Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (115 Viewers)

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
It’s not though is it? If you are a manual labourer with a long service in a company you’d be entitled to £16,000 plus 12 weeks pay tax free - companies would love it - ditch old people and get the state to pick up the tab

You’re talking about right now? I don’t think UBI is a serious proposal for now.

God knows what you do right now. Extending furlough seems the only realistic idea if we think it’ll be over by a year or so. Maybe fund voluntary redundancy in some cases?

Whatever you do though people will lose their jobs and their industry likely won’t be hiring for a while. Of course redundancy payments should be made to them. I’m just saying in the future UBI would avoid this situation but would need an equal balance of loosening of regulation.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
IF jobs can be done as well and efficiently at home then why the clamour to return?

Well for a start the service providers who provide transport and leisure and refreshment facilities - also I am I suspect one of a handful of people here who have worked at home for a large PLC and without some office presence it’s really ridiculous as a concept.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You’re talking about right now? I don’t think UBI is a serious proposal for now.

God knows what you do right now. Extending furlough seems the only realistic idea if we think it’ll be over by a year or so. Maybe fund voluntary redundancy in some cases?

Whatever you do though people will lose their jobs and their industry likely won’t be hiring for a while. Of course redundancy payments should be made to them. I’m just saying in the future UBI would avoid this situation but would need an equal balance of loosening of regulation.

You should extend furlough for SME but every other company needs to return - it should never have been offered to large companies and allowing them the £1,000 bonus is money down the drain
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Well for a start the service providers who provide transport and leisure and refreshment facilities - also I am I suspect one of a handful of people here who have worked at home for a large PLC and without some office presence it’s really ridiculous as a concept.
As someone who doesn’t work in that kind of industry why is it ridiculous? Just trying to understand
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
As someone who doesn’t work in that kind of industry why is it ridiculous? Just trying to understand

As someone who worked from home for the worlds biggest (at that time) company for a couple of years, I can tell you in my experience it’s absolutely no problem at all long as your colleagues are set up right too. There’s no issue. It’s ridiculous to clamour for returns to offices in the year 2020 in the midst of a huge pandemic, when the big buzzwords for years have been ‘work life balance’, ‘remote working’, ‘flexitime’ etc.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Well for a start the service providers who provide transport and leisure and refreshment facilities - also I am I suspect one of a handful of people here who have worked at home for a large PLC and without some office presence it’s really ridiculous as a concept.

Then the fault is with the way the economy works and it should be looked upon how this can be improved upon over time with as minimal impact during that transition.

It's like waking up with a massive hangover and deciding the best cure is back on the booze. Short term it might alleviate it but longer term it just ain't sustainable.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
As someone who worked from home for the worlds biggest (at that time) company for a couple of years, I can tell you in my experience it’s absolutely no problem at all long as your colleagues are set up right too. There’s no issue. It’s ridiculous to clamour for returns to offices in the year 2020 in the midst of a huge pandemic, when the big buzzwords for years have been ‘work life balance’, ‘remote working’, ‘flexitime’ etc.
Work life balance has been one of the major reasons for teachers leaving the profession. Some schools and heads get it, some really do not. I know I can’t teach from home effectively and we need to be in school for as long as it remains safe to do so, but the lockdown has shown us that we don’t need to stay at school anymore after the kids go home. We can do meetings, training and all the other shite we have to from home now. The days of expecting teachers to hang around unnecessarily should be over.
I would have thought offices would be all over that stuff.
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
Work life balance has been one of the major reasons for teachers leaving the profession. Some schools and heads get it, some really do not. I know I can’t teach from home effectively and we need to be in school for as long as it remains safe to do so, but the lockdown has shown us that we don’t need to stay at school anymore after the kids go home. We can do meetings, training and all the other shite we have to from home now. The days of expecting teachers to hang around unnecessarily should be over.
I would have thought offices would be all over that stuff.

It goes to show that all the talk before covid of companies wanting to really improve employee welfare was actually hot air. One minute you have corporations boasting about their latest innovation to improve employee wellbeing, but lethal virus all over the place? Fuck you, get your arses back in
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
It goes to show that all the talk before covid of companies wanting to really improve employee welfare was actually hot air. One minute you have corporations boasting about their latest innovation to improve employee wellbeing, but lethal virus all over the place? Fuck you, get your arses back in
I'm sure the people saying everyone should head back to the office have the best intentions.
Almost laughable how its always the market should dictate but then a blind panic to get everyone in the office when it looks like property developers and the likes of Pret & Starbucks might lose a few quid.

