their upmost to get out of it and the cable could be their perfect excuse - too expensive to work around.
 

Pipehitterz

Well-Known Member
Should they get promotion what
division do they go in ?
They're in non league division 5 at the Moment which has about 20leagues through the country at same level.
They'll go into a larger regional league spread over 6 leagues.
They'll need a nice shiny coach next year I would imagine.
If Im honest this year they won't go up, they need more investment / Fans etc, and they're already 14 points off top after 7 games. They need a real revival if they want to go up
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
They're in non league division 5 at the Moment which has about 20leagues through the country at same level.
They'll go into a larger regional league spread over 6 leagues.
They'll need a nice shiny coach next year I would imagine.
If Im honest this year they won't go up, they need more investment / Fans etc, and they're already 14 points off top after 7 games. They need a real revival if they want to go up

I think this season will be a stutter while they get their act together, they just recruited Ben Mackey (ex CCFC) from Leamington and they already have Kevin Thornton (ex CCFC and Nandos) on the books, I still reckon they'll finish in the top 5 or 6. The policy seems to be to pull in a few players of higher standard than the league to be able to push for promotion, it requires funding but that is the owners choice. At some point the cost will outstrip their resources but I imagine they have a plan to handle that situation.

FYI Non league tier 5 is League tier 9 and city are in tier 3.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top