The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (106 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

martcov

Well-Known Member
Do you think other more respected speakers may have an idea of the role as well?

It’s intersting you admit you just nod your head and agree with people without researching it though. I admire your honesty

I have admitted nothing of the sort. But as I have said, this government is known for trying it on.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Do you think other more respected speakers may have an idea of the role as well?

It’s intersting you admit you just nod your head and agree with people without researching it though. I admire your honesty

Anyway, how far has your research got you?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Anyway, how far has your research got you?

Well to be honest if you can’t get past the concept of accepting impartiality in the role then there is little point in carrying on is there as that forms the basis of accepted protocol. There are clues to the impartiality

I find David Starkeys article - if somewhat pretentious - certainly an insight into historical context and entertaining - the fact no speaker has attempted what bercow is attempting for over 500 years is telling. The fact he has a meeting with Grieve 2 days before his actions highly disturbing.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
So parliament shouldn’t be sovereign now?
So parliament should be against what the public votes for when we are allowed a vote?

Forget that you are desperate for us to stay in the EU and answer honestly.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
We live in a representative democracy. We vote for those people who make decisions on our behalf. That’s how it works
And they are in place to do as we ask. They represent us. That is representative democracy.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
So parliament should be against what the public votes for when we are allowed a vote?

Forget that you are desperate for us to stay in the EU and answer honestly.

Hahaha ive already said the country should take the EEA option.

The UK is a representative parliamentary democracy, we are ruled by plebiscites
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
He explained in parliament himself. It’s out there, you can google it or YouTube it. He explained his role. Sitting in a chair and saying nothing in order not to offend anyone is not his primary role. Defence of the House of Commons is not taking sides. It is his primary role. This government has already been held in contempt and didn’t want a meaningful vote and did want to introduce Henry VIII powers. You don’t like your Brexit government being held to the rules.
That is absolute bullshit and you know it is.

Office and Role of Speaker

What is the role of the Speaker of the House of Commons?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Hahaha ive already said the country should take the EEA option.

The UK is a representative parliamentary democracy, we are ruled by plebiscites
Of course you want the EEA option. It means we are in the EU still. We would have to pay in as we do now. We would have to follow the same rules and regulations just like we do now. Or are you going to tell me I am wrong on this fact again?

EEA is a worse choice than remaining in the EU.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
What if the second referendum was 50.1% leave and 49.9% remain

Would we get over it then?

What’s the utility of making up hypothetical scenarios?

Let’s see how things pan out, but if Parliament cannot sort this mess out, a second referendum becomes necessary. Right now, MPs are strongly against a No Deal scenario and are set to reject to reject May’s Deal by a margin expected to be over 100 votes to about 228. The indicative votes is unlikely to find a majority for a Plan B of a Norway or Canadian style-deals. The option of a second referendum is probably the only option that would find a Commons majority.

Fun times ahead.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
If we end up remaining, many leave voters will be unhappy. It will be decided by a second referendum which will be better regulated than the first as we now know the scams that were made to cheat. Criminal investigations are continuing.

Any potential 2nd referendum would have more credibility if the supposed cheating was proven in court and people were charged and/or sentenced. You would also have to investigate any claims of wrongdoing on both sides of the referendum.

If claims can't be substantiated - it takes away from that argument being an effective one for another vote.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
And they are in place to do as we ask. They represent us. That is representative democracy.
I think it’s a little nuanced. We vote for the people that make the decisions rather than vote for the decisions. Am I being pedantic? I’m sorry I’m not trying to be. Why would anyone vote for something that’s bad just cause it was popular? Or was more popular possibly in 2016?
 

Nick

Administrator
Are people really going out to stock up on food?

‘Hamster hoarders’ are stocking up on essentials in case of no deal Brexit

Terrified Brits build Brexit stockpiles of water, food and clothes

Mumsnet user 13luckyblackcats, said: “I am currently making sure I have the next sizes up in clothes for my two DC, and that me and DH are stocked up on essentials like socks, underwear, decent shoes.

“We’re also looking at seeds and fruit plants for next year as I grow a fair amount of food.

Attention seeking bellends. "Look at my stash of food"

People need to have a word with themselves. It isn't 28 days later or The Walking Dead.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
I think it’s a little nuanced. We vote for the people that make the decisions rather than vote for the decisions. Am I being pedantic? I’m sorry I’m not trying to be. Why would anyone vote for something that’s bad just cause it was popular? Or was more popular possibly in 2016?
Your view is that it is bad. Not everyone has the same view as yourself. And it is still about as popular as remaining.

The public WAS given the choice. Blame Cameron for that. The public voted leave. They didn't vote for MP's not to follow their wishes.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Are people really going out to stock up on food?

‘Hamster hoarders’ are stocking up on essentials in case of no deal Brexit

Terrified Brits build Brexit stockpiles of water, food and clothes



Attention seeking bellends. "Look at my stash of food"

People need to have a word with themselves. It isn't 28 days later or The Walking Dead.
The EU themselves have said hardly anything will change as it would harm those we buy from. But this point is always ignored. It takes away too many things against leaving.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Any potential 2nd referendum would have more credibility if the supposed cheating was proven in court and people were charged and/or sentenced. You would also have to investigate any claims of wrongdoing on both sides of the referendum.

If claims can't be substantiated - it takes away from that argument being an effective one for another vote.

Yes, quite agree. I hope that the truth comes out. As for both sides, there must be an equivalence. If one side made accounting errors and the other took dark money from non UK accounts, then you cannot say, „they all cheated so that’s ok“.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
The EU themselves have said hardly anything will change as it would harm those we buy from. But this point is always ignored. It takes away too many things against leaving.

Have you a link to this? No deal means no transition period. That means things change over night.
 

Nick

Administrator
Have you a link to this? No deal means no transition period. That means things change over night.

So do I need to go and do a big shop or not? Should I get my daughter school uniform for the next 3 years and some clean pants just in case?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
To be fair you said the same about a withdrawal agreement.
And it is the same whichever way it goes.

So back to your previous comment. You said EEA is different than remaining in the EU. Have you got a list of how it is different yet?
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
And it is the same whichever way it goes.

So back to your previous comment. You said EEA is different than remaining in the EU. Have you got a list of how it is different yet?

There are various policies that would not need to be adopted, if you look online yourself. Why pretend it doesn’t come down to your mean gripe though, FoM
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
There are various policies that would not need to be adopted, if you look online yourself. Why pretend it doesn’t come down to your mean gripe though, FoM
You said EEA is nothing like staying in the EU. Yet you are still to say what is totally different.

You said the good thing would be that we could make our own trade deals around the world. Yes..... but everything would need checking at our borders.

Yet you disagreed when I said EEA would be worse than staying in the EU.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
You said EEA is nothing like staying in the EU. Yet you are still to say what is totally different.

You said the good thing would be that we could make our own trade deals around the world. Yes..... but everything would need checking at our borders.

Yet you disagreed when I said EEA would be worse than staying in the EU.

1. Where did I say it’d be ‘totally different’. Yet again you’ve made it up - I have continually said that it would be a way to compromise between the two sides, hence it not being ‘totally different’.

2. What would need to be checked? We’d be in the Single Market, eliminating the need for a hard border on the island of Ireland.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top