The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (114 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I’m sure it is but the point is it does have something to do with Brexit as confirmed by the JLR statement and not nothing to do with Brexit as someone on here who claims to be someone important at JLR claims. I did hear on the news last night that any JLR employee who is below the pay grade of those who have the knowledge and understanding to be part of the statement will have the situation explained to them Monday so maybe Grendull will know more then. Luckily for him I’ve already given him the heads up so he might be able to understand it a little on Monday.

I love it when you attempt patronising Tony. It’s like Hale and Pace mocking Morecombe and Wise.

The problem is you are not very good at it. I’ve shared my views with those mature enough to absorb the information.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I love it when you attempt patronising Tony. It’s like Hale and Pace mocking Morecombe and Wise.

The problem is you are not very good at it. I’ve shared my views with those mature enough to absorb the information.

You’ve denied what your employer has said (or unaware as its above your pay grade) even when a link has been provided and the direct quote has been copied and pasted for your benefit. You’ve done the equivalent of the flat earth society bragging that they have members all around the globe.

I haven’t patronised astute. I’ve just pointed out what he’s repeatedly missed. Maybe when you have the maturity to understand what patronising means you’ll understand that. Still not being patronising because you regularly fail to understand what the big words you use mean while trying to look intelligent.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
What’s this obsession with diesels engines? I didn’t even think they were that bad. With today’s technology and the collective pollution of planes and boats and horrendous factories everywhere cars seem a minor issue compared.

Is it just to tax them more for more money and to make us think they care?

If you are bored and can translate this article, you could see some reasons. It explains how this guy Resch operates, and how he blackmails companies including Daimler who he used to work for as environment consultant. The article is a bit Daily Mail style, but has quotes from other sources, so has some truth although it compares the organisation to Nazis. It seems he is an axxehole and doing very well out of his activities, but he is basically right that we should make the air cleaner. His methods are dubious and his solutions not necessarily the right ones. His next targets are petrol and electric cars. The guy is a megalomaniac.

Note: EIKE is itself dubious as a climate change denier. They obviously hate Resch.

Die dubiosen Machenschaften der Deutschen Umwelthilfe und ihres Führers Jürgen Resch
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Again try reading the JLR statement in full that I have already linked. It covers ALL the reasons for the job losses. Maybe you think JLR are lying.

There aren’t any JLR job losses Tony
 

samccov1987

Well-Known Member
I work for jlr and think the Brexit comment is a bit of a cheap shot by management to put pressure on the government over a trade deal with the eu.

Theres two big issues that have caused these job losses.

1. Diesel as already debated

2. Castle Brom plant is producing saloons which no one wants. JLR have permanent employees with no work whilst they have agency at Solihull producing the disco, f pace, Range Rover which are still selling. Halewood has the high volume evoque and disco sport.

Castle broms future is in serious doubt especially with the new cheaper cost Slovakia plant nearly on line, contract manufacturers in Austria & joint ventures in China.

The blame for this sits with our governments handling on diesel, the eu for subsidising new manufacturing sites in Eastern Europe and JLR management for leaving castle brom with dying model types.

As usual the workers suffer
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I work for jlr and think the Brexit comment is a bit of a cheap shot by management to put pressure on the government over a trade deal with the eu.

Theres two big issues that have caused these job losses.

1. Diesel as already debated

2. Castle Brom plant is producing saloons which no one wants. JLR have permanent employees with no work whilst they have agency at Solihull producing the disco, f pace, Range Rover which are still selling. Halewood has the high volume evoque and disco sport.

Castle broms future is in serious doubt especially with the new cheaper cost Slovakia plant nearly on line, contract manufacturers in Austria & joint ventures in China.

The blame for this sits with our governments handling on diesel, the eu for subsidising new manufacturing sites in Eastern Europe and JLR management for leaving castle brom with dying model types.

As usual the workers suffer

Well said. The government have really fucked up with the diesel statement. It’s confused customers and permanently damaged the uk car market. Jlr has virtually all diesel models which are fuel efficient and EU6 compliant.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
You’ve denied what your employer has said (or unaware as its above your pay grade) even when a link has been provided and the direct quote has been copied and pasted for your benefit. You’ve done the equivalent of the flat earth society bragging that they have members all around the globe.

