SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
Revoking Article 50 it is, then.
Keep dreaming haha
Revoking Article 50 it is, then.
Brexit in exchange for a SInn Fein dominated representation, possibly.
Revoking Article 50 it is, then.
You think Irish unification could be a possibility?not a chance of revocation - looks like two of Mr Corbyn and Mr McDonnells bucket list may be ticked on Saturday - Irish unification and exit from the Eu
You think Irish unification could be a possibility?
You think Irish unification could be a possibility?
The agreement made in the act of surrender clearly allows for this eventuality if the Northern Ireland people want it
Would be a bold Conservative and Unionist Party PM who brings about Irish unity.
I think this deal makes it more likely going forward though, which is why the DUP hate it. Also makes Scottish independence more likely. Support has been growing anyway and the hardest of Brexits will only accelerate that.
Can’t wait for the next few decades on constant trade talks and random shit getting more expensive or unavailable cos we don’t have trade deals though.
will the people of the Republic want it?
They dropped their constitutional claim to it a long time ago.
This deal has got remoaners rattled :emoji_joy:
Has it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Finally a PM with a backbone, time to get brexit done and move on its been going on for far to long now
Wishful and positive thinking aren't going to make a difference, the DUP don't just 'get on side'.He'll get them on side some how
This deal has got remoaners rattled :emoji_joy:
What has actually changed? At first glance this seems worse, or at best the same, as the May deal which led to Johnson resigning from the cabinet declaring it "the worst of all worlds" and JRM labelled "cretinous".
Seem the only difference is moving from pushing the border issue down the line via a backstop arrangement to conceding a border is actually needed breaching one of the governments own red lines. Having admitted that there needs to be a border somewhere it seems the DUP is now being 'incentivised', or bribed, to accept NI operating under a different agreement to the rest of the UK.
Essentially we've gone full circle back to the start of negotiations and the deal the EU offered May which she dismissed saying "no British PM could accept".
Let’s hope so! It’s about timeNot gonna get pulled into any arguments on here because frankly I'm passed it and there is no need, but I was talking to one of my former clients who is based in Dublin and he has said he thinks there is a chance of a united Ireland once again, something he said he never thought would happen in his lifetime.
Unsurprising
Oh no it isn’tLet’s hope so! It’s about time
Probably - Nick Robinson who hardly comes across as a Johnson fan admits it’s a no lose situation for him on Saturday
Absolute clowns, they will lose so many votes in the next elections
It might mean that the assembly will have to be reconvened. Sammy Wilson saying nationalist and unionist must both okay it. Might just be a tactic for sharing the blame but until the assembly is sitting again I can’t see how else both sides can agree in any official legally binding way.The DUP's false concern for the GFA is heartening, it feels like a time of reckoning for unionism, what does it actually mean?
This is what I don't understand. The leavers say leave is 'the will of the people' therefore any second vote is an easy win for them yet they are the ones who seem dead against it.What don't you like about being able to cast your vote in favour of Boris' brilliant deal? If they'll lose 'so many votes' then that means a second referendum is a foregone conclusion doesn't it?
This is what I don't understand. The leavers say leave is 'the will of the people' therefore any second vote is an easy win for them yet they are the ones who seem dead against it.
I get the idea that it was a referendum and you shouldn't be having those every 5 minutes but at this point surely easier to just have another vote, win it easily and be able to say told you do to the remainers.
You make the next one legally binding. It isn’t difficult.Leave will 100% win again, then moaning will take place until a 3rd ref happens
Just make the second one legally binding. If, as you say, its a 100% certainty leave would win why would any leaver be against a legally binding second referendum?Leave will 100% win again, then moaning will take place until a 3rd ref happens
Because in 2016 what did we have?????????Just make the second one legally binding. If, as you say, its a 100% certainty leave would win why would any leaver be against a legally binding second referendum?
Because in 2016 what did we have?????????
Thank fuck for that!Junker confirmed no extension will he granted
We had an advisory referendum in 2016 which has led to this shitshow. So, as you've stated leave are 100% guaranteed to win a second referendum, why would you not be in favour of a second legally binding referendum?Because in 2016 what did we have?????????