Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (254 Viewers)

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Well, we all have hassles as a result of this. But an inconvenience is a small thing really. Adapting is just the way it is.

I don’t think you quite get what I mean. I am teaching a practical subject without the ability to do practical work. But people in bubbles of over 100 can do what they want with each other. It isn’t a minor nuisance, it’s a complete flip of our way of working.

Be honest, do you think the measures are proportionate to the risk? Does a half way house on a site with up to 2000 people on it actually make sense?
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I don’t want future society to permanently involve people being scared of passing diseases on to each other. For this winter there likely is a risk of ‘superinfection’ from catching COVID and the cold/flu. The problem of course is that the latter diseases invariably cause symptoms and so you would have schools that could be half in half out and unworkable. My view is that parents of higher risk children or those in higher risk households should be allowed to keep them out. The rest should either also be kept out or allowed in under normal conditions.

The cold will likely do more harm to a child than COVID.

I expect a cold will be more noticeable to a child than Covid, although again the effect of having both together seems unclear at this moment, it's more that they could spread both more generally into wider society and thus into more vulnerable people resulting in the scenario of increasing hospitalisations and everything that goes with that.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I don’t think you quite get what I mean. I am teaching a practical subject without the ability to do practical work. But people in bubbles of over 100 can do what they want with each other. It isn’t a minor nuisance, it’s a complete flip of our way of working.

Be honest, do you think the measures are proportionate to the risk? Does a half way house on a site with up to 2000 people on it actually make sense?
I do get what you mean, you're having to adapt your job, you're inconvenienced, as you said.

You're not the only one who's being inconvenienced atm. Now sure, you may consider the risk to be overblown and that's a valid argument, but an inconvenience is nothing really, an adaption for a small amount of time is nothing really.

And it ain't just you haveing to adapt, or be inconvenienced. I'd argue an inconvenience to gather data is a perfectly valid approach, rather than an as you were and then dealing with the potential fallout.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I do get what you mean, you're having to adapt your job, you're inconvenienced, as you said.

You're not the only one who's being inconvenienced atm. Now sure, you may consider the risk to be overblown and that's a valid argument, but an inconvenience is nothing really, an adaption for a small amount of time is nothing really.

And it ain't just you haveing to adapt, or be inconvenienced. I'd argue an inconvenience to gather data is a perfectly valid approach, rather than an as you were and then dealing with the potential fallout.

I never said it was just me, but there aren’t many professions that have had to tear up and rebuild their way of working overnight. And there are no assurances that it will just be for a short time. We have gathered 9 months of data from around the world and it shows that huge numbers of people are asymptomatic with a low hospitalisation rate and very low mortality rate.

Yet it’s being treated as worse than anything that’s come before. So either keep me out of school or let me do my job.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
I never said it was just me, but there aren’t many professions that have had to tear up and rebuild their way of working overnight. And there are no assurances that it will just be for a short time. We have gathered 9 months of data from around the world and it shows that huge numbers of people are asymptomatic with a low hospitalisation rate and very low mortality rate.

Yet it’s being treated as worse than anything that’s come before. So either keep me out of school or let me do my job.

I don’t think these measures are going anywhere anytime soon. I honestly believe that they will be in place until Easter 2021.
I know what you are saying about collecting data for 9 months but we don’t appear to still know a great deal... why are so many people asymptomatic? how big is the risk to children with suppressed immune systems (this is especially important to me on a personal level)?
I understand your frustrations - but tell me why I should want to go back to normal when I don’t know if it puts my child at risk?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I don’t think these measures are going anywhere anytime soon. I honestly believe that they will be in place until Easter 2021.
I know what you are saying about collecting data for 9 months but we don’t appear to still know a great deal... why are so many people asymptomatic? how big is the risk to children with suppressed immune systems (this is especially important to me on a personal level)?
I understand your frustrations - but tell me why I should want to go back to normal when I don’t know if it puts my child at risk?