I haven’t patronised astute. I’ve just pointed out what he’s repeatedly missed. Maybe when you have the maturity to understand what patronising means you’ll understand that. Still not being patronising because you regularly fail to understand what the big words you use mean while trying to look intelligent.
The word Brexit was used. But the truth is it is all about a crash in diesel car sales. So yet again what is the Brexit problem you keep mentioning?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
There wasn’t. The uncertainty was classed as a headwind
We all know that. Tony also knows it. It is all in black and white. Mart has said what the problem is. And he lives in Germany where it is becoming a problem. And the link I put up backs up what he says.

But Tony tries to say it is Brexit. Not a surprise in the slightest.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
So what Brexit reason was given?
As it says in their statement and I’ve said already. It surrounds tariffs and the uncertainty that could have on their bottom line. It’s all in their statement. If you read it you won’t have to keep asking me, you’ll have it direct from the horses mouth.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
We all know that. Tony also knows it. It is all in black and white. Mart has said what the problem is. And he lives in Germany where it is becoming a problem. And the link I put up backs up what he says.

But Tony tries to say it is Brexit. Not a surprise in the slightest.

You really don’t read anything do you. I’ve said brexit has something to do with it to someone who says it has nothing to do with it. Again why don’t you read the link I’ve provided to the statement. I accept the statement in its entirety and haven’t said anything different. It’s you who is having trouble with selective reading not me.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Surely you would write it of the headline alone. According to you there aren’t any JLR job losses.

Read the article and also the other guy whose posted on here - educate yourself
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
You really don’t read anything do you. I’ve said brexit has something to do with it to someone who says it has nothing to do with it. Again why don’t you read the link I’ve provided to the statement. I accept the statement in its entirety and haven’t said anything different. It’s you who is having trouble with selective reading not me.
You don't have selective reading?

Sales are seriously down. That is because 90% of the cars they make are diesels. This has nothing to do with Brexit. They have not got rid of 1,000 temp jobs because of Brexit. But they will want to use Brexit to take a bit of heat off them for not planning right.

So I ask you again. How is Brexit at fault for the loss of jobs? If you was right for once there would be massive job losses right through the country just in case Brexit went bad.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
The name is there and the pseudonym..... ( my leaver brother )
What name? So who wrote it?

UKIP was a good thing to happen. It took many of the votes away from the BNP. Even people that have come here to live voted UKIP. But once the BNP were taken off the political radar of course some of them went to UKIP. Now there is no need for UKIP.

What you have posted was their new leader who said he will only do it for a year. Then somebody having a rant like they do on here.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

martcov

Well-Known Member
What name? So who wrote it?

UKIP was a good thing to happen. It took many of the votes away from the BNP. Even people that have come here to live voted UKIP. But once the BNP were taken off the political radar of course some of them went to UKIP. Now there is no need for UKIP.

What you have posted was their new leader who said he will only do it for a year. Then somebody having a rant like they do on here.

Only difference being that the rant from someone in the know who had worked for them in Brussels. Just showing the character of UKIP who hopefully will vanish back to being a small right wing party as BNP was.

I don’t like any of them.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
What name? So who wrote it?

UKIP was a good thing to happen. It took many of the votes away from the BNP. Even people that have come here to live voted UKIP. But once the BNP were taken off the political radar of course some of them went to UKIP. Now there is no need for UKIP.

What you have posted was their new leader who said he will only do it for a year. Then somebody having a rant like they do on here.

They'll probably reinvent themselves as some kind of anti-Islam party in the long-term. Did the BNP ever get a significant number of votes? I'd have thought that most of those going to UKIP would have been Tory voters.

Not sure Farage's dog whistle racist politics should ever be described as a good thing.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Who cares?

We shall see at the municipals, but I sincerely hope that these scum are shown to be what they were and obliterated at the elections. Millions voted for these people in parliamentary elections and European elections and believed their lies. Some still do and admire UKIP. Sick- regardless of being leave or remain.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Read the article and also the other guy whose posted on here - educate yourself
I’ve read it and here’s where we’re at.

You say there are no job losses and to provide a link to an article that says that there are job losses.

On top of that you claim it has nothing to do with Brexit seemingly unaware that your employees have released a statement that says it has something to do with Brexit.

You seem very lost on this and completely out the loop. I’m going to call BS on your self proclaimed importance at JLR.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I’ve read it and here’s where we’re at.

You say there are no job losses and to provide a link to an article that says that there are job losses.

