Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (193 Viewers)

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Seeing as I’m on one today. Can you please start saying ‘have’ instead of ‘of’. You come across as relatively handy in a lot of subjects but using ‘of’ absolutely kills anything you say for me.

Have you considered becoming a teacher? Great feedback with a target for improvement.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Access to the EU was far from a given, especially on favourable terms. Access to a much larger central pot is difficult to deny the perks of Dave my man.

The terms that an independent Scotland would HAVE joined the EU on have no baring on their access to EU help.

In conclusion Scotland would have been able to access to the international gilts and bonds market, we just don't know what the interest rate they would have had to pay. The financial markets buy bonds that are considered junk all the time, not that this is the level that the ratings agencies would have given Scotland.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Seeing as I’m on one today. Can you please start saying ‘have’ instead of ‘of’. You come across as relatively handy in a lot of subjects but using ‘of’ absolutely kills anything you say for me.

Auxiliary verbs lives matter
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
The terms that an independent Scotland would HAVE joined the EU on have no baring on their access to EU help.

In conclusion Scotland would have been able to access to the international gilts and bonds market, we just don't know what the interest rate they would have had to pay. The financial markets buy bonds that are considered junk all the time, not that this is the level that the ratings agencies would have given Scotland.

Fan-War-Face-Of-Victory-Reaction-Gif.gif
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
The terms that an independent Scotland would HAVE joined the EU on have no baring on their access to EU help.

In conclusion Scotland would have been able to access to the international gilts and bonds market, we just don't know what the interest rate they would have had to pay. The financial markets buy bonds that are considered junk all the time, not that this is the level that the ratings agencies would have given Scotland.

I would have to say I would have replied before but it might have to be later.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
https://assets.publishing.service.g...19-restaurants-pubs-bars-takeaways-230620.pdf

Pubs and Bars guidance

Nothing about electronic ordering

The 1m+ distancing is very different to what was advertised yesterday. It seems venues are allowed to have people inside and sat down less than 2m apart as long as the venue mitigates i.e. with screens etc. It does not allow for people to just stand less than 2m apart.

Seems that internal attendance will be seating only meaning pubs will need to find bigger outdoor spaces
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
The 1m+ distancing is very different to what was advertised yesterday. It seems venues are allowed to have people inside and sat down less than 2m apart as long as the venue mitigates i.e. with screens etc. It does not allow for people to just stand less than 2m apart.
tbf yesterday I was reading that it's screens, back to back or side by side, but if you're facing one another, it has to be 2m.

I dunno, we'll find out, but it still doesn't sound fun to me!
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
tbf yesterday I was reading that it's screens, back to back or side by side, but if you're facing one another, it has to be 2m.

I dunno, we'll find out, but it still doesn't sound fun to me!

The guidance pretty makes it clear it is not safe to stand less than 2m apart as well.

Also you can't go inside a pub with 2 or more mates
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I’ve been shielding (on medical advice ) since the lockdown began, my son had to move out
6 weeks ago when he returned to work, my 8 y/o daughter hasn’t been able to go out ‘even
for a walk, we haven’t been able to seen any other family members inc my elderly mum.
We also happen to run a pub ‘called the hospital yesterday to seek advice on what we are
Supposed to do now that pubs are reopening ‘was advised it was fine as long as I adhere
To social distancing.
Turns out shielding was never really about keeping me safe,
It was always about keeping the NHS safe.

That was specifically put in the message.

Now it's about keeping the economy safe.

They couldn't give a monkey's about individuals.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
That was specifically put in the message.

Now it's about keeping the economy safe.

They couldn't give a monkey's about individuals.
That’s just absolute bollocks and you know it, it’s been a national effort the whole country has made to keep everyone safe and to protect our NHS, to say the government couldn’t give a toss about individuals is embarrassing
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
That’s just absolute bollocks and you know it, it’s been a national effort the whole country has made to keep everyone safe and to protect our NHS, to say the government couldn’t give a toss about individuals is embarrassing
Why reopen when SAGE don't think it's safe to? Professor Edmund's etc were quote scathing.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Johnson even worse today.

Challenges Starmer to name a country with a working teaching app.

Starmer points out Germany and they have already had 12 million downloads.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
As shit as that is that’s been the case from the very beginning. The first slogan basically said that.
Agreed !!
The Government guidelines state ‘from July 6th I can meet six other people outdoors.
And apparently....
The Government guidelines also state I can run a busy pub from July 4th.
:emoji_thinking:What am I missing.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
That’s just absolute bollocks and you know it, it’s been a national effort the whole country has made to keep everyone safe and to protect our NHS, to say the government couldn’t give a toss about individuals is embarrassing

It’s not bollocks at all. And I’d argue it’s to be expected and not necessarily a bad thing. At that level it’s all about numbers.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top