We've got something here that could among other things, massively improve peoples quality of life, reduce the strain on public transport, get cars off the road & improve the environment. Companies who have implemented similar prior to the pandemic report increased productivity and staff retention. Its an absolute no brainer yet the clamour is for everyone to get back to the office.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Seems details of Johnson's 'Operation Moonshoot' have been leaked. Have to say it reads more like another scheme to divert money to his mates than a serious proposal to get things back to some sort of normal.
A briefing memo sent to the first minister and cabinet secretaries in Scotland, seen by The BMJ, says that the UK-wide Moonshot programme is expected to “cost over £100bn to deliver.” If achieved, the programme would allow testing of the entire UK population each week.
To put that into perspective that's the same as the education budget for the UK, or over half the budget for the NHS.
The leaked documents reveal a heavy reliance on the private sector to achieve the mass testing and give details of “letters of comfort” that have already been signed with companies to reach three million tests a day by December. Firms named are GSK for supplying tests, AstraZeneca for laboratory capacity, and Serco and G4S for logistics and warehousing.
Already questions being raised about the reliance on the private sector and a lack of experts being involved.
Some of the technology it would require does not yet exist.
Also sounds like there's going to be an app so you can show you have had a negative test. No problem there with the great track record on app development!
Lets hope they can actually pull this off because at the moment its looking like it could be the only way we're getting back to anything approaching normal anytime soon.
 

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
8091b59dc70de41a06f279f3022777f8.jpg


Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
It goes to show that all the talk before covid of companies wanting to really improve employee welfare was actually hot air. One minute you have corporations boasting about their latest innovation to improve employee wellbeing, but lethal virus all over the place? Fuck you, get your arses back in

Hmmm, I’m not sure it’s that dramatic. A lot of firms I’m aware of are, where possible, continuing some level of WFH. Look at a number of the banks and accountancy firms for example ?!!

I think a good thing to come out of all this will be better work life balance, flexible working etc but as I’ve said before that shouldn’t mean that most people shouldn’t be going back in at least a proportion of the time, if it’s safe for them to do so.

Ps there are also a number of intangible benefits for businesses and individuals from being in a work place together at least some of the time (building better relationships, sharing views and experiences, diverse thinking etc etc) Not to mention the wider short term impact on the local small business communities if people dont
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I'm sure the people saying everyone should head back to the office have the best intentions.
Almost laughable how its always the market should dictate but then a blind panic to get everyone in the office when it looks like property developers and the likes of Pret & Starbucks might lose a few quid.

We've got something here that could among other things, massively improve peoples quality of life, reduce the strain on public transport, get cars off the road & improve the environment. Companies who have implemented similar prior to the pandemic report increased productivity and staff retention. Its an absolute no brainer yet the clamour is for everyone to get back to the office.

Nothing fucks up progress like monetary self interest...
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Seems details of Johnson's 'Operation Moonshoot' have been leaked. Have to say it reads more like another scheme to divert money to his mates than a serious proposal to get things back to some sort of normal.

To put that into perspective that's the same as the education budget for the UK, or over half the budget for the NHS.

Already questions being raised about the reliance on the private sector and a lack of experts being involved.

Also sounds like there's going to be an app so you can show you have had a negative test. No problem there with the great track record on app development!
Lets hope they can actually pull this off because at the moment its looking like it could be the only way we're getting back to anything approaching normal anytime soon.

It's pie in the sky. It'd be great if it were possible but logistically and financially it's a non-starter.

Add to his list of crackpot ideas like a bridge to Ireland, the Estuary airport, the garden bridge, bendibuses....
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Check out iAbra feature on Sky news .
Moonshot not so pie in the sky maybe ..
Like I said yesterday was discussing this at the barber's before the conference yesterday how frustrating that there wasn't a a viable instant test .
They have developed a machine that will analyse the sample of saliave ( realtime ,30 second's or so .
Transit points ,mass gatherings at sport , entertainment venues could function instantly.
Adaptable for all viruses.
Measures wavelengths through AI to identify spikes on protein's etc .
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Yep it’s crazy that people have considered it as a possibility

The only way something like this would be even remotely feasible is if the virus has some sort of chemical signature that could be detected by a breathalyser. To my knowledge that isn't the case (although I did hear they were going to look into training dogs to detect corona)
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Considering the amount of anti vaxers around I think something like this is maybe more effective and quicker combined with a QR code or the like and a short lockdown to cover the incubation period?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
the issue with testing everyone everyday is that even with a 1% false positive you could let up to 600k cases slip through (unlikely i know but top line figures) or with the same rate of false positives you could take 600k out of the community each day.

The Virolens machine could be a nice thing to have at airports but as I said and the givernment and PHE say the technology to quickly and accurately test people does not exist.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top