On top of that you claim it has nothing to do with Brexit seemingly unaware that your employees have released a statement that says it has something to do with Brexit.

You seem very lost on this and completely out the loop. I’m going to call BS on your self proclaimed importance at JLR.

No Tony I said there were no job losses to JLR employees which is a correct statement.

The article I posted - which bizarrely even your Euro chum liked - was a sensible and accurate article. Most other posters - employees and not - who have actually commented on this are pretty much all in agreement.

The statement didn’t blame Brexit which I and others have repeatedly pointed out and one poster offered a very reasoned argument about that.

It seems you are last man standing Tony on this one.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Only difference being that the rant from someone in the know who had worked for them in Brussels. Just showing the character of UKIP who hopefully will vanish back to being a small right wing party as BNP was.

I don’t like any of them.
Who is it then? For all I know it is you. But you say you know who it is....
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
They'll probably reinvent themselves as some kind of anti-Islam party in the long-term. Did the BNP ever get a significant number of votes? I'd have thought that most of those going to UKIP would have been Tory voters.

Not sure Farage's dog whistle racist politics should ever be described as a good thing.
Are you saying that UKIP is as bad as the BNP?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
I’ve read it and here’s where we’re at.

You say there are no job losses and to provide a link to an article that says that there are job losses.

On top of that you claim it has nothing to do with Brexit seemingly unaware that your employees have released a statement that says it has something to do with Brexit.

You seem very lost on this and completely out the loop. I’m going to call BS on your self proclaimed importance at JLR.
How is it that you can read something and read something totally different than everyone else?

Oh yes you are trying to make it into an anti Brexit article.

You post a link where you say the person who wrote it is named where they are not. You say that there are job losses at JLR because of Brexit when it is because of them selling 90% diesel engines to their cars when EU rules are stopping people from driving them in certain cities and bringing out even more rules against them. And they are getting hit with higher tax rates.

Then you expect us to take you seriously.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Who is it then? For all I know it is you. But you say you know who it is....

I do know the person.. I told you it is my leaver brother. He is qualified in law and worked as a research assistant in Brussels for UKIP. It ended in tears. He uncovered a lot of things and got accused of being a whistle blower ( someone else was at the time). He now hates part of UKIP, in particular the lying hypocrital gravy trainers that he ended up being involved with.

He is standing for election as a Tory in May.

He is still a right wing swivel eyed leaver. Just not UKIP.

We don’t talk to each other.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Are you saying that UKIP is as bad as the BNP?

I would say so, presumably you don't.

“islam is a cancer that needs eradicating multiculturism does not work in this country clear them all off to the desert with their camals that’s their way of life.”

“I visiting the city of Birmingham recently and felt like a foreigner in the city of my birth, all around me I could hear the sound of jabbering in an alien voice … we also have the Pakistani’ and the Somali’s. Tell me Mr Cameron Why? the men wear their Pyjamas.”
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I would say so, presumably you don't.

“islam is a cancer that needs eradicating multiculturism does not work in this country clear them all off to the desert with their camals that’s their way of life.”

“I visiting the city of Birmingham recently and felt like a foreigner in the city of my birth, all around me I could hear the sound of jabbering in an alien voice … we also have the Pakistani’ and the Somali’s. Tell me Mr Cameron Why? the men wear their Pyjamas.”

I can find similar quotes from Labour Party members to be fair.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
No Tony I said there were no job losses to JLR employees which is a correct statement.

The article I posted - which bizarrely even your Euro chum liked - was a sensible and accurate article. Most other posters - employees and not - who have actually commented on this are pretty much all in agreement.

The statement didn’t blame Brexit which I and others have repeatedly pointed out and one poster offered a very reasoned argument about that.

It seems you are last man standing Tony on this one.

Well the article you linked that you told me would educate me said says JLR job losses. Either you or the article are incorrect as you contradict each other. I let you decide which way around it is as it’s doesn’t bother me either way.

The JLR statement didn’t blame brexit in isolation but then again I’ve never suggested it did. You said it has nothing to do with Brexit. All I’ve actually done is point out is that it says it has something to do with Brexit. Again, either your statement or the JLR statement is incorrect as you contradict each other. Again I’ll let you decide which as it doesn’t bother me either way.

All I’ve done is point out the contradictions between your opinions and a statement from your employer and an article that you’ve linked. It’s all there in black and white.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top