Whilst I fully support having a academy I think the referrals to Wilson and Madison funding it are over stating things.
Surely you have to look at it as cost centres. The value of those players to the academy is their value at the point they signed their first team contract and left the academy not the value when sold after playing, sometimes for years, in the first team. There is cost process and experience put in by the first team that largely gets ignored. To put the "profit" down the academy alone is mis stating things.
So is the academy really as profitable as claimed if you isolate the profit/cost centres properly?