Well no Tony, actually it IS the point. The point I was reponding to was the suggestion this fiasco is costing companies billions. Some companies in this scenario will obviously be disadvantaged, but some obviously will proit. It won't be a disaster for every business. In fact, you're quids in if you make washers.
I totally get where you are coming from with your figures above and I'm sure that savvy firms will factor in these costs, blame "Brexit", and survive by passing on costs or making cuts where necessary. The investment/pain will give a supply and demand advantages over their competitors who don't take these steps, and have the last laugh in the end.
The costs are not factored in under normal circumstances/ prices. Firms have said they will absorb some of the costs ( means less profits and possibly taking a loss ), but they cannot take all of them, which means higher prices for consumers. In the example of washing machines, the costs of storage will not be as high as for products that have to be stored at cool or temperate temperatures. Cold storage is virtually sold out and costs a lot of money, hence companies using just in time. Costs kept to a minimum meaning competitive prices. Now someone will have to carry these costs.
4 billion was put aside for no deal Brexit preparations by the government. The measures have now been cancelled. Taxpayers money thrown out of the window.