GMK used to be a great forum, but entered a downhill spiral to result in a handful of anti-council, anti-CET zealots who'd round on anyone with a contrary view. This forum's default position is now exactly the same.
I'm sure the CET's piece is in response to yet another board member leaving the club in a worse position than he found it. Yet the usual suspects decide its motivated more by a book launch or a desperate bid to increase circulation.
Yes, the CET - like any paper - is looking for readers. Yes, there's a book coming out. But his stance is - I'm sure - in response to the merry-go-round in our board continuing at a point when we're bottom on the league with zero tangible assets. Enough, really, is enough.
(I do understand I haven't posted on here a few weeks, and that makes my view inferior to that of some...)
Not like you to be childish. The usual suspects is the shittest most pathetic statement about either side on here and now you have jumped on the bandwagon.
The Telegraph article is good, if not a few years too late for my liking, but who are these usual suspects you talk about, as if everyone is slagging the Telegraph off? Nick has said his piece, many people disagreed, and they have taken him to task over it. In addition to this a few people have said it was an anti-climax, as from reading the first posts I think people were expecting some news, any news, as we are now at desperation levels, related to SISU getting out of town, and were disappointed it wasn't that and it was only a Telegraph piece, although a very good one.
Lets hope the Telgraph produce more pieces like this and keep the pressure on SISU.
Anyway your opinion counts for shit, you don't post on here often