I did put in the caveat for at risk households in my post.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
I did put in the caveat for at risk households in my post.
I know you did, and I’m not aiming this comment at you personally.
It’s not just the fact that my daughter would have to stay home, so would her brother, and both her parents that are teachers if we didn’t have these measures in place. And even then there is still some risk attached to it all.
So what do we do? Adapt to a temporary way of working to mitigate for that - it may ultimately end up being a waste when we finally find out some definite facts about this virus.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I know you did, and I’m not aiming this comment at you personally.
It’s not just the fact that my daughter would have to stay home, so would her brother, and both her parents that are teachers if we didn’t have these measures in place. And even then there is still some risk attached to it all.
So what do we do? Adapt to a temporary way of working to mitigate for that ultimately end up being a waste when we finally find out some definite facts about this virus.

What I’m basically saying is that this ‘temporary’ fix leaves me unable to do my job and if that is the case then I may as well do it remotely.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
What I’m basically saying is that this ‘temporary’ fix leaves me unable to do my job and if that is the case then I may as well do it remotely.
And you’ve been failed by the DFE (and maybe your school/trust to a lesser extent) because adjustments should have been put in place to make sure that isn’t the case in terms of curriculum adjustment IMO
 

Skybluefaz

Well-Known Member
All of a sudden people around me seem to be getting the virus. Next door neighbour, friend of a friend. I'm in Cov. Anybody else feel like it's more prevalent now than it ever has been? Can't lie I'm feeling pretty anxious about it all again.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I know it's to be expected of Conservatives who're naturally resistant to change and have many members/donors involved in the property sector, but I'm just so disappointed at this 'get back to the office' mantra.

We've got such a chance to completely alter the way we work that would be so beneficial to individuals, families, environment etc but it's just being ignored because they can't see the opportunities, only the threats.

If you set out a plan for a gradual transition from the idea of a CBD into a more multi-use (but predominantly residential) area you can offset the unquestionable downsides that would occur economically.

We've got high streets with empty shops, loads of unused office space which the last few months have shown isn't completely necessary but a huge shortfall in housing. Surely the sensible market-led thing to do is replace those unused facilities into housing which has high demand?

The demolition of old buildings and construction of the housing (or conversion where possible) will result in jobs in the construction industry and the workers would be using things like cafes/sandwich shops etc during this time. Then when residents move in they will also use them and provide a market for other services.

The main reason I can think of is that with an excess demand for housing the landlords can charge a premium for even poorly kept houses.. More houses built will equalise supply and demand and thus reduce prices and force them to keep their properties in better condition. So they're resisting this and have significant clout within the corridors of power to slow it down. Similar to how the energy industry is slowing the transition to green energy.

For me this is like the mirror of the mining industry situation. Only this time it's the office people down south whose way of life is under threat and that isn't acceptable so it gets protected rather than dismantled with the rhetoric of 're-train' and 'get on your e-scooter and find work'
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Cases rising in certain areas, isn't testing up? Hence higher number of cases... Hospital admittance not rising
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
All of a sudden people around me seem to be getting the virus. Next door neighbour, friend of a friend. I'm in Cov. Anybody else feel like it's more prevalent now than it ever has been? Can't lie I'm feeling pretty anxious about it all again.

I'd dont know anybody that has it in my local area or friends... Throughout this whole "pandemic" I've known of 1 definite and 1 suspected case.
That ofcourse doesn't mean people don't or haven't had it, I'm just going off your response to people you know.

Bear in mind from the off, people in my local area were flouting rules at every given opportunity, kids carried on playing out together and parents carried on having friends round for drinks and had parties throughout lockdown🤷 (we kept to the rules)

More testing, more confirmed cases... Hospital admittance not rising = I dont get the worry
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
What I’m basically saying is that this ‘temporary’ fix leaves me unable to do my job and if that is the case then I may as well do it remotely.
Brighton, are you not allowed to mark books or touch students work ?
Most of my teaching mates ( primary , granted) aren't allowed to mark books.
Absolutely bloody brilliant !
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Brighton, are you not allowed to mark books or touch students work ?
Most of my teaching mates ( primary , granted) aren't allowed to mark books.
Absolutely bloody brilliant !

