The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (72 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Brexit in exchange for a SInn Fein dominated representation, possibly.


Revoking Article 50 it is, then.

not a chance of revocation - looks like two of Mr Corbyn and Mr McDonnells bucket list may be ticked on Saturday - Irish unification and exit from the Eu
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
You think Irish unification could be a possibility?

Would be a bold Conservative and Unionist Party PM who brings about Irish unity.

I think this deal makes it more likely going forward though, which is why the DUP hate it. Also makes Scottish independence more likely. Support has been growing anyway and the hardest of Brexits will only accelerate that.

Can’t wait for the next few decades on constant trade talks and random shit getting more expensive or unavailable cos we don’t have trade deals though.

giphy.gif
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You think Irish unification could be a possibility?

The agreement made in the act of surrender clearly allows for this eventuality if the Northern Ireland people want it
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Would be a bold Conservative and Unionist Party PM who brings about Irish unity.

I think this deal makes it more likely going forward though, which is why the DUP hate it. Also makes Scottish independence more likely. Support has been growing anyway and the hardest of Brexits will only accelerate that.

Can’t wait for the next few decades on constant trade talks and random shit getting more expensive or unavailable cos we don’t have trade deals though.

giphy.gif

It has nothing to do with the PM - the Belfast treaty allows a referendum in these circumstances and it can be repeated every 7 years

as for Scottish independence it’s fascinating that people believe WTO terms with its biggest trading partner and centuries of legislation that needs to be revisited is a good and tenable idea when it suits
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
will the people of the Republic want it?
They dropped their constitutional claim to it a long time ago.

the terms imply they may have no choice and if they opposed it I’m sure the many on here who are want peace in NI would be truly outraged if they prevented unification
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Has it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Probably - Nick Robinson who hardly comes across as a Johnson fan admits it’s a no lose situation for him on Saturday
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
Not gonna get pulled into any arguments on here because frankly I'm passed it and there is no need, but I was talking to one of my former clients who is based in Dublin and he has said he thinks there is a chance of a united Ireland once again, something he said he never thought would happen in his lifetime.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
What has actually changed? At first glance this seems worse, or at best the same, as the May deal which led to Johnson resigning from the cabinet declaring it "the worst of all worlds" and JRM labelled "cretinous".

Seem the only difference is moving from pushing the border issue down the line via a backstop arrangement to conceding a border is actually needed breaching one of the governments own red lines. Having admitted that there needs to be a border somewhere it seems the DUP is now being 'incentivised', or bribed, to accept NI operating under a different agreement to the rest of the UK.

Essentially we've gone full circle back to the start of negotiations and the deal the EU offered May which she dismissed saying "no British PM could accept".
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
What has actually changed? At first glance this seems worse, or at best the same, as the May deal which led to Johnson resigning from the cabinet declaring it "the worst of all worlds" and JRM labelled "cretinous".

Seem the only difference is moving from pushing the border issue down the line via a backstop arrangement to conceding a border is actually needed breaching one of the governments own red lines. Having admitted that there needs to be a border somewhere it seems the DUP is now being 'incentivised', or bribed, to accept NI operating under a different agreement to the rest of the UK.

Essentially we've gone full circle back to the start of negotiations and the deal the EU offered May which she dismissed saying "no British PM could accept".

Yeah pretty much
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Not gonna get pulled into any arguments on here because frankly I'm passed it and there is no need, but I was talking to one of my former clients who is based in Dublin and he has said he thinks there is a chance of a united Ireland once again, something he said he never thought would happen in his lifetime.
Let’s hope so! It’s about time
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
The DUP's false concern for the GFA is heartening, it feels like a time of reckoning for unionism, what does it actually mean?
It might mean that the assembly will have to be reconvened. Sammy Wilson saying nationalist and unionist must both okay it. Might just be a tactic for sharing the blame but until the assembly is sitting again I can’t see how else both sides can agree in any official legally binding way.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
What don't you like about being able to cast your vote in favour of Boris' brilliant deal? If they'll lose 'so many votes' then that means a second referendum is a foregone conclusion doesn't it?
This is what I don't understand. The leavers say leave is 'the will of the people' therefore any second vote is an easy win for them yet they are the ones who seem dead against it.

I get the idea that it was a referendum and you shouldn't be having those every 5 minutes but at this point surely easier to just have another vote, win it easily and be able to say told you do to the remainers.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
This is what I don't understand. The leavers say leave is 'the will of the people' therefore any second vote is an easy win for them yet they are the ones who seem dead against it.

I get the idea that it was a referendum and you shouldn't be having those every 5 minutes but at this point surely easier to just have another vote, win it easily and be able to say told you do to the remainers.

Leave will 100% win again, then moaning will take place until a 3rd ref happens
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Juncker has said now there is a deal there will be no further extension. We're at shite deal vs no deal.

Edit - sounds like what Juncker has said has been misreported. It isn't shite deal vs no deal
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Junker confirmed no extension will he granted
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Because in 2016 what did we have?????????
We had an advisory referendum in 2016 which has led to this shitshow. So, as you've stated leave are 100% guaranteed to win a second referendum, why would you not be in favour of a second legally binding referendum?

All the arguments that people have changed their mind, didn't know no deal was a possibility, hadn't considered the situation in Ireland etc would be gone and the result would be legally binding.

Why are leavers against a vote that would make what they want legally enforceable?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top