It's strongly discouraged, I'm setting it all on Teams instead. The main difficulty is not being able to get near them in the classroom to help or see how they're getting on.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Pretty rapid increase plus schools have just gone back.
And yet we are reassured that the rates of infection are fairly level.
Almost 9,000 new cases in France yesterday. I'm guessing we're about 3 weeks behind them as was the case when this all kicked off.
Anyone dare to think we won't reach the same figures the French are suffering? Given our population is similar to theirs, but in an area half the size with a capital city population many millions more than any other European city I'd say it's a foregone conclusion.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Just read that the larger Infection numbers could be from a smaller dose of the infection being passed around due to social distancing hence low hospital admissions..
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Just read that the larger Infection numbers could be from a smaller dose of the infection being passed around due to social distancing hence low hospital admissions..
I read that too. Fingers crossed it’s accurate. We had one kid showing symptoms at school on Friday but not heard if a confirmed case.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
They were talking about viral load mattering before were they? Would make sense that as people are more careful the viral load is reduced I guess?
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Got to live with it now, protect the vulnerable until we get the vaccine hopefully by the end of the year if trump gets his way, but we can’t have another full lockdown as the country is already on its knees
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Got to live with it now, protect the vulnerable until we get the vaccine hopefully by the end of the year if trump gets his way, but we can’t have another full lockdown as the country is already on its knees
The country is on its knees because Mr ‘Oven Ready deal’ and his cabinet of fucktards have somehow conspired to be world beating in how fucking shit their response was. But it’s OK to let work more people die to keep millionaires like that knob from Pimlico plumbers in hair dye and fake tan.

Any vaccine we get will be in spite of Trump, not because of him.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Got to live with it now, protect the vulnerable until we get the vaccine hopefully by the end of the year if trump gets his way, but we can’t have another full lockdown as the country is already on its knees
He isn't going to get his way, just because he might get it licenced for his fucked up country doesn't mean this country will do the same. There won't be a widespread vaccine until this time next year at best, regardless, even if there was one this year I wouldn't trust Hancock and the other buffoons to coordinate a mass vaccination.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
My lad came back from his first day at school on Friday with a temperature and a cough and cold. Went for the test Saturday. We’ve just received a text that he came back negative.

Proper stressing me out but I guess this is life with a child now. Schools are not socially distancing at his age. He was playing with his best mate in a different class at lunch.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Got to live with it now, protect the vulnerable until we get the vaccine hopefully by the end of the year if trump gets his way, but we can’t have another full lockdown as the country is already on its knees
So my wife is one of the vulnerable, does that mean I shouldn’t be sending the kids to school?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
My lad came back from his first day at school on Friday with a temperature and a cough and cold. Went for the test Saturday. We’ve just received a text that he came back negative.

Proper stressing me out but I guess this is life with a child now. Schools are not socially distancing at his age. He was playing with his best mate in a different class at lunch.
Glad he’s alright. Schools a stress at the moment.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Apparently it’s all over Facebook (according to the wife) that two Rugby schools are closing years due to outbreaks. Not sure how true that is if at all.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
My lad came back from his first day at school on Friday with a temperature and a cough and cold. Went for the test Saturday. We’ve just received a text that he came back negative.

Proper stressing me out but I guess this is life with a child now. Schools are not socially distancing at his age. He was playing with his best mate in a different class at lunch.
The bubbles are nothing like portrayed on TV some time ago .
I've had some kind of cold this week I think .
A not particularly fierce or consistent cough .
No temperature .

Lower Stoke (me) St Michaels higher numbers this week according to CT .
I'm not surprised,No real distancing going on ,No masks in Local shops .
Same at euro car parts on Wednesday.
Slightly sore throat today .
It feels like the regular thing that goes around close to the leaves falling off the trees ,and when they start to grow again. My old Ma's great old wives tale ,very accurate in my opinion.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top